Neonatal anemia relates to intestinal injury in preterm infants

BACKGROUND: Anemia is associated with decreased tissue oxygenation in preterm infants and may contribute to developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We aimed to investigate whether hemoglobin level is associated with intestinal injury, by comparing anemic infants 10 days prior to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion with non-anemic controls. METHODS: A nested case-control study in which we matched anemic preterms (gestational age (GA) < 32 weeks) with non-anemic controls (1:1), based on GA, birth weight (BW), and postnatal age. We measured urinary intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, I-FABP, marker for intestinal injury, twice weekly. Simultaneously, we assessed splanchnic oxygen saturation (rsSO2) and rsSO2 variability. RESULTS: Thirty-six cases and 36 controls were included (median GA 27.6 weeks, BW 1020 grams). Median I-FABP level was higher in cases from 6 days to 24-h before transfusion (median ranging: 4749-8064 pg/ml versus 2194-3751 pg/ml). RsSO2 and rsSO2 variability were lower in cases than controls shortly before transfusion. Hemoglobin levels correlated negatively with rsSO2 and rsSO2 variability in cases, and negatively with I-FABP in cases and controls together. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary I-FABP levels were higher in anemic infants before RBC transfusion than in non-anemic matched controls, suggesting intestinal injury associated with anemia. This may predispose to NEC in some anemic preterm infants. IMPACT: Anemia is a common comorbidity in preterm infants and may lead to impaired splanchnic oxygen saturation and intestinal tissue hypoxia, a proposed mechanism for NEC. Lower hemoglobin level is associated with higher urinary I-FABP levels, a marker for intestinal injury, both in anemic preterm infants and in cases and controls together. Lower splanchnic oxygen saturation and reduction of its variability are associated with higher urinary I-FABP levels in anemic preterm infants before their first RBC transfusion. These results support the hypothesis that anemia in very preterm infants results in intestinal cell injury, which may precede NEC development in some

Statins and prevention of infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from large randomised placebo controlled trials

Objective To evaluate whether the potential of statins to lower the risk of infections as published in observational studies is causal

For which decisions is Shared Decision Making considered appropriate? – A systematic review

Objective:To identify decision characteristics for which SDM authors deem SDM appropriate or not, and what arguments are used.Methods:We applied two search strategies: we included SDM models from an earlier review (strategy 1) and conducted a new search in eight databases to include papers other than describing an SDM model, such as original research, opinion papers and reviews (strategy 2).Results:From the 92 included papers, we identified 18 decision characteristics for which authors deemed SDM appropriate, including preference-sensitive, equipoise and decisions where patient commitment is needed in implementing the decision. SDM authors indicated limits to SDM, especially when there are immediate life-saving measures needed. We identified four decision characteristics on which authors of different papers disagreed on whether or not SDM is appropriate.Conclusion:The findings of this review show the broad range of decision characteristics for which authors deem SDM appropriate, the ambiguity of some, and potential limits of SDM.Practice implications:The findings can stimulate clinicians to (re)consider pursuing SDM in situations in which they did not before. Additionally, it can inform SDM campaigns and educational programs as it shows for which decision situations SDM might be more or less challenging to practice

Microbial aetiology, outcomes, and costs of hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia; an observational analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and especially costs of hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in relation to microbial aetiology. This knowledge is indispensable to estimate cost-effectiveness of new strategies aiming to prevent and/or improve clinical outcome of CAP. METHODS: We performed our observational analysis in a cohort of 505 patients hospitalised with confirmed CAP between 2004 and 2010. Hospital administrative databases were extracted for all resource utilisation on a patient level. Resource items were grouped in seven categories: general ward nursing, nursing on ICU, clinical chemistry laboratory tests, microbiology exams, radiology exams, medication drugs, and other.linear regression analyses were conducted to identify variables predicting costs of hospitalisation for CAP. RESULTS: Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most identified causative pathogen (25%), followed by Coxiella burnetii (6%) and Haemophilus influenzae (5%). Overall median length of hospital stay was 8.5 days, in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8%. Total median hospital costs per patient were €3,899 (IQR 2,911-5,684). General ward nursing costs represented the largest share (57%), followed by nursing on the intensive care unit (16%) and diagnostic microbiological tests (9%). In multivariate regression analysis, class IV-V Pneumonia Severity Index (indicative for severe disease), Staphylococcus aureus, or Streptococcus pneumonia as causative pathogen, were independent cost driving factors. Coxiella burnetii was a cost-limiting factor. CONCLUSIONS: Median costs of hospitalisation for CAP are almost €4,000 per patient. Nursing costs are the main cause of these costs.. Apart from prevention, low-cost interventions aimed at reducing length of hospital stay therefore will most likely be cost-effective

