Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The effects of a feedback-based instruction programme on developing EFL writing and revision skills of first year Moroccan university students

By Malika Haoucha

Abstract

The stimulus for this study was problems I encountered in my teaching of academic writing to first year undergraduates majoring in English at a Moroccan university. Their problems ranged from sentence, to paragraph to essay levels. Added to that was my realization that the teaching of writing is mainly product-oriented and that practice is far from theory. Students are expected to produce good writing, but the means for helping them attain the required writing standards are not clearly identified or provided. A focus on narrative writing seems not to serve the purpose of training students to make their voices heard in argumentative writing. Reliance on lecturing as a means of teaching writing robs the writing class of an appealing social environment. These problems combined with a personal desire to improve my teaching by researching my professional practice against the insights of theory; all these factors gathered to stimulate me to undertake the present research.\ud This project is based on the teaching of a writing programme I developed based on my previous experience as a writing teacher and on student need. In its progressive teaching of writing the programme follows a process approach; however, the product perspective is also important. Students are exposed to three types of feedback on multiple-draft writing: self-monitored feedback using annotations; peer feedback; and teacher written feedback and taped commentary. The aim is to encourage them to experience writing as an interactive process, from the pre-writing activities through the actual writing and revising to the writing of a final draft, rather than as a monotonous solitary activity performed under exam pressure. Using a case study approach this qualitative inquiry looks into the extent to which students make use of the different types of feedback in their revisions, their attitudes to the feedback procedures, and whether text quality improves over the drafts during the course period. For this purpose various data collection tools have been used. These include questionnaires, in-depth interviews, students' writings, audio-taped recordings of student peer feedback sessions, teacher written and taped comments, and student diaries.\ud In line with previous research, the present study has shown that self-monitored feedback using annotations can help identify problematic areas in writing, but it has also added that annotations can unveil students' perceptions of what constitutes good writing. Moreover, the study has demonstrated that peer feedback activities are not only helpful in terms of encouraging revision but that they have other cognitive, linguistic and affective benefits. Finally, there is strong evidence that teacher written feedback is still considered by students to be a major source of help and that they do take it into consideration in their revisions. In addition, teacher taped commentary, a type of feedback which has received little attention in the literature, is an effective means of commenting on content and organisation and focusing student revision on these areas. Students have also appreciated it and acknowledged its cognitive, linguistic, affective, and practical benefits. Furthermore, the study has shown that although students' writings have not systematically, and regularly, improved from first to second drafts, i. e. after revision following peer feedback, there is a tendency for improvement from second to third drafts. i. e. after revision following teacher feedback. On the whole, improvement in text quality varied from one student to another and also from one draft to another for the same student.\ud The main implications are that the one-draft writing tendency in the context of the study should give way to multiple-draft writing. The motivating force of revision can be promoted and enhanced through the use of different types of feedback on separate drafts. More importantly; however, the writing class should cater for student need by making use of motivational instructional and feedback activities

Topics: LB2300, PE
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1187

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). 4ffect in Language Learning. Cambridge:
  2. (1981). A Cognitive process theory of writing. doi
  3. (1992). A student's contribution to second language learning. Part I: Cognitive variables. doi
  4. (1993). A student's contribution to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. doi
  5. (1989). A study of teachers' evaluation of English composition in secondary schools in Jordan. Arab Journal for Humanities.
  6. (1989). A Study ofLinguistic and Cognitive Constraints in Learners' Written Discourse.
  7. (1968). A Writer Teaches Writing: A practical Method of Teaching Composition.
  8. (2001). a. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Longman
  9. (2000). Academic writers on-line: investigating pausing in the production of text. doi
  10. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of writing skills. doi
  11. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Applications.
  12. (2002). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. doi
  13. (1991). An Investigation into the Written English of Moroccan Secondary School Pupils. Unpublished
  14. (1990). An ongoing dialogue: learning logs for teacher preparation.
