We constructed a Bayesian hyper-parameter statistical method to quantify the
difference between predicted velocities derived from the observed galaxy
distribution in the \textit{IRAS}-PSCz redshift survey and peculiar
velocities measured using different distance indicators. In our analysis we
find that the model--data comparison becomes unreliable beyond 70 \hmpc
because of the inadequate sampling by \textit{IRAS} survey of prominent,
distant superclusters, like the Shapley Concentration. On the other hand, the
analysis of the velocity residuals show that the PSCz gravity field provides
an adequate model to the local, \le 70 \hmpc, peculiar velocity field. The
hyper-parameter combination of ENEAR, SN, A1SN and SFI++ catalogues in the
Bayesian framework constrains the amplitude of the linear flow to be
β=0.53±0.014. For an rms density fluctuations in the PSCz galaxy
number density σ8gal=0.42±0.03, we obtain an estimate of the
growth rate of density fluctuations fσ8(z∼0)=0.42±0.033,
which is in excellent agreement with independent estimates based on different
techniques.Comment: 14 pages, 32 figures, MNRAS in press, matched the MNRAS published
versio