Banks

CASE

Constitutional Assembly

De Koker

Department of Labour South Africa

Eide

Elwan

Frye

Graham

Groce

Hagemejer

International Centre for Evidence in Disability (ICED)

International Labour Office & International Disability Alliance

Kabeer

Loeb

Mitra

Nattrass

SASSA

South African Department of Social Development

Standing

Statistics South Africa (Stats SA)

United Nations (UN)

World Health Organization & World Bank

Background: People with disabilities are at increased risk of poverty, particularly in low-and middle-income countries. However, recent evidence suggests that this association is more nuanced than previously anticipated and that we need better data to understand the opportunity and out-of-pocket costs that diverse groups of people with disabilities may experience.Objective: This paper discusses if disability is associated with opportunity cost and loss of income both on the individual and household level in South Africa, and if these costs differ depending on disability type and severity.Methods: For this purpose, the paper analyses General Household Survey 2011 data (people between 15 and 59) using descriptive statistics disaggregated via disability type and severity. The paper also assesses if social grants counteract these costs and reduce economic vulnerability.Results: The analysis of the data reveals that people with disabilities are affected by issues relating to multidimensional poverty such as lower educational attainment and fewer employment opportunities. In addition, households of people with disabilities (with the exception of milder visual problems) earn significantly less than households without people with disabilities, and this particularly applies to households with people with severe disabilities. This vulnerability also varies by disability type. The country’s social protection mechanisms, in terms of social grants, counteract economic vulnerability to some extent but do not consider the nuanced economic impact of diverse conditions nor the increased out-of-pocket costs related to disability.Conclusions: This calls for more equitable social protection mechanisms that include accessible services, livelihood programmes and disability benefits.</jats:p

Jill Hanass-Hancock

Tamlyn C. McKenzie

Crossref

African Journal of Disability

People with disabilities and income-related social protection measures in South Africa: Where is the gap?

https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod/article/download/300/693

People with disabilities and income-related social protection measures in South Africa: Where is the gap?

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref