Towards ending the animal cognition war: a three-dimensional model of causal cognition

Debates in animal cognition are frequently polarized between the romantic view that some species have human-like causal understanding and the killjoy view that human causal reasoning is unique. These apparently endless debates are often characterized by conceptual confusions and accusations of straw-men positions. What is needed is an account of causal understanding that enables researchers to investigate both similarities and differences in cognitive abilities in an incremental evolutionary framework. Here we outline the ways in which a three-dimensional model of causal understanding fulfills these criteria. We describe how this approach clarifies what is at stake, illuminates recent experiments on both physical and social cognition, and plots a path for productive future research that avoids the romantic/killjoy dichotomy.Introduction Dissecting disagreement - Principles of interpretation - A big misunderstanding and the conceptual question The conceptual space of causal cognition - Causal information -- Difference‑making accounts of causality -- Geometrical–mechanical accounts - Difference‑making and geometrical–mechanical aspects of human concept of causation - Understanding causality - Parameters of causal cognition -- a) Sources of causal information -- b) Integration -- c) Explicitness From causal cognition to causal understanding - A three‑dimensional model of causal cognition - The evolution of causal cognition and the nature of causal understanding - The metrics of the model and future research Conclusio

Enzymatic oxidation of neobetanin monitored by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection

The aim of this study was monitoring of enzymatic oxidation of neobetanin, an interesting type of betalains which is a partially oxidized betacyanin. As it belongs to betalains, it is water soluble and non-toxic, but a presence of a few functional groups makes it very reactive. Oxidation reactions were performed using horseradish peroxidase followed by spectrophotometric and mass spectrometric detection (LC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS) of obtained products. Enzymatic oxidation of neobetanin leads to a formation of new decarboxy- and dehydro-derivatives. The main identified oxidation product is 2-decarboxy-2,3-dehydroneobetanin. Searching for all formed oxidation products is extremely important for elucidation of the betalains oxidation mechanism

Anthropomorphism and anthropectomy as friendly competitors

Principles help comparative psychologists select from among multiple hypotheses that account for the data. Anthropomorphic principles select hypotheses that have the most human–animal similarities while anthropectic principles select hypotheses that have the most human–animal differences. I argue that there is no way for the comparative psychologist on their own to justify their selection of one principle over the other. However, the comparative psychologist can justify their selection of one principle over the other in virtue of being members of comparative psychology as a community. As it turns out, though, this justifies both competing principles: the community benefits most from competition between the two principles so comparative psychologists are justified in implementing the principles by which they can best contribute to the competition. Thus, I argue that common arguments to unify principle implementation in comparative psychology are defeated by the conservative arguments to preserve and foster competition