9 research outputs found

    Effects of hydrogen peroxide on relaxation through the NO/sGC/cGMP pathway in isolated rat iliac arteries

    No full text
    <div><p></p><p>The production of reactive oxygen species, including hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), is increased in diseased blood vessels. Although H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> leads to impairment of the nitric oxide (NO)/soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)/cGMP signaling pathway, it is not clear whether this reactive molecule affects the redox state of sGC, a key determinant of NO bioavailability. To clarify this issue, mechanical responses of endothelium-denuded rat external iliac arteries to BAY 41-2272 (sGC stimulator), BAY 60-2770 (sGC activator), nitroglycerin (NO donor), acidified NaNO<sub>2</sub> (exogenous NO) and 8-Br-cGMP (cGMP analog) were studied under exposure to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. The relaxant response to BAY 41-2272 (<i>pD</i><sub>2</sub>: 6.79 ± 0.10 and 6.62 ± 0.17), BAY 60-2770 (<i>pD</i><sub>2</sub>: 9.57 ± 0.06 and 9.34 ± 0.15) or 8-Br-cGMP (<i>pD</i><sub>2</sub>: 5.19 ± 0.06 and 5.24 ± 0.08) was not apparently affected by exposure to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. In addition, vascular cGMP production stimulated with BAY 41-2272 or BAY 60-2770 in the presence of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was identical to that in its absence. On the other hand, nitroglycerin-induced relaxation was markedly attenuated by exposing the arteries to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (<i>pD</i><sub>2</sub>: 8.73 ± 0.05 and 8.30 ± 0.05), which was normalized in the presence of catalase (<i>pD</i><sub>2</sub>: 8.59 ± 0.05). Likewise, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> exposure impaired the relaxant response to acidified NaNO<sub>2</sub> (<i>pD</i><sub>2</sub>: 6.52 ± 0.17 and 6.09 ± 0.16). These findings suggest that H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> interferes with the NO-mediated action, but the sGC redox equilibrium and the downstream target(s) of cGMP are unlikely to be affected in the vasculature.</p></div

    Antioxidant effects of DHA in HUVECs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) HUVECs were pretreated with DHA for 16 h, and then stimulated with tBHP (250 or 500 µM) for 6 h. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Values are expressed as percentage of cell survival, and each represents the mean ± SE of 4 experiments. (B, C) HUVECs were incubated with DHA (75 µM) for 16 h. GSH concentration (B) and ratio of GSH/GSSG (C) were determined. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 7 experiments. (D) HUVECs were pretreated with DHA (75 µM) for 16 h, and exposed to tBHP (250 or 500 µM). ROS released from cells was determined at different time intervals over 2-h period. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 8 experiments. ***<i>P</i><0.001, compared with tBHP-treated BSA control, <b><sup>†††</sup></b><i>P</i><0.001, compared with tBHP-untreated BSA control.</p

    Effects of HO-1 inhibition and Nrf2 knockdown on antioxidant effects of DHA or 4-HHE.

    No full text
    <p>(A) HUVECs were pretreated in the presence of DHA (75 µM) with or without ZnPP (5 µM) for 16 h, and stimulated with tBHP (250 µM) for 24 h. LDH in the supernatant of culture media was quantitatively analyzed. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 6 experiments. (B–D) HUVECs were transfected with Nrf2 siRNA and control siRNA, respectively. 32-h later, they were incubated with DHA (75 µM) or 4-HHE (5 or 10 µM) for additional 16 h, and then exposed to tBHP (250 or 500 µM). (B, C) Cell viability 6-h after tBHP treatment was measured by MTT assay. Values are expressed as percentage of cell survival, and each represents the mean ± SE of 3–4 experiments. (D) tBHP (500 µM)-induced ROS release was measured at different time intervals over 2-h period. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 4 experiments. **<i>P</i><0.01, ***<i>P</i><0.001, compared with tBHP-treated corresponding control, <b><sup>†††</sup></b><i>P</i><0.001, compared with tBHP-untreated BSA control.</p

    Effects of fish-oil diet on HO-1 expression and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in thoracic aortas.

    No full text
    <p>Control or fish-oil diet was fed to C57BL/6 or Nrf2<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice for 3 weeks. (A) The relative mRNA expressions of HO-1 in thoracic aortas were analyzed quantitatively using real-time RT-PCR. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 6–10 animals. (B) Total cell lysates from thoracic aortas were subjected to western blotting analyses. Each value represents the mean ± SE of four animals. (C–F) Concentration-vasodilatory response curves induced by ACh (C, D) or SNP (E, F) in aortic rings obtained from C57BL/6 (C, E) or Nrf2<i><sup>−/−</sup></i> mice (D, F) fed with fish-oil diet for 3 weeks. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 12–18 rings. *<i>P</i><0.05, **<i>P</i><0.01, compared with control diet-fed C57BL/6 mice. <b><sup>††</sup></b><i>P</i><0.01, compared with fish-oil diet-fed C57BL/6 mice.</p

    Effects of fish-oil diet on concentrations of 4-HHE, 4-HNE, DHA and EPA in thoracic aortas.

    No full text
    <p>Control or fish-oil diet was fed to C57BL/6 mice for 3 weeks. The concentrations of intra-aortic 4-HHE or 4-HNE (A), and DHA or EPA (B) were measured by LC-MS/MS analyses. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 4 animals. *<i>P</i><0.05, ***<i>P</i><0.001, compared with each corresponding control.</p

    Effects of PPARα siRNA, COX inhibitors or antioxidants on DHA- or 4-HHE-induced HO-1 mRNA expression.

    No full text
    <p>(A) HUVECs were treated with PPARα siRNA or control siRNA, and incubated for 48 h. The relative mRNA expression of PPARα was quantitated using real-time RT-PCR. Each value represents the mean ± SE of three experiments. (B) HUVECs were transfected with siRNA targeted against PPARα or control siRNA. After 48 h, the cells were incubated with DHA (25 µM) for a further 6 h. The relative mRNA expression was analyzed quantitatively using real-time RT-PCR. Each value represents the mean ± SE of three experiments. (C–F) HUVECs were pretreated in the presence of indomethacin (10 µM), NS-398 (1 µM), SC-58125 (1 µM), BHT (100 µM), α-tocopherol (100 µM) or NAC (5 mM) for 1 h, and stimulated with DHA (25 µM) or 4-HHE (5 µM) for 6 h. The relative mRNA expression was quantitated using real-time RT-PCR. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 3–5 experiments. **<i>P</i><0.01, compared with the control cells treated with control siRNA, <b><sup>††</sup></b><i>P</i><0.01, <b><sup>†††</sup></b><i>P</i><0.001, compared with NAC-untreated corresponding cells.</p
    corecore