Соціальний капітал у формуванні екстерналій освітньої сфери

У статті аналізується передавальний механізм імпульсу, який одержує економіка від зміни рівня освіти. Виходячи із припущення про прискорення (уповільнення) економічного зростання як одну із можливих екстерналій освіти, автори досліджують опосередкований вплив соціального капіталу на формування цієї екстерналії.В статье анализируется передаточный механизм импульса, полученного экономикой от изменения уровня образования. Исходя из предположения об ускорении (замедлении) экономического роста как о возможной экстерналии образования, авторы исследуют опосредованное влияние социального капитала на формирование этой экстерналии.The article under consideration analyzes the intermediary mechanism of impulse which results in economics due to education level change. In terms of assumption as regards economic growth acceleration (impairment) as one of possible education externalities the authors are researching the indirect social capital influence upon this externality formation

Patient-clinician collaboration in making care fit:A qualitative analysis of clinical consultations in diabetes care

Objective: To confirm described dimensions of making care fit and explore how patients and clinicians collaborate to make care fit in clinical practice. Methods: As part of an ongoing study, we audiotaped and transcribed patient-clinician consultations in diabetes care. We purposively selected consultations based on participants’ demographical, biomedical and biographical characteristics. We analysed transcripts using reflexive thematic analysis. We combined a deductive and inductive approach, using the pre-described dimensions of making care fit and adding new (sub-)dimensions when pertinent. Results: We analysed 24 clinical consultations. Our data confirmed eight previously described dimensions and provided new sub-dimensions of making care fit with examples from clinical practice (problematic situation, influence of devices, sense of options, shared agenda setting, clinician context, adapting to changing organization of care, and possibility to reconsider). Conclusion: Our study confirmed, specified and enriched the conceptualization of making care fit through practice examples. We observed patient-clinician collaboration in exploration of patients’ context, and by responsively changing, adapting or maintaining care plans. Practice implications: Our findings support clinicians and researchers with insights in important aspects of patient-clinician collaboration. Ultimately, this would lead to optimal design of care plans that fit well in each patient life.</p

Patient-clinician collaboration in making care fit:A qualitative analysis of clinical consultations in diabetes care

Objective: To confirm described dimensions of making care fit and explore how patients and clinicians collaborate to make care fit in clinical practice. Methods: As part of an ongoing study, we audiotaped and transcribed patient-clinician consultations in diabetes care. We purposively selected consultations based on participants’ demographical, biomedical and biographical characteristics. We analysed transcripts using reflexive thematic analysis. We combined a deductive and inductive approach, using the pre-described dimensions of making care fit and adding new (sub-)dimensions when pertinent. Results: We analysed 24 clinical consultations. Our data confirmed eight previously described dimensions and provided new sub-dimensions of making care fit with examples from clinical practice (problematic situation, influence of devices, sense of options, shared agenda setting, clinician context, adapting to changing organization of care, and possibility to reconsider). Conclusion: Our study confirmed, specified and enriched the conceptualization of making care fit through practice examples. We observed patient-clinician collaboration in exploration of patients’ context, and by responsively changing, adapting or maintaining care plans. Practice implications: Our findings support clinicians and researchers with insights in important aspects of patient-clinician collaboration. Ultimately, this would lead to optimal design of care plans that fit well in each patient life.</p

