This paper explores Bernard Stiegler’s topic of anticipation throughout his diagnoses of contem-porary malaise. Focusing on Stiegler’s particular method, that we will describe as continuous gesture of (re)doubling, we will open a straight confrontation between Martin Heidegger’s theo-rization of care [Sorge] and taking care [besorgen], and Stiegler’s caring as paying attention and thinking, in which we will underline above all the specific role of technics. As a result, we will conclude proposing the necessity of a “politics of intermittence” that will allow to restore the tragic movement of thinking as the duty of a philosophy worthy of the present time and capable of not escaping from technology
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.