Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease

Background: Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One of the aims of therapy is to inhibit the breakdown of a chemical neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, by blocking the relevant enzyme. This can be done by a group of chemicals known as cholinesterase inhibitors. Objectives: The objective of this review is to assess whether donepezil improves the well-being of patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Search strategy: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' and 'Aricept' on 5 April 2006. This Register contains up-to-date records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. Members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc were contacted. Selection criteria: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was compared with placebo for patients with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted by one reviewer (JSB), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the pooled treatment effects, or the risks and benefits of treatment estimated. Main results: 24 trials are included, involving 5796 participants, of which 15 reported results in sufficient detail for the metaanalyses. Most trials were of 6months or less duration in selected patients. Patients in 20 trials had mild tomoderate disease, in two trials moderate to severe, and in two severe disease. Available outcome data cover domains including cognitive function, activities of daily living, behaviour, global clinical state, adverse events and health care resource costs. For cognition there is a statistically significant improvement for both 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil at 24 weeks compared with placebo on the ADAS-Cog scale (-2.01 points MD, 95%CI -2.69 to -1.34, P < 0.00001); -2.80 points, MD 95% CI -3.74 to -2.10, P < 0.00001) and for 10 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo at 24 weeks (5.55 SIB points, 95% CI 3.60 to 7.49, p<0.00001) and 52 weeks (1.84 MMSE points, 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.15, P =0.006). The results show some improvement in global clinical state (assessed by a clinician) in people treated with 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil compared with placebo at 24 weeks for the number of patients showing improvement (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.19, P = < 0.00001, OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.35, P < 0.00001). Benefits of treatment were also seen on measures of activities of daily living and behaviour, but not on the quality of life score. There were significantly more withdrawals before the end of treatment from the 10 mg/day (289/1125 24% 10 mg/day vs 219/1079 20% placebo, OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.65, P = 0.003) but not the 5 mg/day, (100/561 18% 5 mg/day vs 109/568 19% placebo, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.24, P = 0.56) donepezil group compared with placebo which may have resulted in some overestimation of beneficial changes at 10 mg/day. Benefits on the 10 mg/day dose were marginally larger than on the 5 mg/day dose. The results were similar for all severities of disease. Two studies presented results for health resource use, and the associated costs. There were no significant differences between treatment and placebo for any item, the cost of any item, and for the total costs, and total costs including the informal carer costs. Many adverse events were recorded, with more incidents of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, muscle cramps, dizziness, fatigue and anorexia (significant risk associated with treatment) in the 10 mg/day group, compared with placebo. There were more incidents of anorexia, diarrhoea, and muscle cramps in the 5 mg/day group compared with placebo, but not of dizziness, fatigue, nausea or vomiting. Very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention. Authors' conclusions: People with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12,

Treatments for Alzheimer's disease.

Treatments for Alzheimer's disease

The effective treatment of severe repetitive behaviour with fluvoxamine in a 20 year old autistic female

The case of a 20 year old autistic woman with disabling repetitive behaviour that responded dramatically to treatment with fluvoxamine is reported. The connection between repetitive symptoms in autism and obsessive-compulsive disorder is considered, and the need for further evaluation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in autism is discussed. © 1995 Rapid Science Publishers

Propentofylline for dementia.

