33 research outputs found

    COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and antithrombotic agents—lessons after 1 year

    Get PDF
    COVID-19 is associated with a high incidence of thrombotic complications, which can be explained by the complex and unique interplay between coronaviruses and endothelial cells, the local and systemic inflammatory response, and the coagulation system. Empirically, an intensified dose of thrombosis prophylaxis is being used in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and several guidelines on this topic have been published, although the insufficiency of high quality and direct evidence has led to weak recommendations. In this Viewpoint we summarise the pathophysiology of COVID-19 coagulopathy in the context of patients who are ambulant, admitted to hospital, and critically ill or non-critically ill, and those post-discharge from hospital. We also review data from randomised controlled trials in the past year of antithrombotic therapy in patients who are critically ill. These data provide the first high-quality evidence on optimal use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with COVID-19. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not routinely recommended for patients who are ambulant and post-discharge. A first ever trial in non-critically ill patients who were admitted to hospital has shown that a therapeutic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin might improve clinical outcomes in this population. In critically ill patients, this same treatment does not improve outcomes and prophylactic dose anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis is recommended. In the upcoming months we expect numerous data from the ongoing antithrombotic COVID-19 studies to guide clinicians at different stages of the disease.http://www.thelancet.com/haematologyam2022Medical Oncolog

    One-year safety and efficacy of mitapivat in sickle cell disease:follow-up results of a phase 2, open-label study

    Get PDF
    Targeting the primary pathogenic event of sickle cell disease (SCD), the polymerization of sickle hemoglobin (HbS), may prevent downstream clinical events. Mitapivat, an oral pyruvate kinase (PK) activator, has therapeutic potential by increasing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and decreasing 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG), a glycolytic red blood cell (RBC) intermediate. In the previously reported 8-week dose-finding period of this phase 2, investigator-initiated, open-label study, mitapivat was well tolerated and showed efficacy in SCD. Here, the 1-year fixed-dose extension period is reported in which 9 of 10 included patients (90%) aged ≥16 years with SCD (HbSS, HbS/β0, or HbS/β+) continued with mitapivat. Mostly mild treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (most commonly, transaminase increase and headache) were still reported. Apart from the reported nontreatment-related serious AE (SAE) of a urinary tract infection in the dose-finding period, 1 nontreatment-related SAE occurred in the fixed-dose extension period in a patient who died of massive pulmonary embolism due to COVID-19. Importantly, sustained improvement in Hb level (mean increase, 1.1 ± 0.7 g/dL; P = .0014) was seen, which was accompanied by decreases in markers of hemolysis. In addition, the annualized rate of vaso-occlusive events reduced significantly from a historic baseline of 1.33 ± 1.32 to 0.64 ± 0.87 (P = .0489) when combining the dose-finding period and fixed-dose extension period. Cellularly, the ATP:2,3-DPG ratio and Hb-oxygen affinity significantly increased and RBC sickling (point of sickling) nonsignificantly reduced. Overall, this study demonstrated 1-year safety and efficacy of treatment with mitapivat in SCD, supporting further evaluation in ongoing phase 2/3 study (RISE UP, NCT05031780). This trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/as NL8517 and EudraCT 2019-003438-18.</p

    Metabolic blood profile and response to treatment with the pyruvate kinase activator mitapivat in patients with sickle cell disease

    Get PDF
    Mitapivat is an investigational, oral, small-molecule allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase (PK). PK is a regulatory glycolytic enzyme that is key in providing the red blood cell (RBC) with sufficient amounts of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In sickle cell disease (SCD), decreased 2,3-DPG levels increase the oxygen affinity of hemoglobin, thereby preventing deoxygenation and polymerization of sickle hemoglobin. The PK activator mitapivat has been shown to decrease levels of 2,3-DPG and increase levels of ATP in RBCs in patients with SCD. In this phase 2, investigator-initiated, open-label study (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ NL8517; EudraCT 2019-003438-18), untargeted metabolomics was used to explore the overall metabolic effects of 8-week treatment with mitapivat in the dose-finding period. In total, 1773 unique metabolites were identified in dried blood spots of whole blood from ten patients with SCD and 42 healthy controls (HCs). The metabolic phenotype of patients with SCD revealed alterations in 139/1773 (7.8%) metabolites at baseline when compared to HCs (false discovery rate-adjusted p &lt; 0.05), including increases of (derivatives of) polyamines, purines, and acyl carnitines. Eight-week treatment with mitapivat in nine patients with SCD altered 85/1773 (4.8%) of the total metabolites and 18/139 (12.9%) of the previously identified altered metabolites in SCD (unadjusted p &lt; 0.05). Effects were observed on a broad spectrum of metabolites and were not limited to glycolytic intermediates. Our results show the relevance of metabolic profiling in SCD, not only to unravel potential pathophysiological pathways and biomarkers in multisystem diseases but also to determine the effect of treatment.</p

    Metabolic blood profile and response to treatment with the pyruvate kinase activator mitapivat in patients with sickle cell disease