  15. (1981). Analysing revision. doi
  16. (1995). Analyzing talk in peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. doi
  17. (1983). Anguish as a second language: remedies for composition teachers. In
  18. (1992). Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning. doi
  19. (1982). Asking students to annotate their own papers. doi
  20. (1995). Assessment and Learning: Contradictory or Complementary? In
  21. (1992). at's Wrong with Ethnography: Methodological Explorations. doi
  22. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. doi
  23. (1979). Beyond qualitative and quantitative methods in education research. In doi
  24. (1989). Beyond the staircase: A comparison of the reliability of six composition scoring methods.
  25. (1998). Case Studies. In doi
  26. (1988). Case study in educational research: seeking sweet water.
  27. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Ministry of Higher Education Document "Contribution A I'dlaboration de la r6forme pddagogique de Venseignement supdrieur",
  28. (2000). Case Study Research Methods.
  29. (1984). Case Study Research. doi
  30. (1984). Case study.
  31. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher: Conflicts of purpose and conduct. doi
  32. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. doi
  33. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. doi
  34. (1990). Collaboration in a traditional classroom environment. doi
  35. (1984). Collaborative learning and the "Conversation of Mankind. " doi
  36. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language instruction. doi
  37. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research.
  38. (1995). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language leaming: looking at and through the diary studies. In
  39. (1996). Conflict or compatibility in classroom inquiry? One teacher's struggle to balance teaching and research. doi
  40. (1989). Contexts for developing argument. In
  41. (1986). Contrastive Rhetoric and the Structure of Learner-produced Argumentative Texts in Arabic
  42. (1967). Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of composition. doi
  43. (2003). d edn). Thousand Oaks, doi
  44. (1991). Dialogues of deliberation: Conversation in the teacher-student writing conference. doi
  45. (2002). Diaries: listening to 'voices' from the multicultural classroom. ELTJournal 5613:
  46. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. doi
  47. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? doi
  48. (1983). Does leaming to write have to be so difficult? In
  49. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. doi
  50. (2005). Doing Qualitative Research. doi
  51. (1988). Don't correct - Reformulate! In
  52. (1981). Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. doi
  53. (1987). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory and practice. doi
  54. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? doi
  55. (1989). ESL composition: analysing revision (Doctoral dissertation,
  56. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher written comments: Texts, contexts and individuals. doi
  57. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students. doi
  58. (1993). Essentials ofEnglish Language Teaching.
  59. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. doi
  60. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. doi
  61. (2003). Exploring the nature of teacher research. doi
  62. (2005). Feb. Responding to writing: Writing revisited plenary paper.
  63. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELTJournal 44/4: doi
  64. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. doi
  65. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. doi
  66. (1998). Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path. doi
  67. (1971). First discussant's comments: What is memory development the development of? doi
  68. (1991). Focus on the Language Classroom: an introduction to classroom researchfor language teachers. Cambridge:
  69. (2003). Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. doi
  70. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. doi
  71. (1988). Four dimensions of social construction in written communication.
  72. (1995). From marking to feedback: Audiotaped responses to student writing.
  73. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In doi
  74. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. doi
  75. (2003). Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: doi
  76. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, doi
  77. (1999). Introduction to Academic Writing.
  78. (1998). Introduction to Research Understanding andApplying Multiple Strategies (2 nd edn.
  79. (1991). Introduction to Second Language Acquisition. doi
  80. (1998). Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research.
  81. (2003). Introduction: Teaching the next generation of second language writers. doi
  82. (1996). Investigating Problems Constraining the Implementation of Process Writing in the Moroccan EFL Classroom. Unpublished Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of diploma of inspector of English,
  83. (2004). Knock-on effects of mode change on academic discourse. doi
  84. (1988). Knowing our knowledge: A phenomenological basis for teacher research.
  85. (1977). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition (Tech.
  86. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. doi
  87. (1983). Language Attitudes among Arabic-French Bilinguals in Morocco. doi
  88. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: Hat every teacher should know. doi
  89. (1987). Learner Strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology.
