209 research outputs found
Even shorter proofs without new variables
Proof formats for SAT solvers have diversified over the last decade, enabling
new features such as extended resolution-like capabilities, very general
extension-free rules, inclusion of proof hints, and pseudo-boolean reasoning.
Interference-based methods have been proven effective, and some theoretical
work has been undertaken to better explain their limits and semantics. In this
work, we combine the subsumption redundancy notion from (Buss, Thapen 2019) and
the overwrite logic framework from (Rebola-Pardo, Suda 2018). Natural
generalizations then become apparent, enabling even shorter proofs of the
pigeonhole principle (compared to those from (Heule, Kiesl, Biere 2017)) and
smaller unsatisfiable core generation.Comment: 21 page
Positional Games and QBF: The Corrective Encoding
Positional games are a mathematical class of two-player games comprising
Tic-tac-toe and its generalizations. We propose a novel encoding of these games
into Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) such that a game instance admits a
winning strategy for first player if and only if the corresponding formula is
true. Our approach improves over previous QBF encodings of games in multiple
ways. First, it is generic and lets us encode other positional games, such as
Hex. Second, structural properties of positional games together with a careful
treatment of illegal moves let us generate more compact instances that can be
solved faster by state-of-the-art QBF solvers. We establish the latter fact
through extensive experiments. Finally, the compactness of our new encoding
makes it feasible to translate realistic game problems. We identify a few such
problems of historical significance and put them forward to the QBF community
as milestones of increasing difficulty.Comment: Accepted for publication in the 23rd International Conference on
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT2020
Faster LRAT Checking Than Solving with CaDiCaL
DRAT is the standard proof format used in the SAT Competition. It is easy to generate but checking proofs often takes even more time than solving the problem. An alternative is to use the LRAT proof system. While LRAT is easier and way more efficient to check, it is more complex to generate directly. Due to this complexity LRAT is not supported natively by any state-of-the-art SAT solver. Therefore Carneiro and Heule proposed the mixed proof format FRAT which still suffers from costly intermediate translation. We present an extension to the state-of-the-art solver CaDiCaL which is able to generate LRAT natively for all procedures implemented in CaDiCaL. We further present Lrat-Trim, a tool which not only trims and checks LRAT proofs in both ASCII and binary format but also produces clausal cores and has been tested thoroughly. Our experiments on recent competition benchmarks show that our approach reduces time of proof generation and certification substantially compared to competing approaches using intermediate DRAT or FRAT proofs
- …