7 research outputs found
Operational Hedging of Exchange Rate Risks
Exchange rate exposure of firms diminishes when imported intermediates
and exports are denominated in currencies that move together. Appreciations
of the domestic currency, raising foreign currency export prices,
then also reduce marginal costs, allowing firms to counter the increase
in foreign prices. Using firm-level data from seven European countries
I estimate a structural model showing how exchange rate pass-through
into sales depends on intermediate imports and the co-movement of export
and import related exchange rates. I find that operational hedging
requires firms to intentionally choose export and import regions with comoving
currencies. Analyzing the locational choice of firms confirms that
the co-movement of currencies indeed appears to be taken into consideratio
Operational Hedging of Exchange Rate Risks
Exchange rate exposure of firms diminishes when imported intermediates
and exports are denominated in currencies that move together. Appreciations
of the domestic currency, raising foreign currency export prices,
then also reduce marginal costs, allowing firms to counter the increase
in foreign prices. Using firm-level data from seven European countries
I estimate a structural model showing how exchange rate pass-through
into sales depends on intermediate imports and the co-movement of export
and import related exchange rates. I find that operational hedging
requires firms to intentionally choose export and import regions with comoving
currencies. Analyzing the locational choice of firms confirms that
the co-movement of currencies indeed appears to be taken into consideratio
Europe's exports superstar - it's the organisation! Bruegel Working Paper 2015/05, 15 July 2015
What explains Germany’s superb export performance? Is Germany’s export behaviour very distinct compared to other European countries? The authors explore the organisational responses to competition of 14,000 exporting firms in seven European countries. The paper examines the export business model of the median exporter and of the top one percent exporters in each country, accounting for 20 percent to 55 percent of total exports.
What do these firms do to become superstars? The authors find, first, that the export market share of the median exporter in each of the countries to the world more than tripled (in some cases the export market share increases tenfold) for firms that combine decentralised management with offshoring of production to low-wage countries. Exporters which abstain from any organisational adjustment do very badly. Decentralised management provides incentives for workers for product improvements allowing exporters to compete on quality. Offshoring production to low-wage countries reduces costs allowing exporters to compete on price. Second, we find that Germany is the leading quality exporter in Europe followed by Austria and Spain. Among the top 10 percent of exporters there is no single firm with low quality in Germany and Austria, which suggest that decentralised management has provided incentives for quality in these countries. Third, Germany’s exports are less vulnerable to price increases, while exports from France and Italy respond strongly to price changes, and thus costs reductions via offshoring benefits these countries most
Europe's exports superstar: It's the organisation!
What explains Germany's superb export performance? Is Germany's export behaviour very distinct compared to other European countries? We explore the organisational responses to competition of 14,000 exporting firms in seven European countries. We examine the export business model of the median exporter and of the top one percent exporters in each country, accounting for 20 percent to 55 percent of total exports. What do these firms do to become superstars? We find, first, that the export market share of the median exporter in each of the countries to the world more than tripled (in some cases the export market share increases tenfold) for firms that combine decentralised management with offshoring of production to low-wage countries. Exporters which abstain from any organisational adjustment do very badly. Decentralised management provides incentives for workers for product improvements allowing exporters to compete on quality. Offshoring production to low-wage countries reduces costs allowing exporters to compete on price. Second, we find that Germany is the leading quality exporter in Europe followed by Austria and Spain. Among the top 10 percent of exporters there is no single firm with low quality in Germany and Austria, which suggest that decentralised management has provided incentives for quality in these countries. Third, Germany's exports are less vulnerable to price increases, while exports from France and Italy respond strongly to price changes, and thus costs reductions via offshoring benefits these countries most
Import Competition and the Composition of Firm Investments
We study how foreign competition affects the composition of investments inside firms. A parsimonious model predicts that firms have an incentive to shift their investments towards more short-term assets when exposed to tougher competition. Using data on expenditures of listed US companies into various asset classes with different lifespans, we document empirical evidence that is consistent with this prediction. Over a fifteen year period between 1995 and 2009, the rise in import competition is associated with a reduction of the firm-specific asset lifespan by about 4.5% on average. We additionally exploit the Chinese WTO accession as an exogenous shock in firm expectations about future exposure to competition
Import Competition and the Composition of Firm Investments
We study how foreign competition affects the composition of investments inside firms. A parsimonious model predicts that firms have an incentive to shift their investments towards more short-term assets when exposed to tougher competition. Using data on expenditures of listed US companies into various asset classes with different lifespans, we document empirical evidence that is consistent with this prediction. Over a fifteen year period between 1995 and 2009, the rise in import competition is associated with a reduction of the firm-specific asset lifespan by about 4.5% on average. We additionally exploit the Chinese WTO accession as an exogenous shock in firm expectations about future exposure to competition