2 research outputs found
Simulating and Explaining Passive Air Sampling Rates for Semivolatile Compounds on Polyurethane Foam Passive Samplers
Passive
air samplers (PAS) including polyurethane foam (PUF) are
widely deployed as an inexpensive and practical way to sample semivolatile
pollutants. However, concentration estimates from PAS rely on constant
empirical mass transfer rates, which add unquantified uncertainties
to concentrations. Here we present a method for modeling hourly sampling
rates for semivolatile compounds from hourly meteorology using first-principle
chemistry, physics, and fluid dynamics, calibrated from depuration
experiments. This approach quantifies and explains observed effects
of meteorology on variability in compound-specific sampling rates
and analyte concentrations, simulates nonlinear PUF uptake, and recovers
synthetic hourly concentrations at a reference temperature. Sampling
rates are evaluated for polychlorinated biphenyl congeners at a network
of Harner model samplers in Chicago, IL, during 2008, finding simulated
average sampling rates within analytical uncertainty of those determined
from loss of depuration compounds and confirming quasilinear uptake.
Results indicate hourly, daily, and interannual variability in sampling
rates, sensitivity to temporal resolution in meteorology, and predictable
volatility-based relationships between congeners. We quantify the
importance of each simulated process to sampling rates and mass transfer
and assess uncertainty contributed by advection, molecular diffusion,
volatilization, and flow regime within the PAS, finding that PAS chamber
temperature contributes the greatest variability to total process
uncertainty (7.3%)
Variations of Flame Retardant, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon, and Pesticide Concentrations in Chicago’s Atmosphere Measured using Passive Sampling
Atmospheric
concentrations of flame retardants, polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, and pesticides were measured using passive air samplers
equipped with polyurethane foam disks to find spatial information
in and around Chicago, Illinois. Samplers were deployed around the
greater Chicago area for intervals of 6 weeks from 2012 to 2013 (inclusive).
Volumes were calculated using passive sampling theory and were based
on meteorology and the compounds’ octanol–air partition
coefficients. Geometric mean concentrations of total polybrominated
diphenyl ethers ranged from 11 to 150 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, and tributyl
phosphate, <i>tris</i>(2-chloroethyl)Âphosphate, <i>tris</i>(1-chloro-2-propyl)Âphosphate, and triphenyl phosphate
concentrations were in the ranges of 54–290, 32–340,
130–580, and 170–580 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively.
The summed concentrations of 16 PAHs ranged from 8700 to 52 000
pg/m<sup>3</sup> over the sampling area, and DDT, chlordane, and endosulfan
concentrations were in the ranges of 2.7–9.9, 8.2–66,
and 16–85 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Sampling sites were
split into two groups depending on their distances from the Illinois
Institute of Technology campus in Chicago. With a few exceptions,
the concentrations of most compound groups in the city’s center
were the same or slightly higher than those measured >45 km away.
The data also showed that the concentrations measured with a passive
atmospheric sampling system are in good agreement with those measured
with an active, high-volume, sampling system. Given that the sampling
times are different (passive, 43 days; active, 1 day), and that both
of these measured concentrations cover about 5 orders of magnitude,
the agreement between these passive and active sampling methods is
excellent