Dependency Tree Automata

Abstract. We introduce a new kind of tree automaton, a dependency tree automaton, that is suitable for deciding properties of classes of terms with binding. Two kinds of such automaton are defined, nondeterministic and alternating. We show that the nondeterministic automata have a decidable nonemptiness problem and leave as an open question whether this is true for the alternating version. The families of trees that both kinds recognise are closed under intersection and union. To illustrate the utility of the automata, we apply them to terms of simply typed lambda calculus and provide an automata-theoretic characterisation of solutions to the higher-order matching problem

Higher-Order Matching, Games and Automata

Higher-order matching is the problem given t = u where t, u are terms of simply typed λ-calculus and u is closed, is there a substitution θ such that tθ and u have the same normal form with respect to βη-equality: can t be pattern matched to u? This paper considers the question: can we characterize the set of all solution terms to a matching problem? We provide an automata-theoretic account that is relative to resource: given a matching problem and a finite set of variables and constants, the (possibly infinite) set of terms that are built from those components and that solve the problem is regular. The characterization uses standard bottom-up tree automata. 1

Model-Checking Games for Typed lambda-Calculi

AbstractWe consider the transfer of verification techniques to structures with binding

Direct and Expressive Type Inference for the Rank 2 Fragment of System F

This thesis develops a semiunification-based type inference procedure for the rank 2 fragment of System F, with an emphasis on practical considerations for the adoption of such a procedure into existing programming languages. Current semiunification-based rank 2 inference procedures (notably that of Kfoury and Wells) are limited in several ways, which hinder their use in real-world settings. First of all, the translation from an instance of the type inference problem to an instance of the semiunification problem (SUP) is indirect; in particular, because of a series of source-level transformations that take place before translation, the translation is not syntax-directed. As a result, type errors discovered during the semiunification process cannot be cleanly translated back to specific subexpressions of the source program that caused the error. Also, because the rank 2 fragment of System F lacks a principal types property, an inference procedure cannot output a single type that encompasses all of a given term's derivable types. The procedure must therefore either rely on user assistance to produce the right type, or simply choose arbitrarily one of the given term's possible types. The algorithm of Kfoury and Wells in particular makes degenerate type assumptions in the absence of user assistance, and consequently produces types that are of no practical use. We build up our system in stages; we begin by improving the SUP translation. Whereas termination for the Kfoury-Wells rank 2 inference procedure is assured by translating terms into instances of the acyclic semiunification problem (a decidable subset of SUP, which is undecidable in general), we formulate and target the R-acyclic semiunification problem---a larger decidable subset of SUP that facilitates a more concise translation from source terms. We next eliminate the source-level transformation of terms, in order to formulate a truly syntax-directed translation from a source term to a set of SUP-like constraints. In doing so, we find that even the full SUP itself is not sufficiently equipped to support such a translation. We formulate USUP, a superset of SUP that incorporates a new class of identifier we call an unknown. We formulate decidable subsets of USUP, and then formulate a truly syntax-directed translation from source terms into USUP, with guaranteed termination. Finally, to address the principal types problem, we introduce a notation for types in which we allow a particular class of variable to stand for type constructors, rather than ordinary types (an idea based on the so-called third-order lambda-calculus). We show that, with third-order types we can not only output large sets of useful types for a given term, without programmer assistance, but the types we output also generalize over more System F types than any type within System F itself can do, and still be a valid type for the source term. Thus, our system increases opportunities for separate compilation and code reuse beyond any existing system of which we are aware. Our system is sound, though incomplete in certain well-characterized ways, despite which our system performs exactly as one would hope on a variety of examples, which we illustrate in this thesis