62,652 research outputs found
Identification of gene pathways implicated in Alzheimer's disease using longitudinal imaging phenotypes with sparse regression
We present a new method for the detection of gene pathways associated with a
multivariate quantitative trait, and use it to identify causal pathways
associated with an imaging endophenotype characteristic of longitudinal
structural change in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our
method, known as pathways sparse reduced-rank regression (PsRRR), uses group
lasso penalised regression to jointly model the effects of genome-wide single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), grouped into functional pathways using prior
knowledge of gene-gene interactions. Pathways are ranked in order of importance
using a resampling strategy that exploits finite sample variability. Our
application study uses whole genome scans and MR images from 464 subjects in
the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. 66,182 SNPs
are mapped to 185 gene pathways from the KEGG pathways database. Voxel-wise
imaging signatures characteristic of AD are obtained by analysing 3D patterns
of structural change at 6, 12 and 24 months relative to baseline. High-ranking,
AD endophenotype-associated pathways in our study include those describing
chemokine, Jak-stat and insulin signalling pathways, and tight junction
interactions. All of these have been previously implicated in AD biology. In a
secondary analysis, we investigate SNPs and genes that may be driving pathway
selection, and identify a number of previously validated AD genes including
CR1, APOE and TOMM40
Novel translational approaches to the search for precision therapies for acute respiratory distress syndrome.
In the 50 years since acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was first described, substantial progress has been made in identifying the risk factors for and the pathogenic contributors to the syndrome and in characterising the protein expression patterns in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with ARDS. Despite this effort, however, pharmacological options for ARDS remain scarce. Frequently cited reasons for this absence of specific drug therapies include the heterogeneity of patients with ARDS, the potential for a differential response to drugs, and the possibility that the wrong targets have been studied. Advances in applied biomolecular technology and bioinformatics have enabled breakthroughs for other complex traits, such as cardiovascular disease or asthma, particularly when a precision medicine paradigm, wherein a biomarker or gene expression pattern indicates a patient's likelihood of responding to a treatment, has been pursued. In this Review, we consider the biological and analytical techniques that could facilitate a precision medicine approach for ARDS
Methodological Issues in Multistage Genome-Wide Association Studies
Because of the high cost of commercial genotyping chip technologies, many
investigations have used a two-stage design for genome-wide association
studies, using part of the sample for an initial discovery of ``promising''
SNPs at a less stringent significance level and the remainder in a joint
analysis of just these SNPs using custom genotyping. Typical cost savings of
about 50% are possible with this design to obtain comparable levels of overall
type I error and power by using about half the sample for stage I and carrying
about 0.1% of SNPs forward to the second stage, the optimal design depending
primarily upon the ratio of costs per genotype for stages I and II. However,
with the rapidly declining costs of the commercial panels, the generally low
observed ORs of current studies, and many studies aiming to test multiple
hypotheses and multiple endpoints, many investigators are abandoning the
two-stage design in favor of simply genotyping all available subjects using a
standard high-density panel. Concern is sometimes raised about the absence of a
``replication'' panel in this approach, as required by some high-profile
journals, but it must be appreciated that the two-stage design is not a
discovery/replication design but simply a more efficient design for discovery
using a joint analysis of the data from both stages. Once a subset of
highly-significant associations has been discovered, a truly independent
``exact replication'' study is needed in a similar population of the same
promising SNPs using similar methods.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS288 the Statistical
Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical
Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
- ā¦