10 research outputs found
Methodical approach to the estimation of possible energy production by wind and solar power plants using weather station data
The expediency of using several sources of information on climate factors for estimating the potential of wind and solar energy is substantiated. Specific features of the methodology and developed software for estimating the generation of energy by wind power plants based on weather stations open access data are considered. The possibility of taking into account the results of aerodynamic modeling of the flow of the terrain by the wind flow is realized. The methodology is implemented in the form of a computer program called Wind-MCA. It includes a module for analyzing wind power potential, a module for analyzing wind turbines, an economic analysis module, and a multi-criteria analysis module. Specific features of the methodology and developed software for estimating the generation of energy by solar power plants based on data on the transparency of the atmosphere, temperature and cloudiness are considered. The technique is implemented in the form of a computer program called Sun-MCA. The estimation of the wind energy and solar energy potential of several settlements in the central zone of the Baikal region is carried out taking into account the climate change in the region
An analysis of wind and solar power variability to assess its implications for power grid
The paper discusses the problem of parallel operation of wind and solar power plants with the power system associated with the influence of power fluctuations on the power quality and stability. A brief assessment of the prospects for the commissioning of the wind and solar power plants in Russia and a description of the associated negative impacts on the power system is given. A methodology for assessing the possible energy production of wind and solar power plants using raw data from weather stations is presented. Based on the methodology, an assessment of some regions of Russia in relation to the variability of wind speed and cloudiness is made. The wind power duration curves are given. An analysis of possible deviations of solar power under the influence of cloudiness is carried out. The effect of geographical aggregation of wind or solar power output to increase the guaranteed power generation and reduce the negative impact on the stability of the energy system is shown
Multi-criteria placement and capacity selection of solar power plants in the βBaikal-KhΓΆvsgΓΆlβ Cross-Border Recreation Area
The problem of power supply to remote consumers in the βBaikal-KhΓΆvsgΓΆlβ Cross-Border Recreation Area, associated with the high length and low reliability of power lines is discussed. The assessment of the modes of the power distribution grid showed that the introduction of new consumers in this territory will lead to unacceptable voltage deviations, even taking into account the installation of reactive power compensating devices. Since the area under consideration has a high solar energy potential, it is advisable to use distributed solar generation. The choice of locations and capacities of solar power plants is a multi-criteria optimization problem. Four criteria are proposed: total voltage deviation, total active power losses, reliability and capital costs for construction. An algorithm for multi-criteria optimizationis developed and implemented as a program in the MATLAB, which consists in sequential verification of the feasibility of installing additional power of solar power plants at the consumers of each of the substations under consideration. For each variant, the electric grid mode is assessed using the Power system analysis toolbox program. Solutions for the choice of locations and capacities of solar power plants are obtained, providing high scores by criteria in accordance with the given criteria importance coefficients
Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
The paper dwells upon the problem of multi-criteria choice of ways to develop generating capacities to supply power to remote consumers. We herein propose a two-step multi-criteria analysis method: choosing promising power-generation technology first, and then specifying the generating-capacity structure. The paper describes the structure of the proposed multi-criteria methods: the interval TOPSIS method for Step 1; for Step 2, an upgraded analytic hierarchy process based on identifying the structure of the decision makerβs preferences. We demonstrate the use of this method with evidence from the Penzhinsky District, Kamchatka Krai. Thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants, diesel power plants, as well as solar and wind power are analyzed as power sources. Step 1 includes: analyzing the potential power-supply loads in a specific area; formulating alternative power-generation technology; formulating goals and criteria; criterion-based evaluation of alternative options using objective and subjective models; multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives; analyzing the sensitivity of results and the selection of promising technology. Step 2 includes: formulating goals and criteria on the basis of the selected power-generation technologies; formulating the available alternatives; criterion-based evaluation of alternatives; multi-criteria evaluation and final decision-making
Decision Making Support for Selecting Structure of Generating Capacities at Development of Local Power Supply Systems
