Location of Repository

A textual and contextual study of English language and literature essays: the case of First Year English Department students' writing in Dhaka University, Bangladesh

By Nevin Farida


This research examines English language and literature essays written by First Year students of the English Department at Dhaka University (Bangladesh) using multi-method genre analysis. The first method used was text analysis. Essay topics were analysed from the two contexts to identify their topic fields and main rhetorical functions. This helped develop the two models to analyse the structure of essays: an Exposition-Discussion model and a Description-Recount model. Then, a total of 100 essays from the two contexts were analysed on the basis of Move-strategy structure to see what structural patterns the essays possessed, what tactical choices the students took to express the moves and what was presented in terms of content matter within those moves. The second method was a questionnaire that was distributed to students in the department to discover their perceptions of the writing tasks given. And the third method was interviews conducted with teachers and students of the department to find out about their perceptions of student writing. This, then, is a genre-based study which draws both on written data and on interaction with community members.\ud The multi-method approach to genre analysis revealed that students of the English Department write three different kinds of essays, Description-Recount language essays, Exposition-Discussion language essays and Exposition-Discussion literature essays. The study further revealed that although students wrote these different kinds of essays, they were unable to make connections between their language essay writing tasks and literature ones because of the disciplinary variations. Moreover, the literature essays were found to be much more challenging to write than the language ones. In the light of this, the need for a fourth type of essay writing is identified.\ud This research contributes to the fields of applied linguistics and education in several ways. Firstly, the models developed not only give insights into the generic structure of the essays students write in the English Department at Dhaka University, but they could also function as a starting point for other researchers working with similar texts. Secondly, the analyses of the high and low grade essays explain how some features of writing are more highly valued than others in this context. Thirdly, the study has pedagogical implications that can benefit students and teachers who would use genre based approach to teaching language and literature essay writing. Fourthly, this research demonstrates a multi-method approach to genre analysis which brings out complementary and sometimes contradictory perspectives on the same written products. Fifthly, it can help university planners and policy makers to consider the relationship between main discipline courses and support courses and minimise any gaps. Finally, it can raise awareness among the global applied linguistics community about the kind of student writing produced in contexts such as the English Department of Dhaka University

Topics: LB2300, PE
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1109

Suggested articles



  1. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Spec fic Purposes. doi
  2. (2000). A proposed content-based academic purposes syllabus for the Foundation Course 2 at the
  3. (2000). A Rulebook for Arguments. Indianapolis:
  4. (2001). Advances in Written Text Analysis. doi
  5. (2006). An apology for content-based instruction. Department of English, University of Dhaka Publication.
  6. (2006). Assessing the contribution of corpora to EAP practice. Motivation in Learning Language for Specific and Academic Purposes. Macedonia: University of Macedonia. Retrieved on 16/4/2008 from //www. rda. ac. uk/Lanzualzes/about/staff/p-a-thomps2n. asR>
  7. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco & London: Jossey-Bass Publishers Miller, C.
  8. (1979). Cognitive development and the basic writer. doi
  9. (1982). College composition: initiation into the academic discourse community.
  10. (1988). Cross-cultural variation in persuasive student writing.
  11. (2006). Crossing the boundaries of genre studies: commentaries by experts. doi
  12. (1997). English for Academic Purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. doi
  13. (2000). From personal experiences to reflective practitioner: academic literacies and professional education.
  14. (1999). From postgraduate student to published writer: discourse variation and development in TESOL. Unpublished PhD thesis.
  15. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: an investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. doi
  16. (1993). Genre in Practice.
  17. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process doi
  18. (2007). How to Write Essays and Assignments.
  19. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. doi
  20. (1992). Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. doi
  21. (1989). Importance and necessity of English in Bangladesh.
  22. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. doi
  23. (1983). International Reading association:
  24. (2006). Introduction: perspectives on discourse analysis. doi
  25. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In Chickering (ed) The Modern American College.
  26. Mapping out new directions for English at the universities, Paper presented at the BELTA (Bangladesh English Language Teachers' Association) National Conference held at British Council,
  27. (2005). Metadiscourse. London and NY: Continuum -----------
  28. (2002). Multilingual writers and the academic community: towards a critical relationship. doi
  29. (1984). On tacit knowledge in academia (mimeo) 356 -------------- doi
  30. (1998). Our English achievement tests and what we really achieve.
  31. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. doi
  32. (2004). Research Genres. Cambridge: CUP ------------
  33. (1998). Student writing in Higher Education: an academic literacies approach. doi
  34. (2001). Student writing in Higher Education: contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching doi
  35. (2004). Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education. London & NY: Routeledge Coffin,
  36. (2005). The application of communicative language teaching in Bangladesh. Dhaka University Studies.
  37. (1981). The composing process of two Spanish speakers and the coherence in their texts :A case study.
  38. (2001). The Dhaka University English curriculum: a decade of development? In
  39. (2008). The Discourse Reader 2"d Edition. London
  40. (1999). The five paragraph essay. Retrieved on 18/4/2008 from //www.
  41. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes. doi
  42. (2002). Using Postcolonial Literature in ELT. The English Teacher: An
  43. (2006). Variation in disciplinary culture: university tutors' views on assessed writing tasks.
  44. (2003). Westerns Interstate Commission for
  45. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: a genre-based view. London doi
  46. (2003). Writing at University: a guide for students. doi
  47. (1990). Writing for Study Purposes. Cambridge: doi
  48. (1983). Writing in response to literature.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.