Location of Repository

A study of English learning attitudes and perceptions among senior high school students in Taiwan

By I-Fang Chung

Abstract

This three-phase, sequential mixed methods study explores two aspects of communicative language teaching in Taiwanese senior high schools. Firstly, it examines the extent to which the communicative approach is implemented in the English classroom in Taiwan and secondly it investigates the attitudes of senior high school students towards their learning of English at school.\ud \ud This research study employed the dominant-less dominant mixed method design, with a combination of a dominant qualitative approach and a less-dominant qualitative data aggregation procedure.\ud \ud Results from the focus group interviews are mostly consistent with those of the classroom observations. The findings revealed that the traditional approach, which focuses on the teaching of vocabulary, grammar and the explanation of the textbook contents, still prevailed in the English classroom. Teachers’ classroom practices reflected students’ current learning purpose, which is to achieve good exam results, as revealed in the focus group interviews.\ud \ud The questionnaire survey found that despite their pressing need to “pass exams”, the majority of students had positive attitudes communicative activities in class, believing that the best way of learning English is to be able to use it in real situations outside of the classroom. Nevertheless, students exhibited contradictory attitudes in that they showed inhibitions about speaking or participating actively in class, even though they had the belief that English is best learned through speaking. Finally, the data analysis revealed that some variables, such as “gender” and “major”, played important roles in influencing learner attitudes towards English learning at school. On the other hand, there was little relationship between the variables “programme” and “mother tongue” and learner attitudes in this study

Topics: LB1603, PE
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2449

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Research (3 rd edition).
  2. (1993). a. Maximizing learning potential in the communicative classroom. doi
  3. (2004). An introduction of the national and private senior high schools in Ping-Tung County, Taiwan. h ttp.,
  4. (1996). An Introduction to Survey Research, Polling, and Data Analysis.
  5. (2005). An Investigation of Students' Attitudes and Perceptions of Communicative Language Teaching: through focus group interviews. Unpublished study,
  6. and ST Gaies 1999. Investigating Japanese leamers'beliefs about language leaming. doi
  7. (1994). Appropriate Methodology and Social Context Cambridge: doi
  8. (2000). Asian students' reticence revisited. doi
  9. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. doi
  10. (2002). Attitudes andAttitude Change. East Sussex,
  11. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. London and doi
  12. (2002). Chinese students' perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. doi
  13. (1989). Chinese teachers'views of western language teaching: context informs paradigms. doi
  14. (1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioural components of attitudes.
  15. (2003). Communicative language learning in EFL contexts: leamer attitudes and perceptions. doi
  16. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): practical understandings. doi
  17. (2001). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: leamer attitudes in Taiwan. doi
  18. (1987). Communicative language teaching: making it work. ELTJournal 41/2: doi
  19. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. doi
  20. (2001). Communicative language teaching. In doi
  21. (1983). Communicative reading. In
  22. (1998). Conducting Educational Research: A Comparative View. doi
  23. (1996). Cultures of learning: language classrooms in China. In doi
  24. (1984). Designing questionnaires.
  25. (2000). Developing a Questionnaire. London and New York: Continuum. Gorard S. 200 1. Quantitative Methods in Educational Research: the role of numbers made easy. London and
  26. (2000). Do Asian students really want to listen and obey? doi
  27. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research doi
  28. (2003). Doing Survey Research: a guide to quantitative methods.
  29. (2000). Focus Groups: a practical guidefor applied research (3 rd edition). Thousand Oaks:
  30. (1990). Focus Groups: theory andpractice.
  31. (1989). Focus on the Language Learner: approaches to identifying and meeting the needs of second language learners.
  32. (1993). From leaming-centeredness to leamer-centeredness.
  33. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? doi
  34. (1999). How good are we at knowing what learners like? doi
  35. (2001). How to Research. doi
  36. (2001). Implementing English Teaching in Primary School and Evaluation of Syllabus. Taiwan: Taiwan Ministry of Education.
  37. (1977). Influencing Attitudes and Changing Behaviour: an introduction to method, theoty, and applications of social control and personal power (2 d edition). London and Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  38. (2002). Innovative teaching in foreign language contexts: the case of Taiwan.
  39. (1999). Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups. doi
  40. (1993). Is a communicative approach practical for teaching English in China? Pros and cons. doi
  41. (1998). It's always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers' perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. doi
  42. (2001). Language teaching approaches: an overview. doi
  43. (1996). Leamer resistance to innovation in classroom methodology.
  44. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: the case of task-based instruction. doi
  45. (1997). Managing Curricular Innovation. Cambridge:
  46. (2001). Managing the learning process. In doi
  47. (1993). Materials and Methods in ELT a teacher's guide. doi
  48. (1998). Mixed Methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, doi
  49. (1989). Multimethod Research: A synthesis of styles. doi
  50. (1972). On communicative competence. doi
  51. (1993). Planning and Accomplishing School-Centred Evaluation. doi
  52. (2002). Practical understandings of communicative language teaching and Teacher development. doi
  53. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: theory andpractice 8/3/4: doi
  54. (1988). Quantity and quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman. 200 1. Social Research Methods. doi
  55. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issuesfOrfield settings.
  56. (1986). Queries from a communicative teacher. doi
  57. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing andAttitude Measurement.
  58. (2002). Real World Research (2 nd edition).
  59. (1995). Research and the Teacher: a qualitative introduction to school-based research (2 d edition). London and doi
  60. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London and Thousand Oak,
  61. (1994). Research Design: QuaUtative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks,
  62. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. doi
  63. (1986). Social Psychology: Attitudes, Cognition and Social Behaviour. Cambridge: doi
  64. (1983). Some issues in communicative language teaching and their relevance to the teaching of languages in secondary schools.
  65. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. doi
  66. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 12 (2 nd edition). doi
  67. (2002). SPSSfor Social Scientists.
  68. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. doi
  69. (2002). Teacher education for cumcular innovation in Japan.
  70. (2002). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3 rd edition).
  71. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. doi
  72. (2001). The development of EFL methodology.
  73. (2003). The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. doi
  74. (2001). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. In doi
  75. (1988). The Learner-Centred Curriculum. Cambridge: doi
  76. (1993). The Psychology ofAttitudes. Fort Worth and London: doi
  77. (2002). The use of technology in high-enrollment courses: implications for teacher education and communicative language teaching.
  78. (2002). The washback effect on classroom teaching of changes in public examinations. doi
  79. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. doi
  80. (1989). tw1ch in eselhom elm ainframe. asp ? I=] 40&Ax=.. Iorganlsch oollindex. htm Raffe,
  81. (1989). twltaiwan-websitel5-gplyearbooklp2 76. htm I
  82. (1995). Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: doi
  83. (1996). Using attitudes scales to investigate teachers' attitudes to the communicative approach. ELTJournal 50/3: doi
  84. (2003). Using Focus Groups in Research. Continuum:
  85. (1999). Using Questionnaires in Small-Scale Research: a teacher's guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
  86. (2001). Using Surveys in Language Programes. Cambridge:
  87. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? doi
  88. (2002). Zen and the art of English language teaching.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.