Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase 1 Inhibitor Brensocatib for Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Brensocatib is an investigational, first-in-class, selective, and reversible dipeptidyl peptidase 1 inhibitor that blocks activation of neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs). The NSPs neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase 3 are believed to be central to the pathogenesis of several chronic inflammatory diseases, including bronchiectasis. In a phase II study, oral brensocatib 10 mg and 25 mg reduced sputum neutrophil elastase activity and prolonged the time to pulmonary exacerbation in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE). A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was developed to characterize brensocatib exposure, determine potential relationships between brensocatib exposure and efficacy and safety measures, and inform dose selection in clinical studies. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data pooled from a phase I study of once-daily brensocatib (10, 25, and 40 mg) in healthy adults and a phase II study of once-daily brensocatib (10 mg and 25 mg) in adults with NCFBE were used to develop a PPK model and to evaluate potential covariate effects on brensocatib pharmacokinetics. PK–efficacy relationships for sputum neutrophil elastase below the level of quantification (BLQ) and reduction in pulmonary exacerbation and PK–safety relationships for adverse events of special interest (AESIs; periodontal disease, hyperkeratosis, and infections other than pulmonary infections) were evaluated based on model-predicted brensocatib exposure. A total of 1284 steady-state brensocatib concentrations from 225 individuals were included in the PPK data set; 241 patients with NCFBE from the phase II study were included in the pharmacodynamic (PD) population for the PK/PD analyses. RESULTS: The PPK model that best described the observed data consisted of two distributional compartments and linear clearance. Two significant covariates were found: age on volume of distribution and renal function on apparent oral clearance. PK–efficacy analysis revealed a threshold brensocatib exposure (area under the concentration–time curve) effect for attaining sputum neutrophil elastase BLQ and a strong relationship between sputum neutrophil elastase BLQ and reduction in pulmonary exacerbations. A PK–safety evaluation showed no noticeable trends between brensocatib exposure and the incidence of AESIs. Based on the predicted likelihood of clinical outcomes for sputum neutrophil elastase BLQ and pulmonary exacerbations, brensocatib doses of 10 mg and 25 mg once daily were selected for a phase III clinical trial in patients with NCFBE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04594369). CONCLUSIONS: PPK results revealed that age and renal function have a moderate effect on brensocatib exposure. However, this finding does not warrant dose adjustments based on age or in those with mild or moderate renal impairment. The PK/PD evaluation demonstrated the clinically meaningful relationship between suppression of neutrophil elastase activity and reduction in exacerbations in brensocatib-treated patients with NCFBE, supporting further development of brensocatib for bronchiectasis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-022-01147-w

Effect of exacerbation history on clinical response to dupilumab in moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma

Background The phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02414854) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab 200 and 300 mg every 2 weeks versus placebo. This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of dupilumab on efficacy outcomes and asthma control across a range of historical exacerbation rates in patients with type 2-high asthma. Methods Annualised severe exacerbation rates over the 52-week treatment period, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at weeks 12 and 52, and the five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score at weeks 24 and 52 were assessed in patients with ≥1, ≥2 or ≥3 exacerbations in the previous year. Subgroups were stratified by baseline blood eosinophils ≥150 or ≥300 cells·μL-1 or baseline exhaled nitric oxide fraction ≥25 ppb and baseline inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose. Results Across all type 2-high subgroups, dupilumab versus placebo significantly reduced severe exacerbations by 54–90%, with greater improvements in patients with more exacerbations prior to study initiation. Similarly, improvements in FEV1 (least squares (LS) mean difference versus placebo: ≥1 exacerbations, 0.15–0.25 L; ≥2 exacerbations, 0.12–0.32 L; ≥3 exacerbations, 0.09–0.38 L; majority p<0.05) and ACQ-5 score (LS mean difference range: ≥1 exacerbations, -0.30 to -0.57; ≥2 exacerbations, -0.29 to -0.56; ≥3 exacerbations, -0.43 to -0.61; all p<0.05) were observed, irrespective of prior exacerbation history, across all subgroups. Conclusions Dupilumab significantly reduced severe exacerbations and improved FEV1 and asthma control in patients with elevated type 2 biomarkers irrespective of exacerbation history and baseline ICS dose

Dupilumab improves symptoms, quality of life, and productivity in uncontrolled persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: In a pivotal, phase 2b study (NCT01854047) in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma, despite using medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2 agonists, dupilumab improved lung function, reduced severe exacerbations, and showed an acceptable safety profile. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of dupilumab on asthma control, symptoms, quality of life (QoL), and productivity. METHODS: Data are shown for the intention-to-treat population receiving dupilumab 200/300 mg every 2 weeks (doses being assessed in phase 3; NCT02414854), or placebo. Predefined analyses of total scores were conducted at week 24 for the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5), patient-reported morning/evening (AM/PM) asthma symptoms, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and asthma-related productivity loss. Responder rate analyses for these measures, subgroup analyses by baseline characteristics, and asthma-related productivity loss analyses were conducted post hoc. RESULTS: Data from 465 patients were analyzed (158 placebo; 307 dupilumab). Both dupilumab doses significantly improved scores through week 24 (all outcomes, overall population). The proportion of patients meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the overall population were significantly greater vs placebo (P \u3c .05) for ACQ-5 (range, 72.6%-76.7% vs 61.4%), for AM/PM asthma symptoms score (48.7%-54.1% vs 34.2% and 52.7%-53.5% vs 34.2%, respectively) and for AQLQ (64.0%-65.0% vs 51.3%). The effect of dupilumab was consistent across most subgroups. Productivity loss was significantly higher in placebo- vs dupilumab-treated patients (P \u3c .0001). CONCLUSION: Dupilumab produced significant, clinically meaningful improvements in asthma control, symptoms, QoL, and productivity. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01854047

