Analisis Pemasaran Buah Pepaya di Desa Matungkas Kecamatan Dimembe Kabupaten Minahasa Utara

This study aimed to describe marketing papaya fruit on each marketing channel in the village Matungkas Village, North Minahasa District. The research was conducted from February to April 2016. The data used are primary data. The research was done by using purposive sampling with the total number of respondents 45 people. Analysis of the data used is descriptive to portray marketing channels and marketing margin analysis and farmer share. The results showed that there are three patterns of marketing channels, namely: (1) marketing channels first (farmer-traders-retailers) with a marketing margin on the first channel of Rp 8.64 million / trip and farmer share of 40.00 percent. (2) a second marketing channel (farmers, retailers, the district / province) with a marketing margin on retailers in the district amounted to Rp 4,200,000 and farmer share of 58.82 percent, while the marketing margin on retailers in the province amounted to Rp 9.6 million / trip and farmer share of 50.00 percent. (3) The third marketing channel (farmer-consumer) with a marketing margin of Rp 2,400,000 and farmer share 100 percent. The most efficient marketing channel is channel marketing and channel marketing two third is the channel which is very profitable for farmers

The Impact of Policy Application on Milk Industry to The Social Welfare

An assessment to identify and qualify the impact of policy application on milk industry in Indonesia has been carried out to estimate the extent of profit and loss obtained by milk industry producers, including the government . The development of milk industry in Indonesia in the last decade has been very significant supported by the government. Application policy of BUSEP ratio since 1982 was very powerful in order to give protection to dairy farmers, this consider a non-tariff barrier policy. Nevertheless, since the Gol has signed the memorandum of understanding with IMF in January 1988 of the elimination for nontariff barrier policy, the application of BUSEP ratio has also denied. Through comparative static analysis, it could be shown that the application of BUSEP ratio decreased economic development due to decreasing consumer surplus, increasing producer surplus and decreasing net social welfare. Fiscal policy such as application of import tariff may also decrease the economic development, however it could decrease the import volume, with the assumption of unchanged export volume, it results trade surplus. The application of 5% import tariff of milk may decrease consumer surplus, increase producer surplus and government revenue from tax along with its dead weight loss. Application of import tariff from the government has resulted decreasing net social welfare. Key words: Policy analysis, milk industry, producer and consumer surplus, and social welfar