Detecting Repackaged Android Applications Using Perceptual Hashing

The last decade has shown a steady rate of Android device dominance in market share and the emergence of hundreds of thousands of apps available to the public. Because of the ease of reverse engineering Android applications, repackaged malicious apps that clone existing code have become a severe problem in the marketplace. This research proposes a novel repackaged detection system based on perceptual hashes of vetted Android apps and their associated dynamic user interface (UI) behavior. Results show that an average hash approach produces 88% accuracy (indicating low false negative and false positive rates) in a sample set of 4878 Android apps, including 2151 repackaged apps. The approach is the first dynamic method proposed in the research community using image-based hashing techniques with reasonable performance to other known dynamic approaches and the possibility for practical implementation at scale for new applications entering the Android market

Enter Sandbox: Android Sandbox Comparison

Expecting the shipment of 1 billion Android devices in 2017, cyber criminals have naturally extended their vicious activities towards Google's mobile operating system. With an estimated number of 700 new Android applications released every day, keeping control over malware is an increasingly challenging task. In recent years, a vast number of static and dynamic code analysis platforms for analyzing Android applications and making decision regarding their maliciousness have been introduced in academia and in the commercial world. These platforms differ heavily in terms of feature support and application properties being analyzed. In this paper, we give an overview of the state-of-the-art dynamic code analysis platforms for Android and evaluate their effectiveness with samples from known malware corpora as well as known Android bugs like Master Key. Our results indicate a low level of diversity in analysis platforms resulting from code reuse that leaves the evaluated systems vulnerable to evasion. Furthermore the Master Key bugs could be exploited by malware to hide malicious behavior from the sandboxes.Comment: In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Mobile Security Technologies (MoST) 2014 (http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6674

Universal Skeptic Binder-Droid - Towards Arresting Malicious Communication of Colluding Apps in Android

Since its first release, Android has been increasingly adopted by people and companies worldwide. It is currently estimated that around 1.1 billion Android devices are in use. Even though Android was built with Security principles and comes with a sound security model, it is a favorite target for malware authors. McAfee observed a 76% year on year growth in Android malware during the year 2014 alone. Thus malware is a predominant threat in Android ecosystem. A common attack vector for Android malware is the use of colluding apps. Colluding apps involve two or more applications and operate in two phases. In Phase 1, one application steals private sensitive data of the user In Phase 2, the same application sends the data to another application via covert communication channels. There are several covert channels in Android frameworks. Until now, several solutions in the literature have focused on preventing the extraction of sensitive data from the phone. We, to the best of our knowledge, are the first to stop the flow of sensitive info via the covert channels. We propose, Universal Skeptic Binder-Droid, an enhanced Binder module which enforces policies regarding the use of communication channels and prevents apps from colluding. With our proposed system, we have the added advantage of dynamically configuring policies at run time. Our initial implementation and results on our test bed reflect on the effectiveness and the ease of use of such a system

A Survey and Evaluation of Android-Based Malware Evasion Techniques and Detection Frameworks

Android platform security is an active area of research where malware detection techniques continuously evolve to identify novel malware and improve the timely and accurate detection of existing malware. Adversaries are constantly in charge of employing innovative techniques to avoid or prolong malware detection effectively. Past studies have shown that malware detection systems are susceptible to evasion attacks where adversaries can successfully bypass the existing security defenses and deliver the malware to the target system without being detected. The evolution of escape-resistant systems is an open research problem. This paper presents a detailed taxonomy and evaluation of Android-based malware evasion techniques deployed to circumvent malware detection. The study characterizes such evasion techniques into two broad categories, polymorphism and metamorphism, and analyses techniques used for stealth malware detection based on the malware’s unique characteristics. Furthermore, the article also presents a qualitative and systematic comparison of evasion detection frameworks and their detection methodologies for Android-based malware. Finally, the survey discusses open-ended questions and potential future directions for continued research in mobile malware detection

SEMEO: A SEMANTIC EQUIVALENCE ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR OBFUSCATED ANDROID APPLICATIONS

Software repackaging is a common approach for creating malware. In this approach, malware authors inject malicious payloads into legitimate applications; then, to ren- der security analysis more difficult, they obfuscate most or all of the code. This forces analysts to spend a large amount of effort filtering out benign obfuscated methods in order to locate potentially malicious methods for further analysis. If an effective mechanism for filtering out benign obfuscated methods were available, the number of methods that must be analyzed could be reduced, allowing analysts to be more productive. In this thesis, we introduce SEMEO, a highly effective and efficient fil- tering approach that can determine whether an obfuscated and an original version of a method are semantically equivalent. Our approach handles seven common, com- plex types of obfuscation and can be effective even when all types are compositely applied. In an empirical evaluation, we applied SEMEO to nine Android apps of varying complexity, and the approach provided over 76% recall and 100% precision in identifying semantically equivalent methods. We then performed three additional studies, that showed that: (1) SEMEO is much more effective at identifying semantically equivalent methods than FSquaDRA, an existing technique; (2) SEMEO is also effective for identifying repackaged apps that have been previously obfuscated by ProGuard, a popular obfuscation tool; and (3) SEMEO is effective at identifying semantically equivalent methods in a repackaged, malicious version of Pokemon Go