2 research outputs found

    Synthesis, NMR, and X‑ray Studies of Iridium Dihydride C,N and N,P Ligand Complexes

    No full text
    The iridium­(III) dihydride complexes [Ir­(H)<sub>2</sub>(L1)­(6,6′-bi-2-picoline)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>5</b>; L1 = (<i>S</i>)-1-[2-(2-adamantan-2-yl-4,5-dihydro­oxazol-4-yl)-ethyl]-3-(2,6-diisopropyl­phenyl)-1,2-dihydro­imidazol-2-ylidene, BAr<sub>F</sub> = tetrakis­[3,5-bis­(trifluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­borate) and [Ir­(H)<sub>2</sub>(L2)­(6,6′-bi-2-picoline)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>6</b>; L2 = (<i>R</i>)-2-((di-<i>tert</i>-butyl­phosphanyl)­methyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro­oxazole) were prepared from the corresponding [Ir­(COD)­(L)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> precursors by treatment with 6,6′-bi-2-picoline under H<sub>2</sub> and characterized by 2D NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. In solution, the N,P complex <b>6</b> exists as two isomeric dihydride species (<b>6a</b> and <b>6b</b>) that are in rapid equilibrium at room temperature. Furthermore, the X-ray structures for [Ir­(COD)­(L1)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>1</b>) and [Ir­(COD)­(L2)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>2</b>) are reported. The structural comparison of the solid-state structures of the iridium­(I) precursor <b>1</b> and the iridium­(III) dihydride complex <b>5</b> revealed a significant change in the backbone geometry of the C,N ligand. The original U-shaped conformation of the ligand switches to an S-shaped conformation, and therefore, the substituent in the oxazoline ring occupies different quadrants in the iridium coordination sphere. Notable in this context is the finding that a similar switch in the ligand backbone was observed for the C,N iridium­(III) dihydride olefin species <b>3</b> ([Ir­(H)<sub>2</sub>[(<i>E</i>)-1-methyl-4-(1-phenylprop-1-en-2-yl)­benzene-D<sub>5</sub>]­(L1)]­BAr<sub>F</sub>), which represents a catalytically competent intermediate

    Characterization and Reactivity Studies of Dinuclear Iridium Hydride Complexes Prepared from Iridium Catalysts with N,P and C,N Ligands under Hydrogenation Conditions

    No full text
    The dinuclear iridium hydride complexes [IrH­(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)­(L1)­(μ-H)]<sub>2</sub>­(BAr<sub>F</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>7</b>; L1 = (<i>S</i>)-2-(2-((di­phenyl­phos­phanyl)­oxy)­propan-2-yl)-4-isopropyl-4,5-dihydrooxazole, BAr<sub>F</sub> = tetrakis­[3,5-bis­(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­borate), [IrH­(CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>)­(L1)­(μ-H)]<sub>2</sub>­(BAr<sub>F</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>8</b>), [IrH­(L2)­(μ-H)]<sub>2</sub>­(BAr<sub>F</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>9a</b>; L2 = (<i>S</i>)-1-[2-(2-adamantan-2-yl-4,5-dihydro­oxazol-4-yl)-ethyl]-3-(2,6-diiso­propyl­phenyl)-1,2-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene), and [IrH­(L3)­(μ-H)]<sub>2</sub>­(BAr<sub>F</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>9b</b>; L3 = (<i>S</i>)-1-[2-(2-<i>tert</i>-butyl-4,5-dihydrooxazol-4-yl)-ethyl]-3-(2,6-diiso­propyl­phenyl)-1,2-dihydro­imidazol-2-ylidene) were prepared from the corresponding mononuclear [Ir­(COD)­(L)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> precursors by treatment with H<sub>2</sub> and characterized by 2D NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Conversion to a trinuclear iridium hydride complex, which is usually observed for N,P iridium hydride complexes, is inhibited by addition of 0.5 equiv of [H­(OEt<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]­BAr<sub>F</sub> or acetonitrile. Reactions with acetonitrile or 6,6′-bi-2-picoline afforded the mononuclear iridium dihydride complexes [Ir­(H)<sub>2</sub>­(CH<sub>3</sub>­CN)<sub>2</sub>­(L1)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>5</b>), [Ir­(H)<sub>2</sub>­(CH<sub>3</sub>­CN)<sub>2</sub>­(L3)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>10</b>), or [Ir­(H)<sub>2</sub>­(6,6′-bi-2-picoline)­(L3)]­BAr<sub>F</sub> (<b>11</b>). The CH<sub>3</sub>CN complexes <b>7</b> and <b>10</b> are inactive as hydrogenation catalysts. In contrast, the coordinatively unsaturated dinuclear complexes <b>9a</b> and <b>9b</b> are active catalysts for the hydrogenation of (<i>E</i>)-1,2-diphenyl-1-propene at 50 bar hydrogen pressure
    corecore