This paper considers the problem of multi-criteria option selection for the purpose of developing generating capacities for local power supply systems. The authors suggest a 2-stage method of multi-criteria analysis. At the 1st stage one conducts a multi-criteria selection of the most prospective power generation technology. At the 2nd stage one conducts a multi-criteria assessment of options for power station capacity ratio on the basis of the selected efficient technology of power generation. At the first stage the authors suggest a modified method of hierarchy analysis allowing for the decrease in the number of requests to a decision-maker (DM). At the second stage the authors use the modified method TOPSIS with the application of value functions for calculating non-linear change of the DM preferences in relation to the assessment of options by the criteria
Choice of fuel for heat power plants in areas of new development taking into account the uncertainty factor
ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ², Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π³Π΄Π΅ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ². Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ: ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ². Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ³Π»Ρ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΠΌΡΡΠΊΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠΎ-ΠΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
ΠΠ°Π³Π°Π΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ² ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ: ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°, ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ± ΠΎΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠ° Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΆΠΈΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°, ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈ, Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΆΠΈΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π° Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.The relevance of the research is caused by the transformation of the methodology for substantiating the development of energy from centralized state planning to a new paradigm for multilateral decision-making and the creation of mechanisms for their implementation in terms of multi-criteria, multiplicity of conflicting interests, uncertainty of initial information and conditions for further development. New conditions for substantiating the decisions are considered in the context of the construction of thermal power plants in remote areas of new development, where local energy resources are considered as fuel. The choice of fuel determines the economic and technical indicators of power plants, their environmental and social impacts. In order to justify the choice of fuel for thermal power plants from the point of view of numerous criteria in the conditions of uncertainty of initial information and future development conditions, it is necessary to create new methodological approaches. The main aim of the research is to propose a methodology of multi-criteria fuel selection for a thermal power plant in the areas of new development taking into account the uncertainty factor. Objects: organic fuel deposits in remote areas of new development. Methods: multiplicative method of the analytic hierarchy process, method of multi-criteria utility theory, methods of interval analysis, methods of fuzzy set theory. Results. The author has carried out the review of modern methodological approaches in the problems of substantiation of the choice of fuel for power plants and proposed the modification of the method of the analytic hierarchy process. It allows taking into account the uncertainty of the source information and the ambiguity of preferences of decision makers, as well as significantly reducing the number of requests for information. On the basis of the modified method, the author developed the technique of multi-criteria selection of fuel for thermal power plants in the areas of new development. Its application is considered on the problem of coal selection in three points of perspective siting of thermal power plant in Omsukchansky and Severo-Evensky districts of Magadan region. The criteria used to compare the alternatives are: fuel cost, pollutant emissions from fuel combustion, fuel reserves, development and production conditions, the impact of fuel combustion emissions on the health of the population, employment of the local population
Siting and sizing of wind farms taking into account stochastic nature of generation
The article deals with the problem of the negative impact of wind farms stochastic generation on power grid. One of the ways to reduce the stochasticity of the wind farms generation is their geographically distributed siting. A technique for sizing and distributed siting of wind farms from the standpoint of the influence on the variability of the total generated power is proposed. Modeling of wind power generation with hourly detailing is carried out using the developed Wind-MCA software based on data from archives of long-term observations of ground-based weather stations. The optimal distribution of wind turbines in potential locations is based on a genetic algorithm. The objective function is the coefficient of variation of the power generated by all wind farms in the sites under consideration, depending on the number of wind turbines in their composition. The genetic algorithm is implemented using the built-in MATLAB function. The proposed technique is applied to assess the capacity options and sites for wind farms in the Zabaykalsky Krai. The solution providing the minimum value of the coefficient of variation of the wind farms generated power and high value of the wind farms capacity utilization factor has been obtained
Flow Profile Estimating in production wells based on chemical composition of fluids (an example on Volga-Ural Petroleum and Gas Province)