    Get PDF
    Mitapivat is an investigational, oral, small-molecule allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase (PK). PK is a regulatory glycolytic enzyme that is key in providing the red blood cell (RBC) with sufficient amounts of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In sickle cell disease (SCD), decreased 2,3-DPG levels increase the oxygen affinity of hemoglobin, thereby preventing deoxygenation and polymerization of sickle hemoglobin. The PK activator mitapivat has been shown to decrease levels of 2,3-DPG and increase levels of ATP in RBCs in patients with SCD. In this phase 2, investigator-initiated, open-label study (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ NL8517; EudraCT 2019-003438-18), untargeted metabolomics was used to explore the overall metabolic effects of 8-week treatment with mitapivat in the dose-finding period. In total, 1773 unique metabolites were identified in dried blood spots of whole blood from ten patients with SCD and 42 healthy controls (HCs). The metabolic phenotype of patients with SCD revealed alterations in 139/1773 (7.8%) metabolites at baseline when compared to HCs (false discovery rate-adjusted p &lt; 0.05), including increases of (derivatives of) polyamines, purines, and acyl carnitines. Eight-week treatment with mitapivat in nine patients with SCD altered 85/1773 (4.8%) of the total metabolites and 18/139 (12.9%) of the previously identified altered metabolites in SCD (unadjusted p &lt; 0.05). Effects were observed on a broad spectrum of metabolites and were not limited to glycolytic intermediates. Our results show the relevance of metabolic profiling in SCD, not only to unravel potential pathophysiological pathways and biomarkers in multisystem diseases but also to determine the effect of treatment.</p

    High Five for Low Five

    No full text

    Aspirin as Thromboprophylaxis in Orthopedic Surgery: A Matter of Perspective

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 295746.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)01 augustus 202

    The Paediatric Haemophilia Activities List (pedHAL) in routine assessment : changes over time, child-parent agreement and informative domains

    No full text
    Introduction: The Paediatric Haemophilia Activities List (pedHAL) assesses self-reported limitations in activities and participation in children with haemophilia. Aim: To assess longitudinal changes, child-parent agreement and to identify which pedHAL domains yielded most information in boys with access to early prophylaxis. Methods: The pedHAL (53 items, 7 domains, optimum 100) was completed annually at the Van Creveldkliniek by boys aged 4-18 years with moderate/severe haemophilia and their parents. Development of the pedHAL in relation to bleeds, changes per domain over 3-5 years, child-parent agreement (% difference child-parent≤|5|) per domain and domain scores (limitations defined as ≤ 95) were determined. Results: Seventy-three patients and their parents (92% severe haemophilia, median age 13.1 years [range 5.4;18.0]) completed ≥1 pedHAL. Median (IQR) pedHAL sum score was 99.5 (95.2;100.0) for children and 99.6 (95.8;100.0) for parents. If patients scored >95 and had no joint and/or muscle bleed, 90.9% of the patients scored >95 at the next assessment. The median change in sum score was 0.0 for both the 3- and 5-year interval. Child-parent agreement varied between domains from 92% (‘self-care’) to 71% (‘sitting/kneeling/standing’). Most limitations were reported in the domains ‘sitting/kneeling/standing’, ‘functions of the legs’ and ‘leisure activities and sports.’. Conclusion: In routine clinical practice in Dutch children on prophylaxis, pedHAL scores were high and remained stable in 3-5 years at group level. In individual patients without joint and/or muscle bleeds, pedHAL scores remained high after 1 year. Child-parent agreement was not optimal which indicated that both child report and parent proxy should be reported

    The Paediatric Haemophilia Activities List (pedHAL) in routine assessment : changes over time, child-parent agreement and informative domains

    No full text
    Introduction: The Paediatric Haemophilia Activities List (pedHAL) assesses self-reported limitations in activities and participation in children with haemophilia. Aim: To assess longitudinal changes, child-parent agreement and to identify which pedHAL domains yielded most information in boys with access to early prophylaxis. Methods: The pedHAL (53 items, 7 domains, optimum 100) was completed annually at the Van Creveldkliniek by boys aged 4-18 years with moderate/severe haemophilia and their parents. Development of the pedHAL in relation to bleeds, changes per domain over 3-5 years, child-parent agreement (% difference child-parent≤|5|) per domain and domain scores (limitations defined as ≤ 95) were determined. Results: Seventy-three patients and their parents (92% severe haemophilia, median age 13.1 years [range 5.4;18.0]) completed ≥1 pedHAL. Median (IQR) pedHAL sum score was 99.5 (95.2;100.0) for children and 99.6 (95.8;100.0) for parents. If patients scored >95 and had no joint and/or muscle bleed, 90.9% of the patients scored >95 at the next assessment. The median change in sum score was 0.0 for both the 3- and 5-year interval. Child-parent agreement varied between domains from 92% (‘self-care’) to 71% (‘sitting/kneeling/standing’). Most limitations were reported in the domains ‘sitting/kneeling/standing’, ‘functions of the legs’ and ‘leisure activities and sports.’. Conclusion: In routine clinical practice in Dutch children on prophylaxis, pedHAL scores were high and remained stable in 3-5 years at group level. In individual patients without joint and/or muscle bleeds, pedHAL scores remained high after 1 year. Child-parent agreement was not optimal which indicated that both child report and parent proxy should be reported
    corecore