ANSTEN KLEV

Avigad

Barnes

Betti

Blumenthal

Bolzano

Breckenridge

Carnap

Corry

Dedekind

Dirichlet

Dugac

Ferreirós

Fine

Frege

Gauss

Hacker

Halbfass

Hallett

Heck

Hilbert

Husserl

Keferstein

Kelly

Kleene

Lafuma

Lambert

Leśniewski

Locke

Martin-Löf

Mehrtens

Oeing-Hanhoff

Pasch

Petri

Quine

Schlick

Scholz

Schröder

Sieg

Steck

Stein

Sundholm

Tait

Wittgenstein

Klev, A.M.

Leiden University Scholary Publications

Dedekind and Hilbert on the foundations of the deductive sciences

NARCIS 

We offer an interpretation of the words and works of Richard Dedekind and the David Hilbert of around 1900 on which they are held to entertain diverging views on the structure of a deductive science. Firstly, it is argued that Dedekind sees the beginnings of a science in concepts, whereas Hilbert sees such beginnings in axioms. Secondly, it is argued that for Dedekind, the primitive terms of a science are substantive terms whose sense is to be conveyed by elucidation, whereas Hilbert dismisses elucidation and consequently treats the primitives as schematic.</jats:p

Crossref

The Review of Symbolic Logic

DEDEKIND AND HILBERT ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE DEDUCTIVE SCIENCES

https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2888869/download

Dedekind and Hilbert on the foundations of the deductive sciences

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Leiden University Scholary Publications

NARCIS

Crossref