18 research outputs found
A Type-Directed Negation Elimination
In the modal mu-calculus, a formula is well-formed if each recursive variable
occurs underneath an even number of negations. By means of De Morgan's laws, it
is easy to transform any well-formed formula into an equivalent formula without
negations -- its negation normal form. Moreover, if the formula is of size n,
its negation normal form of is of the same size O(n). The full modal
mu-calculus and the negation normal form fragment are thus equally expressive
and concise.
In this paper we extend this result to the higher-order modal fixed point
logic (HFL), an extension of the modal mu-calculus with higher-order recursive
predicate transformers. We present a procedure that converts a formula into an
equivalent formula without negations of quadratic size in the worst case and of
linear size when the number of variables of the formula is fixed.Comment: In Proceedings FICS 2015, arXiv:1509.0282
Model-Checking Process Equivalences
Process equivalences are formal methods that relate programs and system
which, informally, behave in the same way. Since there is no unique notion of
what it means for two dynamic systems to display the same behaviour there are a
multitude of formal process equivalences, ranging from bisimulation to trace
equivalence, categorised in the linear-time branching-time spectrum.
We present a logical framework based on an expressive modal fixpoint logic
which is capable of defining many process equivalence relations: for each such
equivalence there is a fixed formula which is satisfied by a pair of processes
if and only if they are equivalent with respect to this relation. We explain
how to do model checking, even symbolically, for a significant fragment of this
logic that captures many process equivalences. This allows model checking
technology to be used for process equivalence checking. We show how partial
evaluation can be used to obtain decision procedures for process equivalences
from the generic model checking scheme.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2012, arXiv:1210.202
Three notes on the complexity of model checking fixpoint logic with chop
This paper analyses the complexity of model checking fixpoint logic with Chop – an extension of the
modal μ-calculus with a sequential composition operator. It uses two known game-based characterisations
to derive the following results: the combined model checking complexity as well as the data complexity
of FLC are EXPTIME-complete. This is already the case for its alternation-free fragment. The expression
complexity of FLC is trivially P-hard and limited from above by the complexity of solving a
parity game, i.e. in UP ∩ co-UP. For any fragment of fixed alternation depth, in particular alternation-
free formulas it is P-complete
The Complexity of Model Checking Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic
Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic (HFL) is a hybrid of the simply typed
\lambda-calculus and the modal \lambda-calculus. This makes it a highly
expressive temporal logic that is capable of expressing various interesting
correctness properties of programs that are not expressible in the modal
\lambda-calculus.
This paper provides complexity results for its model checking problem. In
particular we consider those fragments of HFL built by using only types of
bounded order k and arity m. We establish k-fold exponential time completeness
for model checking each such fragment. For the upper bound we use fixpoint
elimination to obtain reachability games that are singly-exponential in the
size of the formula and k-fold exponential in the size of the underlying
transition system. These games can be solved in deterministic linear time. As a
simple consequence, we obtain an exponential time upper bound on the expression
complexity of each such fragment.
The lower bound is established by a reduction from the word problem for
alternating (k-1)-fold exponential space bounded Turing Machines. Since there
are fixed machines of that type whose word problems are already hard with
respect to k-fold exponential time, we obtain, as a corollary, k-fold
exponential time completeness for the data complexity of our fragments of HFL,
provided m exceeds 3. This also yields a hierarchy result in expressive power.Comment: 33 pages, 2 figures, to be published in Logical Methods in Computer
Scienc
Temporal Logic with Recursion
We introduce extensions of the standard temporal logics CTL and LTL with a recursion operator that takes propositional arguments. Unlike other proposals for modal fixpoint logics of high expressive power, we obtain logics that retain some of the appealing pragmatic advantages of CTL and LTL, yet have expressive power beyond that of the modal ?-calculus or MSO. We advocate these logics by showing how the recursion operator can be used to express interesting non-regular properties. We also study decidability and complexity issues of the standard decision problems
Model Checking Timed Recursive CTL
We introduce Timed Recursive CTL, a merger of two extensions of the well-known branching-time logic CTL: Timed CTL is interpreted over real-time systems like timed automata; Recursive CTL introduces a powerful recursion operator which takes the expressiveness of this logic CTL well beyond that of regular properties. The result is an expressive logic for real-time properties. We show that its model checking problem is decidable over timed automata, namely 2-EXPTIME-complete
The Tail-Recursive Fragment of Timed Recursive CTL
Timed Recursive CTL (TRCTL) was recently proposed as a merger of two extensions of the well-known branching-time logic CTL: Timed CTL on one hand is interpreted over real-time systems like timed automata, and Recursive CTL (RecCTL) on the other hand obtains high expressiveness through the introduction of a recursion operator. Model checking for the resulting logic is known to be 2-EXPTIME-complete.
The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility to obtain a fragment of lower complexity without losing too much expressive power. It is obtained by a syntactic property called "tail-recursiveness" that restricts the way that recursive formulas can be built. This restriction is known to decrease the complexity of model checking by half an exponential in the untimed setting. We show that this also works in the real-time world: model checking for the tail-recursive fragment of TRCTL is EXPSPACE-complete. The upper bound is obtained by a standard untiming construction via region graphs, and rests on the known complexity of tail-recursive fragments of higher-order modal logics. The lower bound is established by a reduction from a suitable tiling problem
A Cyclic Proof System for HFL_?
A cyclic proof system allows us to perform inductive reasoning without
explicit inductions. We propose a cyclic proof system for HFLN, which is a
higher-order predicate logic with natural numbers and alternating fixed-points.
Ours is the first cyclic proof system for a higher-order logic, to our
knowledge. Due to the presence of higher-order predicates and alternating
fixed-points, our cyclic proof system requires a more delicate global condition
on cyclic proofs than the original system of Brotherston and Simpson. We prove
the decidability of checking the global condition and soundness of this system,
and also prove a restricted form of standard completeness for an infinitary
variant of our cyclic proof system. A potential application of our cyclic proof
system is semi-automated verification of higher-order programs, based on
Kobayashi et al.'s recent work on reductions from program verification to HFLN
validity checking.Comment: 27 page