Pearson Product-Moment Correlations.

<p>Pearson Product-Moment Correlations.</p

Descriptive Statistics.

<p>Descriptive Statistics.</p

Impact of emotional intelligence on reaction times.

<p>Scatterplots illustrate the correlation between total EI and the reaction times for the “ironic” category calculated for slightly incongruent stimuli (<i>N</i> = 20, <i>r</i> = -.48, <i>p</i> = .02, one-tailed).</p

Pearson’s correlation coefficient values between emotional intelligence and the mean reaction times for the four categories across the three congruence conditions.

<p>Pearson’s correlation coefficient values between emotional intelligence and the mean reaction times for the four categories across the three congruence conditions.</p

Spearman’s rho values between emotional intelligence and nonverbal dominance for the two incongruent conditions.

<p>Spearman’s rho values between emotional intelligence and nonverbal dominance for the two incongruent conditions.</p

Emotional intelligence assessed with help of the MSCEIT.

<p>Emotional intelligence assessed with help of the MSCEIT.</p

Overview of the different stimulus combinations.

<p>Overview of the different stimulus combinations.</p

Choice frequencies and reaction times for the four categories across the three congruence conditions.

<p>Choice frequencies and reaction times for the four categories across the three congruence conditions.</p

Impact of emotional intelligence on nonverbal dominance.

<p>Scatterplots illustrate the correlation between total EI and nonverbal dominance observed while rating slightly incongruent stimuli (<i>N</i> = 18, <i>r</i>_s = .52, <i>p</i> = .01, one-tailed).</p

Nonverbal dominance.

<p>The bars represent the average nonverbal dominance observed while rating slightly (left bar) and strongly incongruent stimuli (right bar). Error bars represent the standard errors of the means (<i>N</i> = 18). Significant differences are marked with asterisks (*** <i>p</i> < .001).</p