BACKGROUND: Propentofylline is a novel therapeutic agent for dementia that readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and acts by blocking the uptake of adenosine and inhibiting the enzyme phosphodiesterase. In vitro and in vivo its mechanism of action appears to be twofold; it inhibits the production of free radicals and reduces the activation of microglial cells. It therefore interacts with the inflammatory processes that are thought to contribute to dementia, and given its mechanism of action is a possible disease modifying agent rather than a purely symptomatic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of propentofylline for people with dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 5 February 2003. Aventis, the manufacturing pharmaceutical company, was asked for data from unpublished studies but declined to enter into correspondence. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded double-blind randomized controlled trials of propentofylline compared with a placebo or another treatment group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: There were detailed reports of only four of the nine included studies. The efficacy of propentofylline was reviewed for undifferentiated dementia as there were not enough data to attempt a subgroup analysis for the types of dementia. MAIN RESULTS: The following statistically significant treatment effects in favour of propentofylline are reported. Cognition at 3, 6 and 12 months including MMSE at 12 months. [MD 1.2, 95%CI 0.12 to 2.28, P=0.03] Severity of dementia at 3, 6 and 12 months including CGI at 12 months [MD -0.21, 95%CI -0.39 to -0.03, P=0.03]. Activities of Daily Living (NAB) at 6 and 12 months [MD -1.20, 95%CI -2.22 to -0.18, P=0.02]. Global Assessment (CGI) at 3 months [MD -0.48, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.21, P=0.0006], but not at later times. Tolerability There were minimal data on adverse effects and drop-outs. There were a statistically significant treatment effects in favour of placebo at 12 months, for the number of dropouts, [OR=1.43, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.90, P=0.03]. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence that propentofylline might benefit cognition, global function and activities of daily living of people with Alzheimer's disease and/or vascular dementia. The meta-analyses reported here are far from satisfactory as a summary of the efficacy of propentofylline, considering the unpublished information on another 1200 patients in randomized trials that exists. Unfortunately Aventis has been unwilling to correspond with the authors, significantly limiting the scope of this review

Understanding and managing fronto-temporal dementia

Fronto-temporal Dementia is a relatively common cause of dementia, usually beginning before the age of 65. The onset is insidious and patients commonly present with personality change and psychiatric problems such as depression. Personal and social awareness is lost at an early stage. Cognitive testing also reveals defects in planning, sequencing and judgement. Speech is affected with perseveration, loss of verbal fluency and anomia. There is focal brain atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes and this is related to the pattern of clinical and behavioural presentation. Other areas such as visuospatial orientation and episodic memory are preserved and this distinguishes frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease. Accurate assessment and diagnosis involves detailed psychometric testing, psychiatric history and neuroimaging. Patients present a very different burden of care on relatives and may not be able to access local services. Management mainly involves supporting the carers. Illness progression is gradual and death typically occurs in 6-12 years

Thioridazine for dementia.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic drugs are controversial treatments in dementia, with evidence accumulating that they may hasten clinical decline. Despite these concerns, they are commonly prescribed for elderly and demented patients. Thioridazine, a phenothiazine neuroleptic, has been commonly prescribed because it was thought to produce relatively less frequent motor side effects. The drug has significant sedative effect, and it is thought that this is the main mechanism of action in calming and controlling the patient. However, pharmacologically, it also has marked anticholinergic properties that could potentially have a detrimental effect on cognitive function. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of thioridazine in dementia in terms of: 1) efficacy in controlling symptoms 2) cognitive outcome for the patient 3) safety SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and other electronic databases were searched using the terms 'thioridazine', 'melleril', 'dementia' and 'old age'. In addition, Novartis, the pharmaceutical company that developed and markets thioridazine, was approached and asked to release any published or unpublished data they had on file. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded, single-blind or double-blind, randomised trials were identified in which treatment with thioridazine was administered for more than one dose and compared to an alternative intervention in patients with dementia of any aetiology. Trials in which allocation to treatment or comparator were not truly random, or in which treatment allocation was not concealed, were reviewed but are not included in the data analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by the reviewers (VK, CAK and RJH). For continuous and ordinal variables, the main outcome measures of interest were the final assessment score and the change in score from baseline to the final assessment. The assessment scores were provided by behavioural rating scales, clinical global impression scales, functional assessment scales, psychometric test scores, and frequency and severity of adverse events. Data were pooled where appropriate or possible, and the Peto odds ratio (95%CI) or the weighted mean difference (95%CI) estimated. Where possible, intention to treat data were used. MAIN RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that, compared with placebo, thioridazine reduced anxiety symptoms as evidenced by changes on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. However, there was no significant effect on clinical global change, and a non-significant trend for higher adverse effects with thioridazine. Compared to diazepam, thioridazine was superior in terms of some anxiety symptoms, with similar adverse effects. Global clinical evaluation scales did not favour either treatment. Compared to chlormethiazole, thioridazine was significantly inferior when assessed on some items of the CAPE and the Crichton Geriatric Behavioural Rating Scales. Thioridazine was also associated with significantly more dizziness. No superiority for thioridazine was shown in comparisons with etoperidone, loxapine or zuclopenthixol, except to produce fewer side effects than loxapine. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Very limited data are available to support the use of thioridazine in the treatment of dementia. If thioridazine were not currently in widespread clinical use, there would be inadequate evidence to support its introduction. The only positive effect of thioridazine when compared to placebo is the reduction of anxiety. When compared to placebo, other neuroleptics, and other sedatives, it has equal or higher rates of adverse effects. Clinicians should be aware that there is no evidence to support the use of thioridazine in dementia, and its use may expose patients to excess side effects

