Ibrom, Andreas

Pilegaard, Kim

Online Research Database In Technology

                       General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.  • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal   If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.     Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 20, 2017Empirical CO2 and H2O flux uncertainty estimation through comparison ofmeasurements from two heightsIbrom, Andreas; Pilegaard, KimPublished in:Geophysical Research AbstractsPublication date:2012Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordLink back to DTU OrbitCitation (APA):Ibrom, A., & Pilegaard, K. (2012). Empirical CO2 and H2O flux uncertainty estimation through comparison ofmeasurements from two heights. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 14, EGU2012-9768.Geophysical Research AbstractsVol. 14, EGU2012-9768, 2012EGU General Assembly 2012© Author(s) 2012Empirical CO2 and H2O flux uncertainty estimation through comparisonof measurements from two heightsA. Ibrom and K. PilegaardDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, DTU, Lyngby/Roskilde, DenmarkAlthough the eddy covariance technique is the only direct method to measure the turbulent matter flux through theatmospheric boundary-layer, the flux values are only reasonable approximations of the flux from the underlyingsurface to the atmosphere, if a couple of criteria are fulfilled. Most of these criteria, such as flux constancy overthe averaging period, statistical stationarity of the time series, surface homogeneity, and height constancy of theflux, are in real world situations only partly fulfilled. Compromises between the measurement conditions and thetheory of flux measurements will therefore introduce a yet unknown error, which is difficult to estimate by meansof theory. Here we study whether and how eddy covariance measurements from two heights that are close toeach other can be used to estimate at least part of the flux uncertainty and its relation to meteorological and siteconditions.One month of data was collected during December 2011 over the Danish beech forest site Sorø, Zealand, at 34and 43 m height. The EC systems were virtually identical and were logged with the same data logging system.The highest trees were 30 m tall, the sum of displacement height and roughness length was ca. 20 m depending onwind speed. The fetch of forest area varied between 0.5 km and 1.6 km depending on direction (Pilegaard et al.2011). It could be shown that both the spectral characteristics and even the absolute concentration measurment ofthe two infra read gas analysers were in very close agreement with the theory.We found usually a very good match of the flux estimates from the two systems during day time. During night timedifferences were largest at stable stratification but as well at very high wind speeds. In addition to addressing theresulting uncertainty for winter CO2 flux estimates at this site, we analysed periods when very strong differencesbetween the systems occurred. During these periods the comparison indicated a flux divergence possibly asa consequence of the tall but aerodynamically transparent leafless winter canopy and the, depending on winddirection, sometimes close vicinity of forest edges. Finally, we used the findings from this study to derive empiricalthresholds of meteorological variables for detecting periods with large flux uncertainty.From this investigation we conclude that estimating turbulent matter and energy fluxes at two relativelyclose heights gives very useful empirical information on the uncertainty of flux measurements with the eddycovariance method.Acknowledgement:This study has been supported by the Danish ICOS preparation project.References:Pilegaard, K., A. Ibrom, M. S. Courtney, P. Hummelshøj and N. O. Jensen (2011). Increasing net CO2 uptake by aDanish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151: 934–946.

Empirical CO2 and H2O flux uncertainty estimation through comparison of measurements from two heights

http://orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/10376622/EGU2012_9768.pdf

Empirical CO2 and H2O flux uncertainty estimation through comparison of measurements from two heights

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research Database In Technology