6 research outputs found
Mapping Proteolytic Processing in the Secretome of Gastric Cancer-Associated Myofibroblasts Reveals Activation of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP‑3
Cancer
progression involves changes in extracellular proteolysis,
but the contribution of stromal cell secretomes to the cancer degradome
remains uncertain. We have now defined the secretome of a specific
stromal cell type, the myofibroblast, in gastric cancer and its modification
by proteolysis. SILAC labeling and COFRADIC isolation of methionine
containing peptides allowed us to quantify differences in gastric
cancer-derived myofibroblasts compared with myofibroblasts from adjacent
tissue, revealing increased abundance of several proteases in cancer
myofibroblasts including matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-1 and -3.
Moreover, N-terminal COFRADIC analysis identified cancer-restricted
proteolytic cleavages, including liberation of the active forms of
MMP-1, -2, and -3 from their inactive precursors. In vivo imaging
confirmed increased MMP activity when gastric cancer cells were xenografted
in mice together with gastric cancer myofibroblasts. Western blot
and enzyme activity assays confirmed increased MMP-1, -2, and -3 activity
in cancer myofibroblasts, and cancer cell migration assays indicated
stimulation by MMP-1, -2, and -3 in cancer-associated myofibroblast
media. Thus, cancer-derived myofibroblasts differ from their normal
counterparts by increased production and activation of MMP-1, -2,
and -3, and this may contribute to the remodelling of the cancer cell
microenvironment
Mapping Proteolytic Processing in the Secretome of Gastric Cancer-Associated Myofibroblasts Reveals Activation of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP‑3
Cancer
progression involves changes in extracellular proteolysis,
but the contribution of stromal cell secretomes to the cancer degradome
remains uncertain. We have now defined the secretome of a specific
stromal cell type, the myofibroblast, in gastric cancer and its modification
by proteolysis. SILAC labeling and COFRADIC isolation of methionine
containing peptides allowed us to quantify differences in gastric
cancer-derived myofibroblasts compared with myofibroblasts from adjacent
tissue, revealing increased abundance of several proteases in cancer
myofibroblasts including matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-1 and -3.
Moreover, N-terminal COFRADIC analysis identified cancer-restricted
proteolytic cleavages, including liberation of the active forms of
MMP-1, -2, and -3 from their inactive precursors. In vivo imaging
confirmed increased MMP activity when gastric cancer cells were xenografted
in mice together with gastric cancer myofibroblasts. Western blot
and enzyme activity assays confirmed increased MMP-1, -2, and -3 activity
in cancer myofibroblasts, and cancer cell migration assays indicated
stimulation by MMP-1, -2, and -3 in cancer-associated myofibroblast
media. Thus, cancer-derived myofibroblasts differ from their normal
counterparts by increased production and activation of MMP-1, -2,
and -3, and this may contribute to the remodelling of the cancer cell
microenvironment
ChemR23 mediates chemerin stimulation of MSC migration via PKC and MAP kinases.
<p><i>A</i>, Representative images from MSCs stained for vimentin (positive control) and chemR23 revealing knock-down (KD) after ChemR23 siRNA treatment (left). Knockdown of ChemR23, but not GPR1, inhibited MSC migration in response to chemerin (100 ng/ml)(center) and CAM-CM (right). <i>B</i>, Concentration-dependent inhibition of MSC migration in response to chemerin by the ChemR23 antagonist CCX832 (left) but not the control compound CCX826 (1 µM) (center). MSC migration in response to CAM-CM was inhibited similarly by chemerin neutralising antibody, and CCX832, but not CCX826 (1 µM)(right). <i>C</i>, Representative Western blot shows increased phosphorylation of p42/44, p38 and JNK-II kinases in MSCs treated with chemerin (100 ng/ml)(left). In Boyden chamber assays, chemerin-stimulated MSC migration was inhibited by the JNK-II inhibitor, SP600125 (50 µM), the p42/44 inhibitor, UO126 (10 µM), p38 inhibitor SB202190 (3 µM), and the PKC inhibitor Ro320432 (2 µM) but not by PIK3 inhibitor LY294002 (50 µM) (right). Horizontal arrows, p<0.05, ANOVA (n = 3 in each case).</p
Increased MSC homing to xenografts seeded with CAMs and inhibition of homing by the chemR23 receptor antagonist, CCX832.
<p><i>A</i>, Visualisation of PKH67-labelled MSCs in representative fields from xenografts established with OE21 cancer cells alone or co-injected with CAMs followed by treatment with vehicle (top) or CCX832 (bottom) and iv injection of PKH67-labelled MSCs. <i>B</i>, In xenografts with OE21 cancer cells and CAMs there was increased MSC homing expressed as labelled cells per unit area of xenograft compared with xenografts of OE21 cancer cell alone; treatment with CCX832 inhibited homing (OE21/vehicle, n = 3; OE21/CCX832, n = 4; OE21 and CAMs/vehicle, n = 6; OE21 and CAMs/CCX832, n = 6). Horizontal arrows, p<0.05, ANOVA.</p
Chemerin stimulates transendothelial migration of MSCs and requires MMP-2.
<p><i>A</i>, Representative fields from MSC transendothelial migration experiments showing migration of PKH67-labelled MSCs (left). CCX832 (1 µM) inhibited chemerin- (center) and CAM-CM stimulated MSC transendothelial migration but CCX826 (1 µM) had no effect (right). <i>B</i>, Chemerin, and IGF-II used as a positive control, promptly (30 min) stimulated proMMP2 abundance in media as detected by Western blot but had no effect on cellular proMMP2 abundance (left); chemerin significantly increased MMP-2 enzyme activity in MSC media detected by the selective substrate MCA-Pro-Leu-Ala-Nva-Dpa-Ala-Arg-NH<sub>2</sub> (right). <i>C</i>, Human recombinant MMP-2 (80 ng/ml) stimulated transendothelial migration and there was dose-dependent inhibition by an MMP-2 selective inhibitor (MMP-2 inhibitor I) (left). The MMP-2 inhibitor (60 µM) significantly inhibited chemerin-stimulated MSC transendothelial migration (centre). Horizontal arrows, p<0.05, t- test (n = 3).</p
Chemerin exhibits increased expression in CAMs and stimulates MSC migration.
<p><i>A</i>. Representative Western analysis of chemerin in media from ESCC CAMs and ATMs (left). Quantitative analysis by densitometry of chemerin abundance in media from ESCC CAMs and ATMs (n = 4 different pairs of myofibroblasts) (right). <i>B</i>. Concentration-dependent stimulation of MSC migration by chemerin in scratch wound migration assays (left) and Boyden chamber migration assays (right)(n = 3). <i>C</i>. Increased migration of MSCs in Boyden chambers in response to conditioned media (CM) from CAMs and their respective ATMs (left) (n = 4 different pairs of myofibroblasts). Stimulation of MSC migration by CAM-CM was inhibited by chemerin neutralizing antibody (Chem.Ab; 10 µg/ml) (center). MSC migration was decreased in response to CM from CAM1 and CAM4 cells transfected with chemerin siRNA#3 (right). Horizontal arrows, p<0.05, t- test (n = 3).</p