Additional results derived by using different fusion approaches: Dist-opt means weighted by the distance to the individual models optimal thresholds; dist-05 means weighted by the distance to the default threshold of 0.5; avg denotes the fusion by conducting a simple average of all scores; perf means weighted based on the individual models validation performance in a way that better performing models contribute more to the fused result.

Additional results derived by using different fusion approaches: Dist-opt means weighted by the distance to the individual models optimal thresholds; dist-05 means weighted by the distance to the default threshold of 0.5; avg denotes the fusion by conducting a simple average of all scores; perf means weighted based on the individual models validation performance in a way that better performing models contribute more to the fused result.</p

S5 Dataset -

Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.</div

AUROC values as well as 95% bootstrapped CIs for the three test cohorts and all evolved models.

AUROC values as well as 95% bootstrapped CIs for the three test cohorts and all evolved models.</p

Schematic diagram of the different models.

The red box shows the pipeline for MelanA-stained WSIs and the purple box the pipeline for H&E-stained WSIs. We tessellated MelanA-stained WSIs corresponding to different magnifications and trained individual models on each tile size. The class probabilities for each tile were predicted and aggregated into a slide score by averaging all tile scores. For the H&E-based model we proceeded in the same way.</p

S4 Dataset -

Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.</div

Description of the population in our datasets.

For continuous features we report median, range, and number of NAs, for categorical features we report the total number of observations per group. Here the training population as well as all three test populations are described. Melanoma in situ describes the early stage of a malignant melanoma that has not yet broken through the basement membrane. However, features at the cellular level do not differ between melanoma in situ and malignant melanoma.</p

Hyperparameters of all evolved models.

Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.</div

Antibodies and parameters of staining methods used by the different clinics.

Antibodies and parameters of staining methods used by the different clinics.</p

ROC plots by data modality with corresponding AUROC values.

A: Results from Dresden B: Results from Erlangen C: Results from Naples. Red: MelanA-based performance taking all magnifications into account Purple: H&E-based performance Black: combined model using H&E as well as MelanA by aggregating the individual scores. (TIF)</p

S2 Dataset -

Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.</div