52 research outputs found
On the complex dynamics of intracellular ganglion cell light responses in the cat retina
We recorded intracellular responses from cat retinal ganglion cells to sinusoidal flickering lights and compared the response dynamics to a theoretical model based on coupled nonlinear oscillators. Flicker responses for several different spot sizes were separated in a 'smooth' generator (G) potential and eorresponding spike trains. We have previously shown that the G-potential reveals complex, stimulus dependent, oscillatory behavior in response to sinusoidally flickering lights. Such behavior could be simulated by a modified van der Pol oscillator. In this paper, we extend the model to account for spike generation as well, by including extended Hodgkin-Huxley equations describing local membrane properties.
We quantified spike responses by several parameters describing the mean and standard deviation of spike burst duration, timing (phase shift) of bursts, and the number of spikes in a burst. The dependence of these response parameters on stimulus frequency and spot size could be reproduced in great detail by coupling the van der Pol oscillator, and Hodgkin-Huxley equations. The model mimics many experimentally observed response patterns, including non-phase-locked irregular oscillations. Our findings suggest that the information in the ganglion cell spike train reflects both intraretinal processing, simulated by the van der Pol oscillator) and local membrane properties described by Hodgkin-Huxley equations. The interplay between these complex processes can be simulated by changing the coupling coefficients between the two oscillators. Our simulations therefore show that irregularities in spike trains, which normally are considered to be noise, may be interpreted as complex oscillations that might earry information.Whitehall Foundation (S93-24
Non-visual information in structure-from-motion
AbstractWe examined whether non-visual signals improve visual perception of three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Observers discriminated curvature in quadratic surfaces defined by random dot cinematograms with limited lifetime. They either explored visually a static surface by making head movements that were fed back to the display (HM condition) or they viewed statically the same surface which now rotated (NHM condition). Both conditions showed a clear build-up of performance as lifetime increases, but with different time constants for the HM and NHM condition. A second experiment showed that these differences could not be caused by differences in motion detection for the HM and NHM conditions. We suggest that non-visual information is combined with visual information at a high stage of visual processing, and that it does not mainly serve as input for a retinal stabilization process. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision?
The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain
Perceptual asymmetry is one of the most important characteristics of our visual
functioning. We carefully reviewed the scientific literature in order to examine
such asymmetries, separating them into two major categories: within-visual field
asymmetries and between-visual field asymmetries. We explain these asymmetries
in terms of perceptual aspects or tasks, the what of the
asymmetries; and in terms of underlying mechanisms, the why of
the asymmetries. Tthe within-visual field asymmetries are fundamental to
orientation, motion direction, and spatial frequency processing. between-visual
field asymmetries have been reported for a wide range of perceptual phenomena.
foveal dominance over the periphery, in particular, has been prominent for
visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and colour discrimination. Tthis also holds
true for object or face recognition and reading performance. upper-lower visual
field asymmetries in favour of the lower have been demonstrated for temporal and
contrast sensitivities, visual acuity, spatial resolution, orientation, hue and
motion processing. Iin contrast, the upper field advantages have been seen in
visual search, apparent size, and object recognition tasks. left-right visual
field asymmetries include the left field dominance in spatial (e.g.,
orientation) processing and the right field dominance in non-spatial (e.g.,
temporal) processing. left field is also better at low spatial frequency or
global and coordinate spatial processing, whereas the right field is better at
high spatial frequency or local and categorical spatial processing. All these
asymmetries have inborn neural/physiological origins, the primary
why, but can be also susceptible to visual experience, the
critical why (promotes or blocks the asymmetries by
altering neural functions)
Directional motion sensitivity under transparent motion conditions
We measured directional sensitivity to a foreground pattern while an orthogonally directed background pattern was present under transparent motion conditions. For both foreground and background pattern, the speed was varied between 0.5 and 28 deg see-1. A multi-step paradigm was employed which results in a better estimation of the suppressive or facilitator effects than previously applied single-step methods (e.g. measuring Din., or ll~i.). Moreover, our method gives insight into the interactions for a wide range of speeds and not just the extreme motion thresholds (the D-values). We found that high background speeds have an inhibitory effect on the detection of a range of high foreground speeds and low background speeds have an inhibitory effect on a range of low foreground speeds. Intermediate background pattern speeds inhibit the detection of both low and high foreground pattern speeds and do so in a systematic manner
Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.
We have previously reported a transparent motion after-effect indicating that the human visual system comprises separate slow and fast motion channels. Here, we report that the presentation of a fast motion in one eye and a slow motion in the other eye does not result in binocular rivalry but in a clear percept of transparent motion. We call this new visual phenomenon 'dichoptic motion transparency' (DMT). So far only the DMT phenomenon and the two motion after-effects (the 'classical' motion after-effect, seen after motion adaptation on a static test pattern, and the dynamic motion after-effect, seen on a dynamic-noise test pattern) appear to isolate the channels completely. The speed ranges of the slow and fast channels overlap strongly and are observer dependent. A model is presented that links after-effect durations of an observer to the probability of rivalry or DMT as a function of dichoptic velocity combinations. Model results support the assumption of two highly independent channels showing only within-channel rivalry, and no rivalry or after-effect interactions between the channels. The finding of two independent motion vision channels, each with a separate rivalry stage and a private line to conscious perception, might be helpful in visualizing or analysing pathways to consciousness
The perceived direction of textured gratings and their motion aftereffects.
The stimuli in these experiments are square-wave luminance gratings with an array of small random dots covering the high-luminance regions. Owing to the texture, the direction of these gratings, when seen through a circular aperture, is disambiguated because the visual system is provided with an unambiguous motion energy. Thus, the direction of textured gratings can be varied independently of grating orientation. When subjects are required to judge the direction of textured gratings moving obliquely relative to their orientation, they can do so accurately (experiment 1). This is of interest because most studies of one-dimensional motion perception have involved (textureless) luminance-defined since-wave or square-wave gratings, and the perceived direction of these gratings is constrained by the aperture problem to be orthogonal to their orientation. Thus, direction and orientation have often been confounded. Interestingly, when subjects are required to judge the direction of an obliquely moving textured grating during a period of adaptation and then the direction of the motion aftereffect (MAE) immediately following adaptation (experiments 2 and 3), these directions are not directly opposite each other. MAE directions were always more orthogonal to the orientation of the adapting grating than the corresponding direction judgments during adaptation (by as much as 25 degrees). These results are not readily explained by conventional MAE models and possible accounts are considered
The perceived direction of textured gratings and their motion aftereffects.
The stimuli in these experiments are square-wave luminance gratings with an array of small random dots covering the high-luminance regions. Owing to the texture, the direction of these gratings, when seen through a circular aperture, is disambiguated because the visual system is provided with an unambiguous motion energy. Thus, the direction of textured gratings can be varied independently of grating orientation. When subjects are required to judge the direction of textured gratings moving obliquely relative to their orientation, they can do so accurately (experiment 1). This is of interest because most studies of one-dimensional motion perception have involved (textureless) luminance-defined since-wave or square-wave gratings, and the perceived direction of these gratings is constrained by the aperture problem to be orthogonal to their orientation. Thus, direction and orientation have often been confounded. Interestingly, when subjects are required to judge the direction of an obliquely moving textured grating during a period of adaptation and then the direction of the motion aftereffect (MAE) immediately following adaptation (experiments 2 and 3), these directions are not directly opposite each other. MAE directions were always more orthogonal to the orientation of the adapting grating than the corresponding direction judgments during adaptation (by as much as 25 degrees). These results are not readily explained by conventional MAE models and possible accounts are considered
- …