28 research outputs found
Detailed Atomistic Investigation of Fe-Doped Rutile Phases
We
have investigated iron-doped rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> in great detail
by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The influence of
the Fe dopants on the structural and electronic properties are calculated.
Three different dopant models are considered in this study, where
iron is present in FeÂ(II), FeÂ(III), and FeÂ(IV) oxidation states. Our
results indicate that the configuration of FeÂ(III), where two neighboring
Ti sites are replaced by Fe dopants and an O vacancy locates in between,
is the lowest-energy structure. The resulting Mößbauer
signatures are in excellent agreement with the available experimental
literature data, thus supporting the proposed structural model. Although
the crystal structure of doped rutile is not significantly altered,
even for larger concentrations of dopant atoms, the local structure
around Fe atoms can be strongly distorted, especially due to the presence
of oxygen vacancies. Fe doping lowers the band gap and introduces
midgap states
Density Functional Theory and Beyond for Band-Gap Screening: Performance for Transition-Metal Oxides and Dichalcogenides
The
performance of a wide variety of commonly used density functionals,
as well as two screened hybrid functionals (HSE06 and TB-mBJ), on
predicting electronic structures of a large class of en vogue materials,
such as metal oxides, chalcogenides, and nitrides, is discussed in
terms of band gaps, band structures, and projected electronic densities
of states. Contrary to GGA, hybrid functionals and GGA+<i>U</i>, both HSE06 and TB-mBJ are able to predict band gaps with an appreciable
accuracy of 25% and thus allow the screening of various classes of
transition-metal-based compounds, i.e., mixed or doped materials,
at modest computational cost. The calculated electronic structures
are largely unaffected by the choice of basis functions and software
implementation, however, might be subject to the treatment of the
core electrons
Hyper-Cross-Linked Organic Microporous Polymers Based on Alternating Copolymerization of Bismaleimide
A novel type of hyper-cross-linked
organic microporous polymer
(HOMP) has been successfully prepared based on the radical copolymerization
of bismaleimides and divinylbenzene. In comparison with the HOMPs
prepared with cross-linking techniques, the new radical strategy circumvents
some intractable problems, such as low atom economy, structure irregularity
and corrosive byproducts. The obtained HOMPs have defined molecular
structures due to the intrinsic alternating copolymerization properties
of the two monomers. A maximum BET surface area of 841 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>–1</sup> and high gas capture capacity (CO<sub>2</sub>, 11.22 wt %, 273 K/1.0 bar; H<sub>2</sub>, 0.82 wt %, 77.3 K/1.0
bar; benzene, 545 mg g<sup>–1</sup>, room temperature/0.6 bar;
and cyclohexane, 1736 mg g<sup>–1</sup>, room temperature/0.6
bar) were achieved. In addition, the polymers also displayed good
chemical and thermal stability, which is critical for the practical
application
Porosity-Enhanced Polymers from Hyper-Cross-Linked Polymer Precursors
Hyper-cross-linked
polymers (HCPs) have aroused great interest
because of their potential applications in adsorbing greenhouse gases
and volatile organic compounds. However, the selection of raw materials
and the postcontrol of the porosity of HCPs remain a challenge. Here,
we developed new porosity-enhanced materials by chemically creating
additional pores in polymer-based HCPs. The as-prepared material presents
a high surface area (1201 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>–1</sup>), large
microporous volume, and high chemical stability even in concentrated
acid, thus demonstrating potential in gas capture and storage (CO<sub>2</sub>: 15.31 wt % at 273 K/1.0 bar; selectivity for CO<sub>2</sub> against N<sub>2</sub>: 36.6; and large adsorption capacity for six
organic vapors). This method of creating additional pores in polymer-based
HCPs may open doors to the creation of novel porosity-enhanced materials
suitable for high-performance adsorbents
Biochar derived from corn straw affected availability and distribution of soil nutrients and cotton yield
<div><p>Biochar application as a soil amendment has been proposed as a strategy to improve soil fertility and increase crop yields. However, the effects of successive biochar applications on cotton yields and nutrient distribution in soil are not well documented. A three-year field study was conducted to investigate the effects of successive biochar applications at different rates on cotton yield and on the soil nutrient distribution in the 0–100 cm soil profile. Biochar was applied at 0, 5, 10, and 20 t ha<sup>-1</sup> (expressed as Control, BC5, BC10, and BC20, respectively) for each cotton season, with identical doses of chemical fertilizers. Biochar enhanced the cotton lint yield by 8.0–15.8%, 9.3–13.9%, and 9.2–21.9% in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively, and high levels of biochar application achieved high cotton yields each year. Leaching of soil nitrate was reduced, while the pH values, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen (N), and available K content of the 0–20 cm soil layer were increased in 2014 and 2015. However, the changes in the soil available P content were less substantial. This study suggests that successive biochar amendments have the potential to enhance cotton productivity and soil fertility while reducing nitrate leaching.</p></div
Soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>−Nin 0–100 cm soil after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014and 2015.
<p>Soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>−Nin 0–100 cm soil after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014and 2015.</p
Soil pH values after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014 and 2015.
<p>Soil pH values after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014 and 2015.</p
Soil available K contents after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (mg kg<sup>-1</sup>).
<p>Soil available K contents after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (mg kg<sup>-1</sup>).</p
Fiber quality in response to biochar application at different rates.
<p>Fiber quality in response to biochar application at different rates.</p
Soil available P contents after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (mg kg<sup>-1</sup>).
<p>Soil available P contents after cotton harvested in 2013, 2014 and 2015 (mg kg<sup>-1</sup>).</p