Bragg, Christopher Mark

Choppin, Simon

Collins, Karen

Crank, Helen

Langley, Joe

Probst, Heidi

Reed, Heath

Rosbottom, Keeley

Stanton, Andrew

Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive

Using 3D stereophotogrammetry to evaluate the stability, and positional accuracy of a breast immobilisation deviceROSBOTTOM, Keeley, PROBST, Heidi, CHOPPIN, Simon, BRAGG, Christopher Mark, COLLINS, Karen, CRANK, Helen, REED, Heath, STANTON, Andrew and LANGLEY, JoeAvailable from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at:http://shura.shu.ac.uk/12641/This document is the author deposited version.  You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.Published versionROSBOTTOM, Keeley, PROBST, Heidi, CHOPPIN, Simon, BRAGG, Christopher Mark, COLLINS, Karen, CRANK, Helen, REED, Heath, STANTON, Andrew and LANGLEY, Joe (2016). Using 3D stereophotogrammetry to evaluate the stability, and positional accuracy of a breast immobilisation device. In: UK Radiation Oncology Conference, Liverpool, 6-8 June 2016. (Unpublished) Repository use policyCopyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in SHURA to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain.Sheffield Hallam University Research Archivehttp://shura.shu.ac.ukUsing 3D stereophotogrammetry to evaluate the stability, and positional accuracy of a breast immobilisation device  Keeley Rosbottom, Prof. Heidi Probst, Dr. Simon Choppin, Dr. Chris Bragg, Prof. Karen Collins, Dr. Helen Crank, Heath Read, Andrew Stanton, Joe Langley, Sheffield Hallam University Background • Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women globally, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases diagnosed in 20121.   • Developments in radiotherapy treatment complexity require more accurate breast stabilisation. The rationale supports the evaluation of a novel bra (S4A bra) created by the SuPPORT 4 All study team.  • 3D stereophotogrammetry (3dMD) is a non-invasive system with the potential to evaluate breast positional accuracy within the S4A bra in relation to anatomical landmarks2 ahead of a clinical feasibility study. Aims & Objectives 1. To assess if 3dMD is a useful tool to establish the capabilities of the S4A bra outside of the clinical setting.  2. To investigate the capability of the S4A bra compared to no bra to accurately reproduce breast shape and position after repeated placement.           Image 3 shows the change in breast tissue placement after repeated images when wearing no bra.          Image 4 shows the change in breast tissue placement after repeated images when wearing the S4A bra. Further participants will be scanned until a total of twenty cases with repeated images are available for analysis.   Conclusion Indications are that 3dMD scanning maybe a suitable method for assessing set up accuracy of new immobilisation devices prior to introduction to clinical practice as part of the product development process. References 1. ttp://globocan.iarc.fr/old/FactSheets/cancers/breast-new.asp last accessed 11/03/16 2. Wheat JS, Choppin S, Goyal A. Development and assessment of a Microsoft Kinect based system for imaging the breast in three dimensions. Medical Engineering & Physics 2014;36:732–7. 38  Image 1: Anatomical landmarks used to identify  positional movements of breast tissue .   In Wheat et al (2014) p734. Image 2: 3dMD camera configuration to  acquire images: Authors original image. http://www.support4all.org.uk        Methods Four surface scanning images of a healthy volunteer were taken: 2   of repeated bra fittings when wearing the S4A bra, and 2 when the participant wore no bra.  This allowed direct comparisons to be made. Results Presented are the results for a single case as an example. Positional movements of breast tissue (measured in mm), and changes in breast shape were assessed. Table 1 shows the differences between breast placement over  2 repeated images without and with the S4A bra.         The images show the +/-5mm deviation analysis of 2 repeated images overlaid: green colour wash indicates 3mm deviation. Red  shows a +5mm error and blue a  -5mm error.  k.rosbottom@shu.ac.uk This work is funded by the  National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)  Invention for Innovation Programme  (programme grant number: II-LA-0214-20001) Average Distance (AD)  in mm AD + AD  - No bra -0.8 3.6 4.1 S4A bra 1.8 5.7 3.7 Table 1: Comparison of deviation from 2 overlaid images No Bra S4A Bra 

Using 3D stereophotogrammetry to evaluate the stability, and positional accuracy of a breast immobilisation device

Using 3D stereophotogrammetry to evaluate the stability, and positional accuracy of a breast immobilisation device

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive