Public health and the economy could be served by reallocating medical expenditures to social programs.

As much as 30% of US health care spending in the United States does not improve individual or population health. To a large extent this excess spending results from prices that are too high and from administrative waste. In the public sector, and particularly at the state level, where budget constraints are severe and reluctance to raise taxes high, this spending crowds out social, educational, and public-health investments. Over time, as spending on medical care increases, spending on improvements to the social determinants of health are starved. In California the fraction of General Fund expenditures spent on public health and social programs fell from 34.8% in fiscal year 1990 to 21.4% in fiscal year 2014, while health care increased from 14.1% to 21.3%. In spending more on healthcare and less on other efforts to improve health and health determinants, the state is missing important opportunities for health-promoting interventions with a strong financial return. Reallocating ineffective medical expenditures to proven and cost-effective public health and social programs would not be easy, but recognizing its potential for improving the public's health while saving taxpayers billions of dollars might provide political cover to those willing to engage in genuine reform. National estimates of the percent of medical spending that does not improve health suggest that approximately $5 billion of California's public budget for medical spending has no positive effect on health. Up to 10,500 premature deaths could be prevented annually by reallocating this portion of medical spending to public health. Alternatively, the same expenditure could help an additional 418,000 high school students to graduate

Who Gets Needed Mental Health Care? Use of Mental Health Services among Adults with Mental Health Need in California

Background and Purpose. Timely and appropriate treatment could help reduce the burden of mental illness. This study describes mental health services use among Californians with mental health need, highlights underserved populations, and discusses policy opportunities. Methods. Four years of California Health Interview Survey data (2011, 2012, 2013, 2014) were pooled and weighted to the 2013 population to estimate mental health need and unmet need (n=82,706). Adults with mental health need had “unmet need” if they did not use prescription medication and did not have at least four or more mental health visits in the past year. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the probability adults with mental health need did not receive past-year treatment (n=5,315). Results. Seventy-seven percent of Californians with mental health need received no or inadequate mental health treatment in 2013. Men, Latinos, Asians, young people, older adults, people with less education, uninsured adults, and individuals with limited English proficiency were significantly more likely to have unmet need. Cost of treatment and mental health stigma were common reasons for lack of care. Conclusion. Unmet mental health need is predominant in California. Policy recommendations include continued expansion of mental health coverage, early identification, and ensuring that treatment is culturally and linguistically appropriate

Identification of recruitment and retention strategies for rehabilitation professionals in Ontario, Canada: results from expert panels

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demand for rehabilitation services is expected to increase due to factors such as an aging population, workforce pressures, rise in chronic and complex multi-system disorders, advances in technology, and changes in interprofessional health service delivery models. However, health human resource (HHR) strategies for Canadian rehabilitation professionals are lagging behind other professional groups such as physicians and nurses. The objectives of this study were: 1) to identify recruitment and retention strategies of rehabilitation professionals including occupational therapists, physical therapists and speech language pathologists from the literature; and 2) to investigate both the importance and feasibility of the identified strategies using expert panels amongst HHR and education experts.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A review of the literature was conducted to identify recruitment and retention strategies for rehabilitation professionals. Two expert panels, one on <it>Recruitment and Retention </it>and the other on <it>Education </it>were convened to determine the importance and feasibility of the identified strategies. A modified-delphi process was used to gain consensus and to rate the identified strategies along these two dimensions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 34 strategies were identified by the <it>Recruitment and Retention </it>and <it>Education </it>expert panels as being important and feasible for the development of a HHR plan for recruitment and retention of rehabilitation professionals. Seven were categorized under the <it>Quality of Worklife and Work Environment </it>theme, another seven in <it>Financial Incentives and Marketing</it>, two in <it>Workload and Skill Mix</it>, thirteen in <it>Professional Development </it>and five in <it>Education and Training</it>.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Based on the results from the expert panels, the three major areas of focus for HHR planning in the rehabilitation sector should include strategies addressing <it>Quality of Worklife and Work Environment</it>, <it>Financial Incentives and Marketing </it>and <it>Professional Development</it>.</p

Impact of Gentrification on Adult Mental Health

Gentrification is a dynamic process that changes the physical, economic, social, and cultural characteristics of historically underserved neighborhoods. This neighborhood transition process can improve the material and environmental circumstances of some residents and bring forth harmful consequences such as heightened financial stress and residential displacement for other community members. The subsequent impact of gentrification on population health is understudied, and little is known about how gentrification influences the mental wellness of residents.This dissertation advances the small but growing literature on the relationship between gentrification and adult mental health. Using multiple data sources, we identified Southern California neighborhoods that gentrified between 2010 and 2015 and investigated the impact of living in a gentrified neighborhood on mental health distress. Econometric techniques such as instrumental variables estimation and propensity score analyses were applied to reduce bias arising from residential selection and reverse causality.The first study compared three quantitative approaches for identifying gentrified neighborhoods and demonstrated that each approach generated a different set of results. Findings highlighted the importance of the strategy used for identifying gentrified neighborhoods, especially when assessing gentrification’s effects on health outcomes. The second study used five years of pooled data from the California Health Interview Survey to examine the causal relationship between gentrification and adult mental health. Relative to living in a low-income and not gentrified neighborhood, living in a gentrified neighborhood was associated with increased likelihood of serious psychological distress among longtime residents, renters, and people with low incomes. In the third study, we evaluated reasons for moving between residents who moved within gentrified and not gentrified neighborhoods and found evidence that people in gentrified neighborhoods were more likely to experience within-neighborhood displacement. Residents who experienced within-neighborhood displacement had greater likelihoods of having serious psychological distress.Taken together, findings suggest that gentrification imposes a mental health cost on longtime residents and the most financially vulnerable residents, which has important implications for population health. By elevating levels of mental health distress of population groups who are already disproportionately exposed to stressors, gentrification can exacerbate mental health inequities

Impact of Gentrification on Adult Mental Health

Gentrification is a dynamic process that changes the physical, economic, social, and cultural characteristics of historically underserved neighborhoods. This neighborhood transition process can improve the material and environmental circumstances of some residents and bring forth harmful consequences such as heightened financial stress and residential displacement for other community members. The subsequent impact of gentrification on population health is understudied, and little is known about how gentrification influences the mental wellness of residents.This dissertation advances the small but growing literature on the relationship between gentrification and adult mental health. Using multiple data sources, we identified Southern California neighborhoods that gentrified between 2010 and 2015 and investigated the impact of living in a gentrified neighborhood on mental health distress. Econometric techniques such as instrumental variables estimation and propensity score analyses were applied to reduce bias arising from residential selection and reverse causality.The first study compared three quantitative approaches for identifying gentrified neighborhoods and demonstrated that each approach generated a different set of results. Findings highlighted the importance of the strategy used for identifying gentrified neighborhoods, especially when assessing gentrification’s effects on health outcomes. The second study used five years of pooled data from the California Health Interview Survey to examine the causal relationship between gentrification and adult mental health. Relative to living in a low-income and not gentrified neighborhood, living in a gentrified neighborhood was associated with increased likelihood of serious psychological distress among longtime residents, renters, and people with low incomes. In the third study, we evaluated reasons for moving between residents who moved within gentrified and not gentrified neighborhoods and found evidence that people in gentrified neighborhoods were more likely to experience within-neighborhood displacement. Residents who experienced within-neighborhood displacement had greater likelihoods of having serious psychological distress.Taken together, findings suggest that gentrification imposes a mental health cost on longtime residents and the most financially vulnerable residents, which has important implications for population health. By elevating levels of mental health distress of population groups who are already disproportionately exposed to stressors, gentrification can exacerbate mental health inequities

REVERSE LOGISTICS IMPLEMENTATION FOR E-WASTE MANAGEMENT: INSIGHTS FROM THE ELECTRONIC PRODUCERS IN SINGAPORE

Master'sMASTER OF SCIENCE (ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT) (MEM

The State of Asian American Businesses

Business success is a dominant theme in the Asian American narrative. However, Asian American entrepreneurship is more complex and multilayered than commonly believed and requires careful scrutiny. This brief examines the state of Asian American business ownership between 2005 and 2007. Findings suggest that although Asian Americans form businesses at higher rates than other racial/ethnic minorities, Asian American business ownership and outcomes continue to trail those of non-Hispanic whites. Potential factors contributing to racial/ethnic gaps and policy recommendations are discussed

Public health and the economy could be served by reallocating medical expenditures to social programs

As much as 30% of US health care spending in the United States does not improve individual or population health. To a large extent this excess spending results from prices that are too high and from administrative waste. In the public sector, and particularly at the state level, where budget constraints are severe and reluctance to raise taxes high, this spending crowds out social, educational, and public-health investments. Over time, as spending on medical care increases, spending on improvements to the social determinants of health are starved. In California the fraction of General Fund expenditures spent on public health and social programs fell from 34.8% in fiscal year 1990 to 21.4% in fiscal year 2014, while health care increased from 14.1% to 21.3%. In spending more on healthcare and less on other efforts to improve health and health determinants, the state is missing important opportunities for health-promoting interventions with a strong financial return. Reallocating ineffective medical expenditures to proven and cost-effective public health and social programs would not be easy, but recognizing its potential for improving the public's health while saving taxpayers billions of dollars might provide political cover to those willing to engage in genuine reform. National estimates of the percent of medical spending that does not improve health suggest that approximately $5 billion of California's public budget for medical spending has no positive effect on health. Up to 10,500 premature deaths could be prevented annually by reallocating this portion of medical spending to public health. Alternatively, the same expenditure could help an additional 418,000 high school students to graduate

Risks and Rewards in Wealth Building: Asian American Homeownership and Foreclosure Pre and Post Housing Boom in East San Gabriel Valley, California

While much research exists on African Americans and Latinos after the housing crisis in 2007, much less is known about the Asian American experience particularly as it relates to foreclosure and housing burden. This study takes a quantitative case study approach examining Asian Americans in one region of Los Angeles County. Utilizing data from the Census, Home Mortgage Foreclosure Data, and Data-Quick, we provide a more comprehensive picture of the Asian American housing experience before, during and after the housing boom in 2005. Findings show that Asian Americans’ decline in homeownership could not be explained by foreclosure. In fact, Asian Americans may have avoided foreclosure in this region using higher down payments, avoiding subprime loans, and loans with variable interest. A potential cost of these actions is higher housing burden, which is closely related to default and foreclosure. Thus, policymakers and community leaders should continue to monitor Asian American homeownership as the impact of the housing collapse may be delayed for Asian Americans compared to other racial groups