High-risk early-stage ovarian cancer. Randomized clinical trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus whole abdominal radiotherapy

From 1985 to 1989 70 patients with high-risk FIGO Stage I-II ovarian carcinoma entered a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy (CT: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses) versus whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) given according to the open-field technique (43.2 Gy/24 fractions to the pelvis and 30.2 Gy to the upper abdomen). Protocol violations occurred in 8 patients randomized to WAR who received CT because of their own and/or physician's decision. Since protocol compliance was poor and accrual low the study was prematurely closed. Treatment-related toxicity for patients receiving CT was mild and tolerable, consisting chiefly of controllable grade 3 emesis (71%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was experienced by 28% of patients treated with WAR; severe enteritis requiring hospitalization was observed in 2 patients. Late bowel obstruction requiring surgery was observed in 1 patient. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients died and 23 relapsed. Five-year survival was 71% and 53% (p = .16), while relapse-free survival was 74% and 50% (p = .07) for CT and WAR, respectively. Although no firm conclusion can be drawn from the present study, a short-term CT, including cisplatin, appears a safe treatment in comparison to WAR

High-risk early-stage ovarian cancer. Randomized clinical trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus whole abdominal radiotherapy.

From 1985 to 1989 70 patients with high-risk FIGO Stage I-II ovarian carcinoma entered a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy (CT: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses) versus whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) given according to the open-field technique (43.2 Gy/24 fractions to the pelvis and 30.2 Gy to the upper abdomen). Protocol violations occurred in 8 patients randomized to WAR who received CT because of their own and/or physician's decision. Since protocol compliance was poor and accrual low the study was prematurely closed. Treatment-related toxicity for patients receiving CT was mild and tolerable, consisting chiefly of controllable grade 3 emesis (71\%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was experienced by 28\% of patients treated with WAR; severe enteritis requiring hospitalization was observed in 2 patients. Late bowel obstruction requiring surgery was observed in 1 patient. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients died and 23 relapsed. Five-year survival was 71\% and 53\% (p = .16), while relapse-free survival was 74\% and 50\% (p = .07) for CT and WAR, respectively. Although no firm conclusion can be drawn from the present study, a short-term CT, including cisplatin, appears a safe treatment in comparison to WAR

High-risk early-stage ovarian cancer. Randomized clinical trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus whole abdominal radiotherapy.

From 1985 to 1989 70 patients with high-risk FIGO Stage I-II ovarian carcinoma entered a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy (CT: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses) versus whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) given according to the open-field technique (43.2 Gy/24 fractions to the pelvis and 30.2 Gy to the upper abdomen). Protocol violations occurred in 8 patients randomized to WAR who received CT because of their own and/or physician's decision. Since protocol compliance was poor and accrual low the study was prematurely closed. Treatment-related toxicity for patients receiving CT was mild and tolerable, consisting chiefly of controllable grade 3 emesis (71%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was experienced by 28% of patients treated with WAR; severe enteritis requiring hospitalization was observed in 2 patients. Late bowel obstruction requiring surgery was observed in 1 patient. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients died and 23 relapsed. Five-year survival was 71% and 53% (p = .16), while relapse-free survival was 74% and 50% (p = .07) for CT and WAR, respectively. Although no firm conclusion can be drawn from the present study, a short-term CT, including cisplatin, appears a safe treatment in comparison to WAR

High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in suboptimal ovarian cancer: a randomized study of the Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest.

The aim of the study was to compare high-versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin as primary chemotherapy for suboptimal stage III and IV ovarian cancer.One hundred forty-five patients were randomized to receive six courses of cisplatin 50 or 100 mg/m2 plus epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The two treatment arms were well balanced; all patients had greater than 2 cm and 37.2\% had greater than 5 cm of residual disease; 29.6\% had stage IV disease.Patients in the high-dose arm received a double dose-intensity and double total dose of cisplatin. The high-dose regimen induced significantly more episodes of leukopenia (47.8\% v 32.8\%, P = .05), thrombocytopenia (21.7\% v 3.2\%, P = .003), anemia (37.6\% v 12.5\%, P = .002), nephrotoxicity (six v one patient), and neurotoxicity (30.4\% v 6.3\%, P = .002). There were no significant differences in efficacy in terms of clinical response rate (high-dose 57.5\% v low-dose 61.1\%), pathologic complete response (CR) (9.6\% v 18.1\%), median survival times (29 v 24 months), and median progression-free survival (18 v 13 months).This study shows that doubling the dose-intensity and total dose of cisplatin in combination with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide has significant toxic effects and does not improve clinical outcome in patients with suboptimal ovarian cancer