Current problems in mature oil fields are high water cut and flow profile estimating of oil and associated brines from different layers. To establish the flow profile in production wells, geophysical research (Production Logging) is traditionally used by lowering special equipment into the well. Production Logging requires production stops and labor costs. Geochemical methods (Production Geochemistry) are used as an alternative solution: sampling is simple and efficient, which makes it possible to cover all the interesting area. Moreover, sampling does not require stopping the well. The geochemical method uses individual indicators of the composition of formation fluids produced from different perforation intervals. In this work, geochemical studies were carried out using wellhead samples from more than 100 wells, with single perforation for carbonate and terrigenous reservoirs. Some wells have joint exploitation of these formations. An automated algorithm was used to identify the distinctive characteristics of each formation based on the composition of the produced brines and oils. Data on the chemical composition of fluids from different development objects made it possible to determine the flow profiles in wells with joint production. Based on the results of the studies, the Devonian reservoir of the field under consideration is divided into 2 parts β northern and southern, which differ in the chemical composition of formation fluids. The same separation of the deposits into 2 parts is noted by field development analysis: over the past 50 years, the main production of oil and associated brines has been concentrated in the southern part of the deposit, confined to the fault, where the active work of the aquifer is assumed. It is recommended to use the obtained data for history matching of the reservoir simulation model
Potential for improving the efficiency of carbonate oil deposits waterflooding with the use of controlled salinity technology (Smart water) at fields of Tatarstan Republic
The article provides an overview of ion-modified waterflooding technology, also known as low salinity, controlled salinity, or Smart water. This technology is currently considered one of the most promising approaches in the development of oil deposits in carbonate reservoirs due to its economic efficiency and environmental safety.
The article discusses the main mechanisms and processes underlying ion-modified waterflooding and presents the results of laboratory studies conducted on core samples from foreign oil deposits. It includes an analysis of several studies, including contact angle measurements and core flooding experiments on core samples from oil deposits in carbonate reservoirs on the eastern side of the Melekess depression in the Republic of Tatarstan.
It is important to note that the Vereyian deposits explored in this article are not a typical example of test objects for ion-modified water injection. This is because they are characterized by a low reservoir temperature of 23 Β°C, which suggests that the efficiency of the technology would likely be lower compared to studies conducted abroad, where reservoir temperatures were significantly higher. For example, Darvish Sarvestani et al. studied reservoir conditions at 90 Β°C, Yousef et al. β reservoir temperature of 100 Β°C, and Austad et al. examined the Ekofisk field at 130 Β°C and the Volhall field at 90 Β°C in Norway.
However, as several studies have indicated, prolonged contact between rock samples and ion-modified water contributes to significant hydrophilization of the rock surface, as confirmed by contact angle measurements. The contact angle decreases from approximately 138.3Β° to 53.45Β° after exposure to ion-modified water.
Additionally, the core flooding experiment demonstrated a slight increase in the oil displacement coefficient, reaching 9.2%.
These findings suggest the potential for enhanced oil recovery by injecting Smart water into the Vereyian sediments, although further research is required to confirm the underlying mechanism
Technical and economic model of an autonomous complex for production of Β«greenΒ» hydrogen and its testing on the example of Mongolia and Japan
ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Ρ ΡΠΆΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Ρ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ½Π°Π±ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Β«Π·Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» ΡΠΆΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ
, ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Ρ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΠ³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΆΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ² Π² ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΠΠ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ; ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΊΡ Π΅Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Β«Π·Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» ΡΠΆΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΠΎΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π―ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ: Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Ρ Β«Π·Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΆΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ - 10 ΡΡΡ. Ρ/Π³ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠΆΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Β«Π·Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π΄Π»Ρ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΠΎΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΈ (Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ·. Π₯ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³ΡΠ») ΠΈ Π―ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΈ (ΠΏΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π―ΠΌΠ°Π³Π°ΡΠ°), ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ 10,8 ΠΈ 13,4 10,8 per kg and $13,4 per kg, respectively