As urbanization accelerates, stormwater management in cities has shifted from focusing strictly on water quantity to addressing water quality. Traditionally implemented systems, such as stormwater ponds, while offering effective solutions, often require large land areas to implement, making them impractical for dense urban environments. Underground stormwater systems, like EcoVault, offer a more compact solution; however, they lack scientific studies under real-world conditions to prove their effectiveness in treating pollutants. This study evaluates the treatment performance of two parallel EcoVault systems with the same design, consisting of a sedimentation step and a filtration step. These facilities were retrofitted into two different stormwater sewer networks draining two urban catchments. The systems were assessed for their ability to treat total suspended solids, metals, nutrients, and organic pollutants from urban runoff. Over 15 rain events, the average total suspended solids (TSS) removal rate was 40% for EcoVault A and 46% for EcoVault B. The removal rates for metals varied, with EcoVault B showing better performance for average metal treatment (53% for Cu and 58% for Zn). However, neither EcoVault system removed dissolved metals, often with an increase of dissolved metal concentration in the effluent. The filtration step did not contribute to pollutant treatment, likely due to clogging and high hydraulic loading rates. The study highlighted the potential of underground stormwater treatment in areas with limited space availability, while identifying challenges such as treatment of dissolved pollutants.Validerad;2025;Nivå 1;2025-11-11 (u2);Full text: CC BY license;This article has previously appeared as a manuscript in a thesis.</p
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.