Design of a consensus-based geriatric assessment tailored for older chronic kidney disease patients:results of a pragmatic approach

PURPOSE: Unidentified cognitive decline and other geriatric impairments are prevalent in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite guideline recommendation of geriatric evaluation, routine geriatric assessment is not common in these patients. While high burden of vascular disease and existing pre-dialysis care pathways mandate a tailored geriatric assessment, no consensus exists on which instruments are most suitable in this population to identify geriatric impairments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a geriatric assessment, based on multidisciplinary consensus, to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older people with advanced CKD. METHODS: A pragmatic approach was chosen, which included focus groups, literature review, inventory of current practices, an expert consensus meeting, and pilot testing. In preparation of the consensus meeting, we composed a project team and an expert panel (n = 33), drafted selection criteria for the selection of instruments, and assessed potential instruments for the geriatric assessment. RESULTS: Selection criteria related to general geriatric domains, clinical relevance, feasibility, and duration of the assessment. The consensus-assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains. Administration of (seven) patient questionnaires and (ten) professional-administered instruments, by nurse (practitioners), takes estimated 20 and 40 min, respectively. Results are discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting including at least nephrology and geriatric expertise, informing nephrology treatment decisions, and follow-up interventions among which comprehensive geriatric assessment. CONCLUSION: This first multidisciplinary consensus on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment intent to benefit clinical care and enhance research comparability for older patients with advanced CKD

Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD:Patients’ Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences

Rationale &amp; Objective: Research on shared decision making (SDM) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) has focused almost exclusively on the modality of kidney replacement treatment. We explored what other CKD decisions are recognized by patients, what their preferences and experiences are regarding these decisions, and how decisions are made during their interactions with medical care professionals. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting &amp; Participants: Patients with CKD receiving (outpatient) care in 1 of 2 Dutch hospitals. Exposure: Patients’ preferred decisional roles for treatment decisions were measured using the Control Preferences Scale survey administered after a health care visit with medical professionals. Outcome: Number of decisions for which patients experienced a decisional role that did or did not match their preferred role. Observed levels of SDM and motivational interviewing in audio recordings of health care visits, measured using the 4-step SDM instrument (4SDM) and Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity coding tools.Analytical Approach: The results were characterized using descriptive statistics, including differences in scores between the patients’ experienced and preferred decisional roles. Results: According to the survey (n = 122) patients with CKD frequently reported decisions regarding planning (112 of 122), medication changes (82 of 122), or lifestyle changes (59 of 122). Of the 357 reported decisions in total, patients preferred that clinicians mostly (125 of 357) or fully (101 of 357) make the decisions. For 116 decisions, they preferred a shared decisional role. For 151 of 357 decisions, the patients’ preferences did not match their experiences. Decisions were experienced as “less shared/patient-directed” (76 of 357) or “more shared/patient-directed” (75 of 357) than preferred. Observed SDM in 118 coded decisions was low (median 4; range, 0 – 22). Motivational interviewing techniques were rarely used. Limitations: Potential recall and selection bias, and limited generalizability. Conclusions: We identified multiple discrepancies between preferred, experienced, and observed SDM in health care visits for CKD. Although patients varied in their preferred decisional role, a large minority of patients expressed a preference for shared decision making for many decisions. However, SDM behavior during the health care visits was observed infrequently. Plain-Language Summary: Shared decision making (SDM) may be a valuable approach for common chronic kidney disease (CKD) decisions, but our knowledge is limited. We collected patient surveys after health care visits for CKD. Patients most frequently experienced decisions regarding planning, medication, and lifestyle. Three decisional roles were preferred by comparable numbers of patients: let the clinician alone decide, let the clinician decide for the most part, or “equally share” the decision. Patients’ experiences of who made the decision did not always match their preferences. In audio recordings of the health care visits, we observed low levels of SDM behavior. These findings suggest that the preference for “sharing decisions” is often unmet for a large number of patients.</p