Bhattacharya, Siladitya

Black, Mairead Eileen

Cumming, Grant P

Peddie, Valerie L.

Whitelaw, Natalie

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

English

PubMed

Background



The United Kingdom (UK) caesarean section (CS) rate is largely determined by reluctance to augment trial of labour and vaginal birth. Choice between repeat CS and attempting vaginal birth after CS (VBAC) in the next pregnancy is challenging, with neither offering clear safety advantages. Women may access online information during the decision-making process. Such information is known to vary in its support for either mode of birth when assessed quantitatively. Therefore, we sought to explore qualitatively, the content and presentation of web-based health care information on birth after caesarean section (CS) in order to identify the dominant messages being conveyed.





Methods



The search engine Google™ was used to conduct an internet search using terms relating to birth after CS. The ten most frequently returned websites meeting relevant purposive sampling criteria were analysed. Sampling criteria were based upon funding source, authorship and intended audience. Images and written textual content together with presence of links to additional media or external web content were analysed using descriptive and thematic analyses respectively.





Results



Ten websites were analysed: five funded by Government bodies or professional membership; one via charitable donations, and four funded commercially. All sites compared the advantages and disadvantages of both repeat CS and VBAC. Commercially funded websites favoured a question and answer format alongside images, ‘pop-ups’, social media forum links and hyperlinks to third-party sites. The relationship between the parent sites and those being linked to may not be readily apparent to users, risking perception of endorsement of either VBAC or repeat CS whether intended or otherwise. Websites affiliated with Government or health services presented referenced clinical information in a factual manner with podcasts of real life experiences. Many imply greater support for VBAC than repeat CS although this was predominantly conveyed through subtle use of words rather than overt messages, with the exception of the latter being apparent in one site.





Conclusions



Websites providing information on birth after CS appear to vary in nature of content according to their funding source. The most user-friendly, balanced and informative websites appear to be those funded by government agencies

Cumming, Grant P.

Black, Mairead

Online Research @ Cardiff

Qualitative website analysis of information on birth after caesarean section

Valerie L. Peddie

Natalie Whitelaw

Grant P. Cumming

Siladitya Bhattacharya

Mairead Black

Crossref

Aberdeen University Research

Springer - Publisher Connector

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0614-0

Qualitative website analysis of information on birth after caesarean section

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research @ Cardiff

Crossref

Aberdeen University Research

Springer - Publisher Connector