On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descent

Consider the consensus problem of minimizing $f(x)=\sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x)$ where each $f_i$ is only known to one individual agent $i$ out of a connected network of $n$ agents. All the agents shall collaboratively solve this problem and obtain the solution subject to data exchanges restricted to between neighboring agents. Such algorithms avoid the need of a fusion center, offer better network load balance, and improve data privacy. We study the decentralized gradient descent method in which each agent $i$ updates its variable $x_{(i)}$, which is a local approximate to the unknown variable $x$, by combining the average of its neighbors' with the negative gradient step $-\alpha \nabla f_i(x_{(i)})$. The iteration is $$x_{(i)}(k+1) \gets \sum_{\text{neighbor} j \text{of} i} w_{ij} x_{(j)}(k) - \alpha \nabla f_i(x_{(i)}(k)),\quad\text{for each agent} i,$$ where the averaging coefficients form a symmetric doubly stochastic matrix $W=[w_{ij}] \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. We analyze the convergence of this iteration and derive its converge rate, assuming that each $f_i$ is proper closed convex and lower bounded, $\nabla f_i$ is Lipschitz continuous with constant $L_{f_i}$, and stepsize $\alpha$ is fixed. Provided that $\alpha < O(1/L_h)$ where $L_h=\max_i\{L_{f_i}\}$, the objective error at the averaged solution, $f(\frac{1}{n}\sum_i x_{(i)}(k))-f^*$, reduces at a speed of $O(1/k)$ until it reaches $O(\alpha)$. If $f_i$ are further (restricted) strongly convex, then both $\frac{1}{n}\sum_i x_{(i)}(k)$ and each $x_{(i)}(k)$ converge to the global minimizer $x^*$ at a linear rate until reaching an $O(\alpha)$-neighborhood of $x^*$. We also develop an iteration for decentralized basis pursuit and establish its linear convergence to an $O(\alpha)$-neighborhood of the true unknown sparse signal

Confronting brane inflation with Planck and pre-Planck data

In this paper, we compare brane inflation models with the Planck data and the pre-Planck data (which combines WMAP, ACT, SPT, BAO and H0 data). The Planck data prefer a spectral index less than unity at more than 5\sigma confidence level, and a running of the spectral index at around 2\sigma confidence level. We find that the KKLMMT model can survive at the level of 2\sigma only if the parameter $\beta$ (the conformal coupling between the Hubble parameter and the inflaton) is less than $\mathcal{O}(10^{-3})$, which indicates a certain level of fine-tuning. The IR DBI model can provide a slightly larger negative running of spectral index and red tilt, but in order to be consistent with the non-Gaussianity constraints from Planck, its parameter also needs fine-tuning at some level.Comment: 10 pages, 8 figure