The United States’ Attack Against Venezuela: Might Does Not Make Right

Abstract

The United States’ attack on Venezuela, as well as the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, have no justification in international law or international relations. This post will first discuss major international law issues implicated by this attack, including the prohibition on the use of force norm, possible exceptions to the use of force, as well as aggression. Next, this post will offer some thoughts regarding the implications of this attack for the international legal order. This post will conclude that the United States’ attack against Venezuela constitutes both a violation of international law, as well as a major threat to international peace and stability

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

redirect
Last time updated on 28/01/2026

This paper was published in Cleveland-Marshall College of Law.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.