  90. (1992). Learner Training for Language Learning. doi
  91. (1982). Learning by Teaching: SelectedArticles on Writing and Teaching.
  92. (1983). Learning Strategies Utilized in Developing Listening and Speaking Skills in English as a Second Language. Rosslyn, Va: InterAmerica Research Associates.
  93. (1989). Learning to praise.
  94. (1990). Legitimizing peer response: A recycling project for placement essays. doi
  95. (2003). Linguistic and Rhetorical Features in Moroccan EFL Pupils' Narratives: A Longitudinal Study. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Rabat: Faculty of Education.
  96. (1990). Local Examination Syndicate International Examinations.
  97. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving.
  98. (1987). More "process": A luxury? An illusion? A millstone?
  99. (1985). Morocco's journey through English. A paper presented
  100. (1994). Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. doi
  101. (2003). Motivation as a socially mediated process. In
  102. (2004). Motivation in foreign language leaming. In
  103. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. doi
  104. (1991). Motivation: re-opening the research agenda. doi
  105. (1992). Native and nonnative reactions to ESL compositions. doi
  106. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. doi
  107. (1983). New starts and different kinds of failure.
  108. (1995). Not tension but intention: A response to Wong's analysis of the researcher/teacher. doi
  109. (1967). On teaching composition: Some hypotheses and definitions.
  110. (2004). Patterns of engagement: dialogic features and L2 undergraduate writing. In doi
  111. (1996). Patterns of NNS student annotations when identifying areas of concern in their writing. doi
  112. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? doi
  113. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? doi
  114. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretical foundations and new Directions. doi
  115. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Classrooms. Ann Arbor:
  116. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. doi
  117. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? doi
  118. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Socialcognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. doi
  119. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process.
  120. Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes.
  121. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability of a foreign language anxiety scale: doi
  122. (1985). Problems of writing composition in EFL: A contrastive rhetoric approach.
  123. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. doi
  124. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. doi
  125. (1995). Process vs. Product Writing: between Theory and Practice in Moroccan High Schools.
  126. (1990). Providing productive feedback. doi
  127. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: .4 social constructivist approach. Cambridge: doi
  128. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills: doi
  129. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL. doi
  130. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing andAttitude Measurement.
  131. (1994). Questionnaire Design: a Practical Introduction.
  132. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together. doi
  133. Raising audience awareness in EAP writing.
  134. (1997). Re-seeing research on response. doi
  135. (2002). Reading Critically Writing Welk A Reader and Guide. Boston (6h edn.
  136. (1990). Reading Ethnographic Research: A Critical Guide.
  137. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. doi
  138. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. doi
  139. (2001). Reflections and refractions on the JSLw special issue on voice. doi
  140. (1992). Research and the Teacher: A Qualitative Introduction to School-based Research. London &
  141. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: doi
  142. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. doi
  143. (1990). Responding to problems in written English using a student self. monitoring technique. ELTJournal 44/4: doi
  144. (1985). Responding to student writing. doi
  145. (2003). Responding to writing. doi
  146. (1993). Response to writing: Using feedback to inform the writing process. In
  147. (1976). Rethinking case study: notes from the second Cambridge Conference. doi
  148. (1986). Revising in Spanish and English as a second language: a processoriented study of composition (Doctoral dissertation,
  149. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing.
  150. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. doi
  151. (1985). Revision, addition, and the power of the unseen text.
  152. (1987). Rhetoric and Reality: Writing instruction in American Colleges, doi
  153. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. doi
  154. Saudi Students' Revising Strategies in Arabic and English Essays. Unpublished Ph.
  155. (1991). Scoring procedures for ESL contexts.
