6,319 research outputs found
Parallel Algorithms for Geometric Graph Problems
We give algorithms for geometric graph problems in the modern parallel models
inspired by MapReduce. For example, for the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) problem
over a set of points in the two-dimensional space, our algorithm computes a
-approximate MST. Our algorithms work in a constant number of
rounds of communication, while using total space and communication proportional
to the size of the data (linear space and near linear time algorithms). In
contrast, for general graphs, achieving the same result for MST (or even
connectivity) remains a challenging open problem, despite drawing significant
attention in recent years.
We develop a general algorithmic framework that, besides MST, also applies to
Earth-Mover Distance (EMD) and the transportation cost problem. Our algorithmic
framework has implications beyond the MapReduce model. For example it yields a
new algorithm for computing EMD cost in the plane in near-linear time,
. We note that while recently Sharathkumar and Agarwal
developed a near-linear time algorithm for -approximating EMD,
our algorithm is fundamentally different, and, for example, also solves the
transportation (cost) problem, raised as an open question in their work.
Furthermore, our algorithm immediately gives a -approximation
algorithm with space in the streaming-with-sorting model with
passes. As such, it is tempting to conjecture that the
parallel models may also constitute a concrete playground in the quest for
efficient algorithms for EMD (and other similar problems) in the vanilla
streaming model, a well-known open problem
On the Complexity of Local Distributed Graph Problems
This paper is centered on the complexity of graph problems in the
well-studied LOCAL model of distributed computing, introduced by Linial [FOCS
'87]. It is widely known that for many of the classic distributed graph
problems (including maximal independent set (MIS) and -vertex
coloring), the randomized complexity is at most polylogarithmic in the size
of the network, while the best deterministic complexity is typically
. Understanding and narrowing down this exponential gap
is considered to be one of the central long-standing open questions in the area
of distributed graph algorithms. We investigate the problem by introducing a
complexity-theoretic framework that allows us to shed some light on the role of
randomness in the LOCAL model. We define the SLOCAL model as a sequential
version of the LOCAL model. Our framework allows us to prove completeness
results with respect to the class of problems which can be solved efficiently
in the SLOCAL model, implying that if any of the complete problems can be
solved deterministically in rounds in the LOCAL model, we can
deterministically solve all efficient SLOCAL-problems (including MIS and
-coloring) in rounds in the LOCAL model. We show
that a rather rudimentary looking graph coloring problem is complete in the
above sense: Color the nodes of a graph with colors red and blue such that each
node of sufficiently large polylogarithmic degree has at least one neighbor of
each color. The problem admits a trivial zero-round randomized solution. The
result can be viewed as showing that the only obstacle to getting efficient
determinstic algorithms in the LOCAL model is an efficient algorithm to
approximately round fractional values into integer values
The history of degenerate (bipartite) extremal graph problems
This paper is a survey on Extremal Graph Theory, primarily focusing on the
case when one of the excluded graphs is bipartite. On one hand we give an
introduction to this field and also describe many important results, methods,
problems, and constructions.Comment: 97 pages, 11 figures, many problems. This is the preliminary version
of our survey presented in Erdos 100. In this version 2 only a citation was
complete
Non-Local Probes Do Not Help with Graph Problems
This work bridges the gap between distributed and centralised models of
computing in the context of sublinear-time graph algorithms. A priori, typical
centralised models of computing (e.g., parallel decision trees or centralised
local algorithms) seem to be much more powerful than distributed
message-passing algorithms: centralised algorithms can directly probe any part
of the input, while in distributed algorithms nodes can only communicate with
their immediate neighbours. We show that for a large class of graph problems,
this extra freedom does not help centralised algorithms at all: for example,
efficient stateless deterministic centralised local algorithms can be simulated
with efficient distributed message-passing algorithms. In particular, this
enables us to transfer existing lower bound results from distributed algorithms
to centralised local algorithms
Exploiting -Closure in Kernelization Algorithms for Graph Problems
A graph is c-closed if every pair of vertices with at least c common
neighbors is adjacent. The c-closure of a graph G is the smallest number such
that G is c-closed. Fox et al. [ICALP '18] defined c-closure and investigated
it in the context of clique enumeration. We show that c-closure can be applied
in kernelization algorithms for several classic graph problems. We show that
Dominating Set admits a kernel of size k^O(c), that Induced Matching admits a
kernel with O(c^7*k^8) vertices, and that Irredundant Set admits a kernel with
O(c^(5/2)*k^3) vertices. Our kernelization exploits the fact that c-closed
graphs have polynomially-bounded Ramsey numbers, as we show
On the Hardness of Partially Dynamic Graph Problems and Connections to Diameter
Conditional lower bounds for dynamic graph problems has received a great deal
of attention in recent years. While many results are now known for the
fully-dynamic case and such bounds often imply worst-case bounds for the
partially dynamic setting, it seems much more difficult to prove amortized
bounds for incremental and decremental algorithms. In this paper we consider
partially dynamic versions of three classic problems in graph theory. Based on
popular conjectures we show that:
-- No algorithm with amortized update time exists for
incremental or decremental maximum cardinality bipartite matching. This
significantly improves on the bound for sparse graphs
of Henzinger et al. [STOC'15] and bound of Kopelowitz,
Pettie and Porat. Our linear bound also appears more natural. In addition, the
result we present separates the node-addition model from the edge insertion
model, as an algorithm with total update time exists for the
former by Bosek et al. [FOCS'14].
-- No algorithm with amortized update time exists for
incremental or decremental maximum flow in directed and weighted sparse graphs.
No such lower bound was known for partially dynamic maximum flow previously.
Furthermore no algorithm with amortized update time
exists for directed and unweighted graphs or undirected and weighted graphs.
-- No algorithm with amortized update time exists
for incremental or decremental -approximating the diameter
of an unweighted graph. We also show a slightly stronger bound if node
additions are allowed. [...]Comment: To appear at ICALP'16. Abstract truncated to fit arXiv limit
Parallel Algorithms For Graph Problems
In this thesis we examine three problems in graph theory and propose efficient parallel algorithms for solving them. We also introduce a number of parallel algorithmic techniques
- …