Next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to e+e−→H+γe^+e^-\to H+\gamma

The associated production of Higgs boson with a hard photon at lepton collider, i.e., $e^+e^-\to H\gamma$, is known to bear a rather small cross section in Standard Model, and can serve as a sensitive probe for the potential new physics signals. Similar to the loop-induced Higgs decay channels $H\to \gamma\gamma, Z\gamma$, the $e^+e^-\to H\gamma$ process also starts at one-loop order provided that the tiny electron mass is neglected. In this work, we calculate the next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD corrections to this associated $H+\gamma$ production process, which mainly stem from the gluonic dressing to the top quark loop. The QCD corrections are found to be rather modest at lower center-of-mass energy range ($\sqrt{s}<300$ GeV), thus of negligible impact on Higgs factory such as CEPC. Nevertheless, when the energy is boosted to the ILC energy range ($\sqrt{s}\approx 400$ GeV), QCD corrections may enhance the leading-order cross section by $20\%$. In any event, the $e^+e^-\to H\gamma$ process has a maximal production rate $\sigma_{\rm max}\approx 0.08$ fb around $\sqrt{s}= 250$ GeV, thus CEPC turns out to be the best place to look for this rare Higgs production process. In the high energy limit, the effect of NLO QCD corrections become completely negligible, which can be simply attributed to the different asymptotic scaling behaviors of the LO and NLO cross sections, where the former exhibits a milder decrement $\propto 1/s$ , but the latter undergoes a much faster decrease $\propto 1/s^2$.Comment: v4, 11 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables; errors in Appendix are fixed; version accepted for publication at PL

Short-range force between two Higgs bosons

The $S$-wave scattering length and the effective range of the Higgs boson in Standard Model are studied using effective-field-theory approach. After incorporating the first-order electroweak correction, the short-range force between two Higgs bosons remains weakly attractive for $M_H=126$ GeV. It is interesting to find that the force range is about two order-of-magnitude larger than the Compton wavelength of the Higgs boson, almost comparable with the typical length scale of the strong interaction.Comment: v2, 11 pages, 2 figures, the version accepted for publication in Phys. Lett.

Reconciling the nonrelativistic QCD prediction and the J/ψ→3γJ/\psi\to 3\gamma data

It has been a long-standing problem that the rare electromagnetic decay process $J/\psi\to 3\gamma$ is plagued with both large and negative radiative and relativistic corrections. To date it remains futile to make a definite prediction to confront with the branching fraction of $J/\psi\to 3\gamma$ recently measured by the \textsf{CLEO-c} and \textsf{BESIII} Collaborations. In this work, we investigate the joint perturbative and relativistic correction (i.e. the ${\mathcal O}(\alpha_s v^2)$ correction, where $v$ denotes the characteristic velocity of the charm quark inside the $J/\psi$) for this decay process, which turns out to be very significant. After incorporating the contribution from this new ingredient, with the reasonable choice of the input parameters, we are able to account for the measured decay rates in a satisfactory degree.Comment: 7 pages, 1 figure, version accepted for publication in PRD R

Next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to e+e−→J/ψ+ηce^+e^-\to J/\psi+\eta_c at BB factories

Within the nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) factorization framework, we compute the long-awaited ${\mathcal O}(\alpha_s^2)$ correction for the exclusive double charmonium production process at $B$ factories, i.e., $e^+e^-\to J/\psi+\eta_c$ at $\sqrt{s}=10.58$ GeV. For the first time, we confirm that NRQCD factorization does hold at next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) for exclusive double charmonium production. It is found that including the NNLO QCD correction greatly reduces the renormalization scale dependence, and also implies the reasonable perturbative convergence behavior for this process. Our state-of-the-art prediction is consistent with the BaBar measurement.Comment: 6 pages, 2 figures, 1 tabl

Can NRQCD explain the γγ∗→ηc\gamma\gamma^* \to \eta_c transition form factor data?

Unlike the bewildering situation in the $\gamma\gamma^*\to \pi$ form factor, a widespread view is that perturbative QCD can decently account for the recent \textsc{BaBar} measurement of $\gamma\gamma^*\to \eta_c$ transition form factor. The next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) perturbative correction to the $\gamma\gamma^*\to \eta_{c,b}$ form factor, is investigated in the NRQCD factorization framework for the first time. As a byproduct, we obtain by far the most precise order-$\alpha_s^2$ NRQCD matching coefficient for the $\eta_{c,b}\to \gamma\gamma$ process. After including the substantial negative order-$\alpha_s^2$ correction, the good agreement between NRQCD prediction and the measured $\gamma\gamma^*\to \eta_c$ form factor is completely ruined over a wide range of momentum transfer squared. This eminent discrepancy casts some doubts on the applicability of NRQCD approach to hard exclusive reactions involving charmonium.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures and 1 table; adding Eqs.(8) and (9) as well as some references, correcting errors in Table 1, updating Fig.3 to include the "light-by-light" contributions, devoting a paragraph to discuss why our strategy of interpreting the NNLO corrections is justified; Accepted by PR

Three-body interactions on a triangular lattice

We analyze the hard-core Bose-Hubbard model with both the three-body and nearest neighbor repulsions on the triangular lattice. The phase diagram is achieved by means of the semi-classical approximation and the quantum Monte Carlo simulation. For a system with only the three-body interactions, both the supersolid phase and one third solid disappear while the two thirds solid stably exists. As the thermal behavior of the bosons with nearest neighbor repulsion, the solid and the superfluid undergo the 3-state Potts and the Kosterlitz-Thouless type phase transitions, respectively. In a system with both the frustrated nearest neighbor two-body and three-body interactions, the supersolid and one third solid revive. By tuning the strength of the three-body interactions, the phase diagram is distorted, because the one-third solid and the supersolid are suppressed.Comment: 6 pages, 11 figure