Dupilumab improves lung function in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma

Background: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key drivers of type 2 inflammation. In the phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST trial (NCT02414854) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma, add-on dupilumab 200 mg or 300 mg every 2 weeks reduced exacerbations and improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and quality of life over 52 weeks. This analysis evaluates dupilimab's effect on lung function in the overall population, and subgroups with baseline elevated type 2 inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: Patients were randomised to 52 weeks of subcutaneous dupilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks, 300 mg every 2 weeks, or matched-volume placebos. Lung function outcomes were analysed in the overall population, in patients with ≥150 eosinophils·µL−1, ≥300 eosinophils·µL−1, ≥25 ppb fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and both ≥150 eosinophils·µL−1 and ≥25 ppb FeNO, at baseline. Results: Dupilumab treatment (200 mg and 300 mg every 2 weeks) resulted in significant improvements versus placebo after 52 weeks in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (0.20 and 0.13 L, respectively, versus placebo) and post-bronchodilator FEV1 (0.19 and 0.13 L, respectively), forced vital capacity (FVC) (0.20 and 0.14 L, respectively), forced expiratory flow (0.19 and 0.13 L·s−1, respectively) and pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio (1.75% and 1.61%, respectively) in the overall population (p<0.001). Difference versus placebo in post-bronchodilator FEV1 slope of change (weeks 4–52) was significant (0.04 L·year−1; p<0.05). Greater improvements were achieved in patients with elevated baseline blood eosinophil and/or FeNO levels for most outcomes. Conclusions: Dupilumab improves lung function outcomes, including large and small airway measurements and fixed airway obstruction, in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma; particularly in patients with elevated biomarkers of type 2 inflammation

Delayed Recognition of an Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in a Young Adult Female

A percentage of ureteropelvic junction obstruction cases are clinically silent in childhood and manifest symptoms in adults. Herein we present a 25-year-old female with several years of intermittent flank pain and abdominal symptoms with prior inconclusive diagnostic workup including abdominal imaging without hydronephrosis. Ultimately, a CT scan performed during an acute pain crisis clearly identified right-sided hydronephrosis. The keys to diagnosis are awareness of this entity, a detailed history, and obtaining imaging studies during a crisis. The patient subsequently underwent a right robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with preservation of a lower pole crossing vessel. We highlight noteworthy features of the clinical presentation and surgical repair

Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis of a Lower Pole Moiety in a Duplicated Collecting System Kidney

Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP) is a destructive inflammatory process which is frequently caused by recurrent urinary tract infections or chronic obstruction by kidney stones. We present a 56-year-old female with an extensive retroperitoneal urinoma and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis of the lower pole moiety in a kidney with a duplicated collecting system due to obstructive nephrolithiasis. After drainage of the urinoma, the patient underwent a definitive lower pole heminephrectomy with preservation of the functional upper pole. We review important clinical features of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis and considerations for surgery on a duplicated kidney

Relieving nasal congestion in children with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: efficacy and safety studies of mometasone furoate nasal spray

Background In surveys of children with allergic rhinitis (AR), nasal congestion has been identified as the most frequently experienced and bothersome symptom. This analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) on congestion in children with AR.Methods Two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies randomly assigned children to MFNS 100 μg or placebo, 1 spray/nostril QD for 4 weeks (Study 1: ages 6–11 years with seasonal AR [SAR] ≥1 year; Study 2: ages 3–11 years with perennial AR [PAR] ≥1 year). Least square (LS) means were obtained from an ANCOVA model with treatment and study center effects, with baseline score as a covariate. We conducted post hoc evaluation of changes from baseline in AM/PM PRIOR (average of reflective AM and PM scores) nasal congestion (0=none to 3=severe).Results Study 1: MFNS (n=134) reduced congestion significantly more than placebo (n=135) on day 2 (P=.004) and on 23/29 days (P≤.037). Change from baseline was −0.53 and −0.28 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1–15 and −0.64 and −0.38 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1–29. Study 2: MFNS (n=185) reduced congestion significantly more than placebo (n=189) on day 3 (P=.015) and on 22/29 days (P≤.047). Change from baseline was −0.56 and −0.36 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1–15 and −0.64 and −0.45 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1–29. MFNS was well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events.Conclusion MFNS effectively relieved nasal congestion and was well tolerated in children with SAR or PAR. Keywords: Mometasone furoate nasal spray, Placebo, Pediatric, Nasal congestion, Allergic rhinitis, Efficacy, Safety, Controlled clinical tria