  156. (1976). Second language acquisition: a social psychological perspective. doi
  157. (1988). Second Language Classrooms: Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: doi
  158. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions doi
  159. (1980). Self-provided and peer-provided feedback. doi
  160. (1990). Sharing words: The effects of readers on developing writers. doi
  161. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. doi
  162. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition Classrooms. doi
  163. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System 21/2: 193-204. Ennaj i, M. 199 1. Aspects of multilingualism in the Maghreb. doi
  164. (1980). Study modes and students from the Middle East. ELTDocuments 109, the British Council,
  165. (1996). Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: doi
  166. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. doi
  167. (1989). Teacher-as-reader: Oral feedback on ESL student writing.
  168. (1996). Teachers as course developers. In doi
  169. (2003). Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkil for Higher Education. London and
  170. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. doi
  171. (1985). Teaching andAssessing Writing.
  172. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language PedagoV (2 nd edn. ) San Francisco State
  173. (1976). Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: What we can learn from research in the teaching of English. doi
  174. (1980). Teaching English as a Foreign Language (2 nd edn. ) London, Henley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  175. (1986). Teaching English as academic discourse in secondary and higher education.
  176. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. doi
  177. (1968). Teaching Foreign Language Skills. doi
  178. (2001). Teaching Writing for Academic Purposes. doi
  179. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. doi
  180. (1988). The Action research planner (3'd cdn.
  181. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: messages from a physics method class. doi
  182. (1999). The case for "The case against grammar correction in L2 Writing classes": A response to Ferris. doi
  183. (2000). The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry. In doi
  184. (1978). The Case-study Method in Social Inquiry. doi
  185. (1968). The Complexities of an Urban Classroom. doi
  186. (1983). The Composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. doi
  187. (1983). The composing process of an engineer. doi
  188. (1979). The Composing processes of unskilled college writers.
  189. (1984). The Development of English Writing Skills by
  190. (1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. doi
  191. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. doi
  192. (1986). The effect of induced anxiety on the denotative and interpretative content of second language speech. doi
  193. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. doi
  194. (1973). The Effectiveness of Tape Recorded Evaluations of Composition Written by Seventh and eighth Grade Students. Unpublished Ph.
  195. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. doi
  196. (1990). The effects of peer and self-feedback.
  197. (1984). The effects of the red pen. doi
  198. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. doi
  199. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. doi
  200. (2003). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research (2 "d edn.
  201. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. doi
  202. (1993). The implications of cognitive models in LI and L2 writing. doi
  203. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. doi
  204. (1985). The origins of metacognition. In
  205. (1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students' communicative power.
  206. (1987). The process religion and business communication. doi
  207. (1970). The Research Act in Sociology. doi
  208. (2000). The Research Interview.
  209. (1984). The role of repetition in Arabic argumentative discourse.
  210. (1997). The sociology of Berber: change and continuity. doi
  211. (1986). The Structure of Written Communication: Studies in Reciprocity between Writers and Readers. doi
  212. (1989). The student, the teacher, and the text: negotiating meanings through response and revision.
  213. (1999). The teaching of process writing.
  214. (1993). The Use of Arabic in the Composing Processes ofArab
  215. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In
  216. (1989). The use of the tape recorder in an ESL composition programme.
  217. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. doi
  218. (1995). TheArt ofCase Study.
  219. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing. doi
  220. (1996). Tutoring second language text revision: does the approach to instruction or language communication make a difference? doi
  221. (1998). Undergraduates Arguing a Case. doi
  222. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. doi
  223. Understanding ESL writers. doi
  224. (1997). University EFL Teachers' Written Feedback on Compositions and Students'Reactions. Unpublished Ph.
  225. (2003). Using Research Instruments. London and doi
  226. (1992). Validity in educational research. doi
  227. (1987). Why case studies? Reflections on Hord and Hall's three imagcs. doi
  228. (1964). Writer's cramp and eyestrain - are they paying off? doi
  229. (1985). Writers' Knowledge andProcess ofComposing.
  230. (1992). Writing as a Personal Product.
  231. (1992). Writing groups and the less proficient ESL student.
  232. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. doi
  233. (1973). Writing Without Teachers. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.