CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Hired Guns: Local Government Mergers in New South Wales and the KPMG Modelling Report
Authors
Abelson
Bevir
+44 more
Boston
Craft
Dallinger
Deloitte Access Economics (DAE)
Department of Infrastructure and Planning
Dolfsma
Dollery
Dollery
Drew
Drew
Drew
Drew
Drew
Drew
Dur
Ernst and Young
Gregory
Halligan
Howlett
Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP)
Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP)
Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART)
Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART)
Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART)
Jeff Tate Consulting
KPMG
KPMG
KPMG
Local Government Remuneration Tribunal
Mueller
NSW Local Government Grants Commission
Office of Local Government (OLG)
Office of Local Government (OLG)
Office of Local Government (OLG)
Office of Local Government (OLG)
Queensland Treasury Corporation
Sansom
Steiner
TCorp
Toole
Vesely
Wallis
Weller
Wolf
Publication date
1 September 2017
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
© 2017 CPA Australia Across the developed world, including Australia, public policymaking now rests heavily on commissioned reports generated by for-profit consultants, contrasting starkly with the earlier customary reliance on the civil service to provide informed policy advice to political decision makers. Dependence on commercial consultants is problematic, especially given the moral hazards involved in ‘hired guns’ providing support for policy ‘solutions’ desired by their political paymasters. This paper provides a vivid illustration of some of the dangers flowing from the use of consultants by examining the methodology employed by KPMG in its empirical analysis of the pecuniary consequences of proposed municipal mergers as part of the New South Wales’ (NSW) Government's Fit for the Future local government reform program. We show that the KPMG (2016) modelling methodology is awash with errors which render its conclusions on the financial viability of the NSW merger proposals fatally flawed
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
OPUS - University of Technology Sydney
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/...
Last time updated on 13/02/2017
Research UNE
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:rune.une.edu.au:1959.11/22...
Last time updated on 09/08/2023
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1111%2Fauar.12163
Last time updated on 10/12/2019