Aiken

Beach

Berscheid

Boldero

Buunk

Campbell

Cronbach

Fehr

Fiske

Fletcher

Francis

GagnÃ©

Guttman

Haslam

Higgins

Peters

Robins

Shah

Simpson

Stanton-Salazar

Tesser

Thibaut

Traub

Walster

Winsberg

Young

Asian Journal Of Social Psychology

English

Boldero, Jennifer M.

Robins, Garry L.

Williams, Benedict J.

Francis, Jillian

Hampton, Anne

Fourie, Annabelle J.

Research Archive

A basis for analysing test-retest reliability.

Adolescent peer networks as a context for social and emotional support.

Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships.

Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review.

Categories of social relationship.

Close Relationships

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

Expectancy*value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction.

Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships.

Ideals in intimate relationships.

Ideals, oughts, and self-regulation: Are the qualitatively distinct self-guides?

Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development.

Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interactionpattern model.

Monotone transformations to additivity using splines.

Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks,

New directions in equity research.

Pleasure and pain in doing well together: An investigation of performancerelated affect in close relationships.

Regression with qualitative and quantitative variables: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling.

Relational discrepancy theory: The implications of selfdiscrepancy theory for dyadic relationships and for the emergence of social structure.

Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis.

Reliability for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,

Self-discrepancy and emotion in the workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In

Self-esteem and the extended self-evaluation maintenance model. In

Self-lines: A new, psychometrically sound, ‘user-friendly’ idiographic technique for assessing selfdiscrepancies.

Similarity and uniqueness focus: A paper tiger and a surprise.

Structures of social life: The four elemental forms of social relationship.

The association between relational discrepancies and emotion: Investigating the moderating role of hierarchy in dyads within sporting teams. Relational discrepancies and emotion Unpublished psychology honours thesis,

The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.

The nature of the relationship between remarried individuals and former spouses and its impact on marital satisfaction.

The social psychology of groups.

The structure and function of ideal standards in close relationships. In

When do self-discrepancies have specific relations to emotions? The second-generation question of Tangney,

When fairness is especially important: Reactions to being inequitably paid in communal relationships.

Relational discrepancies and emotion : The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

Crossref

Relational discrepancies and emotion: The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

Relational discrepancy theory proposes that discrepancies in the extents to which relational partners meet relational standards are associated with emotions and that perceiving relationships in specified ways moderates associations. In a range of relationships, ideal relational discrepancies were associated with dejection and ought relational discrepancies with agitation (Study 1), associations moderated by relationship type. Discrepancy valence also moderated ideal discrepancy associations. Similar associations were found in friendships, moderated by relationship type (Study 2). Finally, relationship type and valence moderated associations in relationships with supervisors but not with colleagues (Study 3). These results support relational discrepancy theory propositions

Francis, Jillian J.

Swinburne Research Bank

Relational discrepancies and emotion: the moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

https://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/2164/785/1/Boldero%202009.pdf

Relational discrepancies and emotion : The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Research Archive

Crossref

Swinburne Research Bank