We have been recently faced with the problem of cross--identifying stars
recorded in historical catalogues with those extracted from recent fully
digitized surveys (such as DENIS and 2MASS). Positions mentioned in the old
catalogues are frequently of poor precision, but are generally accompanied by
finding charts where the interesting objects are flagged. Those finding charts
are sometimes our only link with the accumulated knowledge of past literature.
While checking the identification of some of these objects in several
catalogues, we had the surprise to discover a number of discrepancies in recent
works.The main reason for these discrepancies was generally the blind
application of the smallest difference in position as the criterion to identify
sources from one historical catalogue to those in more recent surveys. In this
paper we give examples of such misidentifications, and show how we were able to
find and correct them.We present modern procedures to discover and solve
cross--identification problems, such as loading digitized images of the sky
through the Aladin service at CDS, and overlaying entries from historical
catalogues and modern surveys. We conclude that the use of good finding charts
still remains the ultimate (though time--consuming) tool to ascertain
cross--identifications in difficult cases.Comment: 4 pages, 1 figure, accepted by A&
