57 research outputs found

    Associations between various factors and rod deformation at the concave side (°) using multiple stepwise linear regression analysis.

    No full text
    <p>Associations between various factors and rod deformation at the concave side (°) using multiple stepwise linear regression analysis.</p

    Implant rod angle of curvature at the concave and convex sides of the deformity.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) θ1 and θ2 at the concave side of each patients. (<b>B</b>) θ1 and θ2 at the convex side of each patients. (<b>C</b>) Comparison between θ1 and θ2 at the concave side. (<b>D</b>) Comparison between θ1 and θ2 at the convex side. (<b>E</b>) Comparison between Δθ at the concave side and Δθ at the convex side.</p

    Correlation analysis between rod deformation and variable in patients with rod deformation ≥14 ° at the concave side.

    No full text
    <p>Correlation analysis between rod deformation and variable in patients with rod deformation ≥14 ° at the concave side.</p

    Rod angle before and after implantation.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Prior to implantation, the surgeon traced the rod shapes on paper. The angle between the proximal and distal tangential line was measured (θ1). (<b>B</b>) Postoperative implant rod geometry (θ2) was obtained after the surgical operation using computed tomography.</p

    The location of a needle in the intervertebral disc was evaluated using micro-computed tomography scanning.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>a</b>) The punctured region was confirmed by multiplanar reconstruction views. (<b>b</b>) The punctured region was defined as the ventral (V), central (C), or dorsal (D) region.</p

    Correlation analysis between our histological score and MRI index.

    No full text
    <p>The blue, black, and red dots indicate the ventral, dorsal, and central region cases, respectively. Ovals indicate 50% confidence ellipse with bivariate normal distribution of each region.</p
    • …
    corecore