Defects in Halide Perovskites: Does It Help to Switch from 3D to 2D?

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) organic–inorganic hybrid iodide perovskites have been put forward in recent years as stable alternatives to their three-dimensional (3D) counterparts. Using first-principles calculations, we demonstrate that equilibrium concentrations of point defects in the 2D perovskites PEA2PbI4, BA2PbI4, and PEA2SnI4 (PEA, phenethylammonium; BA, butylammonium) are much lower than in comparable 3D perovskites. Bonding disruptions by defects are more destructive in 2D than in 3D networks, making defect formation energetically more costly. The stability of 2D Sn iodide perovskites can be further enhanced by alloying with Pb. Should, however, point defects emerge in sizable concentrations as a result of nonequilibrium growth conditions, for instance, then those defects likely hamper the optoelectronic performance of the 2D perovskites, as they introduce deep traps. We suggest that trap levels are responsible for the broad sub-bandgap emission in 2D perovskites observed in experiments