Corrected SPV scores of the groups of sensory loss.

<p>Group 0: No sensory loss; Group 1: Mild sensory loss; Group 2: Moderate sensory loss; Group 3: Severe sensory loss; Group 4: Highly severe sensory loss. SPVc: Corrected right head-on-body tilt scores of the Subjective Postural Vertical.</p

Total corrected Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV) scores and different head-on-body tilt (corrected) SPV scores of all patients and in separate groups based on sensory loss.

<p>Total corrected Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV) scores and different head-on-body tilt (corrected) SPV scores of all patients and in separate groups based on sensory loss.</p

Clinical and demographic data.

<p>Clinical and demographic data.</p

Corrected SVV scores of the groups of sensory loss.

<p>Group 0: No sensory loss; Group 1: Mild sensory loss; Group 2: Moderate sensory loss; Group 3: Severe sensory loss; Group 4: Highly severe sensory loss. SVVc: Corrected right head-on-body tilt scores of the Subjective Visual Vertical.</p

Descriptives of all patients and in separate groups based on sensory loss.

<p>Descriptives of all patients and in separate groups based on sensory loss.</p

Supplemental Material - Is a portable pressure plate an alternative to force plates for measuring postural stability and interlimb coordination of quiet standing balance control?

Supplemental Material for Is a portable pressure plate an alternative to force plates for measuring postural stability and interlimb coordination of quiet standing balance control? by Jonas Schröder, Ann Hallemans, Wim Saeys, Laetitia Yperzeele, Gert Kwakkel and Steven Truijen in Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering</p

METs*minutes and Energy Expenditure values measured by two activity diaries and an Activity monitor in 16 stroke patients.

<p>Abbreviations: P25-P75 =  percentile 25–75. <u>Metabolic Equivalents (METs)-values</u>: Diary: METs- values per activity based on Compendium of Ainsworth²⁰×30 minutes, subdivided in sedentary activity (≤1 METs), light activity (>1-<3 METs), moderate activity (3–6 METs), vigorous activity (>6 METs). Activity monitor: calculated by SenseWear Pro 2 armband. <u>Energy expenditure kilocalories (kcal/12 h)-values</u>: Diary: kcal/12 h calculated by ((METs valuereported per activity ×3.5×patients weight)/200×30minutes)²³×24. Activity monitor: kcal/12 h calculated by SenseWear Pro 2 armband.</p

Demographic and clinical characteristics of included patients.

<p>Abbreviations: d = days, SD =  standard deviation, % =  percentage, RMA-GF =  Rivermead Motor Assessment Gross Function, FAC =  Functional Ambulation Categories, n =  number, IQR =  Interquartile Range.</p

Comparing total Mets*minutes in 16 stroke patients: activity monitor versus patient diary.

<p>Total Mets*minutes of activity monitor was compared with diary of stroke patients. Broken horizontal lines represent percentiles 25 and 75, bold solid lines represent the median value of difference. Data analysis showed no good level of agreement between patient diary and the activity monitor (Median = 352.24; P25 = 242.44; P75 = 601.46). Visual inspection revealed no systematic bias.</p

Comparing energy expenditure in 16 stroke patients: observational diary versus patient diary.

<p>Energy expenditure (kcal/12 h) of observer activity diary was compared with diary of stroke patients. Broken horizontal lines represent percentiles 25 and 75 value, bold solid lines represent the median value of difference. Data analysis showed good agreement between both diaries (Median = 91.90; P25 = 2.57; P75 = 194.51). Most data are clustered around the zero point.</p