Thioridazine for dementia.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic drugs are controversial treatments in dementia, with evidence accumulating that they may hasten clinical decline. Despite these concerns, they are commonly prescribed for elderly and demented patients. Thioridazine, a phenothiazine neuroleptic, is one of the most commonly prescribed. It has often been a preferred agent because it is thought to produce relatively less frequent motor side effects. The drug has significant sedative effects, and it is thought that these are the main mechanism of action in calming and controlling the patient. However, pharmacologically, it also has marked anticholinergic properties that could potentially have a detrimental effect on cognitive function. OBJECTIVES: To determine the evidence on which the use of thioridazine in dementia is based in terms of: 1) efficacy in controlling symptoms 2) cognitive outcome for the patient 3) safety SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and other electronic databases were searched using the terms 'thioridazine', 'melleril', 'dementia' and 'old age'. In addition, Novartis, the pharmaceutical company that developed and markets thioridazine, was approached and asked to release any published or unpublished data they had on file. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded, single-blind or double-blind, randomised trials were identified in which treatment with thioridazine was administered for more than one dose and compared to an alternative intervention in patients with dementia of any aetiology. Trials in which allocation to treatment or comparator were not truly random, or in which treatment allocation was not concealed were reviewed but are not included in the data analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by the reviewers (VC, CAK and RJH). For continuous and ordinal variables, the main outcome measures of interest were the final assessment score and the change in score from baseline to the final assessment. The assessment scores were provided by behavioural rating scales, clinical global impression scales, functional assessment scales, psychometric test scores, and frequency and severity of adverse events. Data were pooled where appropriate or possible, and the Peto odds ratio (95%CI) or the weighted mean difference (95%CI) estimated. Where possible, intention to treat data were used. MAIN RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that, compared with placebo, thioridazine reduced anxiety symptoms as evidenced by changes on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. However, there was no significant effect on clinical global change, and a non-significant trend for higher adverse effects with thioridazine. Compared to diazepam, thioridazine was superior in terms of some anxiety symptoms, with similar adverse effects. Global clinical evaluation scales mostly did not favour either treatment. Compared to chlormethiazole, thioridazine was significantly inferior when assessed on some items of the CAPE and the Crichton Geriatric Behavioural Rating Scales. Thioridazine was also associated with significantly more dizziness. No superiority for thioridazine was shown in comparisons with etoperidone, loxapine or zuclopenthixol. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Very limited data are available to support the use of thioridazine in the treatment of dementia. If thioridazine were not currently in widespread clinical use, there would be inadequate evidence to support its introduction. The only positive effect of thioridazine when compared to placebo is the reduction of anxiety. When compared to placebo, other neuroleptics, and other sedatives it has equal or higher rates of adverse effects. Clinicians should be aware that there is no evidence to support the use of thioridazine in dementia, and its use may expose patients to excess side effects

Drug treatments for Alzheimer's disease

Drug treatments for Alzheimer's diseas

Using the QOL-AD in the UK

Using the QOL-AD in the U

Non-Alzheimer dementias in young patients.

Non-Alzheimer dementias in young patients