Differences in Plasma LECT2 levels Based on the Presence of (A) Metabolic Syndrome, (B) Dyslipidemia, (C) Hypertension, and (D) Insulin resistance.

<p>Box-plots show the median value and interquartile range of plasma LECT2 levels; open circles indicate outliers from 1.5- to 3.0-fold interquartile range.</p

Odds Ratio for Dyslipidemia and Metabolic Syndrome According to the Levels of LECT2 and VFA.

<p>Odds Ratio for Dyslipidemia and Metabolic Syndrome According to the Levels of LECT2 and VFA.</p

Correlations Between Plasma LECT2 Levels and BMI (A), Body Fat (B), WC (C), VFA (D), SFA (E), and (F).

<p>LECT2 and SFA were log-transformed for analysis.</p

Characteristics of Participants.

<p>Characteristics of Participants.</p

Differences in Plasma LECT2 Levels Between the Participants with High and Low VFA Stratified by High and Low WC (A) or SFA (B) Categories.

<p>Data are expressed as geometric mean and geometric standard deviation. Values in the bar graph represent the number of participants in each category. *<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs. low VFA.</p

Correlations Between Plasma LECT2 Levels and Study Variables.

<p>Correlations Between Plasma LECT2 Levels and Study Variables.</p

Additional file 1 of Association between objectively measured physical activity and body mass index with low back pain: a large-scale cross-sectional study of Japanese men

Table S1-B: Sensitivity Analysis, Table S2-B: Sensitivity Analysis. Sensitivity analysis of the results of the combined “None/Sometime (intermittently)” and “All the time (Persistent)” group of LBP compared to the “All the time (Persistent)” group of LBP. (DOCX 24 kb

Association between baseline ALM indices or leg muscle power and incidence of metabolic syndrome (Cox model) (N = 346).

Association between baseline ALM indices or leg muscle power and incidence of metabolic syndrome (Cox model) (N = 346).</p

Baseline characteristics of the study participants according to relative ALM against square height (N = 346).

Baseline characteristics of the study participants according to relative ALM against square height (N = 346).</p

Baseline characteristics of the study participants according to relative ALM against body weight (N = 346).

Baseline characteristics of the study participants according to relative ALM against body weight (N = 346).</p