5 research outputs found
Temperature Dependent Border Trap Response Produced by a Defective Interfacial Oxide Layer in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/InGaAs Gate Stacks
Intentional
oxidation of an As<sub>2</sub>-decapped (100) In<sub>0.57</sub>Ga<sub>0.43</sub>As substrate by additional H<sub>2</sub>O dosing during
initial Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> gate dielectric
atomic layer deposition (ALD) increases the interface trap density
(<i>D</i><sub>it</sub>), lowers the band edge photoluminescence
(PL) intensity, and generates Ga-oxide detected by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS). Aberration-corrected high resolution transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) reveals formation of an amorphous interfacial
layer which is distinct from the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> dielectric
and which is not present without the additional H<sub>2</sub>O dosing.
Observation of a temperature dependent border trap response, associated
with the frequency dispersion of the accumulation capacitance and
conductance of metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) structures, is found
to be correlated with the presence of this defective interfacial layer.
MOS capacitors prepared with additional H<sub>2</sub>O dosing show
a notable decrease (∼20%) of accumulation dispersion over 5
kHz to 500 kHz when the measurement temperature decreases from room
temperature to 77 K, while capacitors prepared with an abrupt Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/InGaAs interface display little change (<2%)
with temperature. Similar temperature-dependent border trap response
is also observed when the (100) InGaAs surface is treated with a previously
reported HClÂ(aq) wet cleaning procedure prior to Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ALD. These results point out the sensitivity of the temperature
dependence of the border trap response in metal oxide/III–V
MOS gate stacks to the presence of processing-induced interface oxide
layers, which alter the dynamics of carrier trapping at defects that
are not located at the semiconductor interface
Dual Passivation of Intrinsic Defects at the Compound Semiconductor/Oxide Interface Using an Oxidant and a Reductant
Studies have shown that metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors fabricated utilizing compound semiconductors as the channel are limited in their electrical performance. This is attributed to imperfections at the semiconductor/oxide interface which cause electronic trap states, resulting in inefficient modulation of the Fermi level. The physical origin of these states is still debated mainly because of the difficulty in assigning a particular electronic state to a specific physical defect. To gain insight into the exact source of the electronic trap states, density functional theory was employed to model the intrinsic physical defects on the InGaAs (2 × 4) surface and to model the effective passivation of these defects by utilizing both an oxidant and a reductant to eliminate metallic bonds and dangling-bond-induced strain at the interface. Scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy were employed to experimentally determine the physical and electronic defects and to verify the effectiveness of dual passivation with an oxidant and a reductant. While subsurface chemisorption of oxidants on compound semiconductor substrates can be detrimental, it has been shown theoretically and experimentally that oxidants are critical to removing metallic defects at oxide/compound semiconductor interfaces present in nanoscale channels, oxides, and other nanostructures
Interface Defect Hydrogen Depassivation and Capacitance–Voltage Hysteresis of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/InGaAs Gate Stacks
We
investigate the effects of pre- and postatomic layer deposition
(ALD) defect passivation with hydrogen on the trap density and reliability
of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/InGaAs gate stacks. Reliability is
characterized by capacitance–voltage hysteresis measurements
on samples prepared using different fabrication procedures and having
different initial trap densities. Despite its beneficial capability
to passivate both interface and border traps, a final forming gas
(H<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) anneal (FGA) step is correlated with
a significant hysteresis. This appears to be caused by hydrogen depassivation
of defects in the gate stack under bias stress, supported by the observed
bias stress-induced increase of interface trap density, and strong
hydrogen isotope effects on the measured hysteresis. On the other
hand, intentional air exposure of the InGaAs surface prior to Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ALD increases the initial interface trap density
(<i>D</i><sub>it</sub>) but considerably lowers the hysteresis
Passivation of InGaAs(001)-(2 × 4) by Self-Limiting Chemical Vapor Deposition of a Silicon Hydride Control Layer
A saturated
Si–H<sub><i>x</i></sub> seed layer
for gate oxide or contact conductor ALD has been deposited via two
separate self-limiting and saturating CVD processes on InGaAs(001)-(2
× 4) at substrate temperatures of 250 and 350 °C. For the
first self-limiting process, a single silicon precursor, Si<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>, was dosed at a substrate temperature of 250 °C,
and XPS results show the deposited silicon hydride layer saturated
at about 4 monolayers of silicon coverage with hydrogen termination.
STS results show the surface Fermi level remains unpinned following
the deposition of the saturated silicon hydride layer, indicating
the InGaAs surface dangling bonds are electrically passivated by Si–H<sub><i>x</i></sub>. For the second self-limiting process, Si<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>6</sub> was dosed at a substrate temperature of 350
°C, and XPS results show the deposited silicon chloride layer
saturated at about 2.5 monolayers of silicon coverage with chlorine
termination. Atomic hydrogen produced by a thermal gas cracker was
subsequently dosed at 350 °C to remove the Si–Cl termination
by replacing with Si–H termination as confirmed by XPS, and
STS results confirm the saturated Si–H<sub><i>x</i></sub> bilayer leaves the InGaAs(001)-(2 × 4) surface Fermi
level unpinned. Density function theory modeling of silicon hydride
surface passivation shows an Si–H<sub><i>x</i></sub> monolayer can remove all the dangling bonds and leave a charge balanced
surface on InGaAs