120 research outputs found

    Model simulation.

    No full text
    <p>Simulated and observed hourly canopy conductance (<i>E</i><sub>c-H</sub>) for model validation using six sampled days in August and September. Observed data were presented as mean of the trees within the same species±SD.</p

    Tree size and transpiration.

    No full text
    <p>Relationship between daily canopy transpiration and DBH of individual trees of all investigated species.</p

    The sensitivity of canopy conductance.

    No full text
    <p>Relationship between sensitivity of canopy conductance to VPD (−d<i>G</i><sub>c</sub>/dlnVPD) and canopy conductance at VPD = 1 kPa (<i>G</i><sub>cref</sub>) under (A) all environmental conditions, (B) contrasting REW ranks and (C) different solar radiation (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>) levels. Data dots were from data in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0047882#pone-0047882-t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>.</p

    Influences of solar radiation and soil water over transpiration.

    No full text
    <p>Daily <i>E</i><sub>c</sub> in response to <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> (A) and the relationship between sums of daily transpiration and cumulative soil water depletion for each drying cycle between two consecutive rainfall events (B). The lines are the fitting curves for different species. (A) and (B) share the same legends. <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> for each species is denoted with subscripted first letter of the Latin name.</p

    Statistics of atmosphere variables.

    No full text
    <p>Significant differences (<i>P</i><0.05) among months are indicated by different upper lower case letters.</p

    Water supply and transpiration.

    No full text
    <p>A: Rainfall and soil water condition during the studied period. B: Comparison of average daily <i>E</i><sub>c</sub> among different months and species. Significant differences among months within the same species are indicated by upper different lower case letters. Vertical bars stand for S.E.. C: Progression of sap flux density (<i>J</i><sub>s</sub>) under different soil water conditions (REW>0.4 and REW<0.2) in comparison with contemporary VPD and <i>R</i><sub>s</sub>.</p

    Calibrated parameters for for species.

    No full text
    <p>Significant differences across species (<i>P</i><0.05) are indicated with upper lower case letters.</p

    Parameters and significance for under different soil moisture and radiation conditions.

    No full text
    <p>Data were given as mean of all sampled trees of the same species and S.E. in parenthesis.</p><p><i>R</i><sub>s</sub>: Solar radiation.</p>1<p>: Fitting curves run through <i>G</i><sub>c</sub> and VPD under entire REW and <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> range.</p><p>a,b,c,d: Significant difference of the parameter among species.</p

    VPD and transpiration.

    No full text
    <p>Relationship between daily canopy transpiration in relation to VPD under different solar radiation (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>) ranks with data on rainy days removed. Black dots represent average <i>E</i><sub>c</sub> values within every 0.2 kPa rank. If a rank has less than 3 data, this rank is not considered to reduce potential bias from lack of representativeness.</p

    Comparison of thickness (μm) in the layers of interest and total retina between pituitary adenoma patients and controls according to each quadrant and average of the entire layer.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of thickness (μm) in the layers of interest and total retina between pituitary adenoma patients and controls according to each quadrant and average of the entire layer.</p
    • …
    corecore