Atopic dermatitis:From monitoring to control

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disorder, affecting the lives of many individuals and their families. In addition to a complex heterogeneous pathogenesis and clinical presentation, management of AD can be challenging. In the AD care pathway, many professionals interact with the same patient on multiple occasions, often over the course of several years. Although pivotal, current management of AD is poorly investigated. Understanding the challenges in the treatment of AD and opportunities to improve care remains therefore difficult. Treatment of AD is based on three pillars: avoidance of irritants, strengthening of the skin barrier, and reducing inflammation. The ultimate goal of these strategies is to re-duce symptoms, improve quality of life, and achieve disease control. However, measuring these constructs in clinical practice and research can be challenging. Consequently, significant efforts have been made to establish a consensus-based core outcome set (COS) of well-validated measurement instruments for research and clinical practice. Nevertheless, several challenges remain present. For example, further validation of questionnaires set out to measure control in AD is needed as stakeholders including patients urged the need to include AD control as part of a COS. Next, as a potential intervention to achieve more control over AD, patients in the Netherlands have expressed a strong desire to investigate the role of antibacterial therapeutic clothing in AD. By reducing Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization, antibacterial therapeutic clothing aims to reduce AD symptoms and achieve more control. However, literature on the effectiveness of antibacterial therapeutic remains scarce and inconclusive. The aim of this thesis was to 1) enhance understanding and evaluate potential barriers in the current AD management, 2) contribute to the development, validation, and enhancement of measurement instruments, and 3) assess the role of antibacterial clothing in AD.<br/

Atopic dermatitis:From monitoring to control

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disorder, affecting the lives of many individuals and their families. In addition to a complex heterogeneous pathogenesis and clinical presentation, management of AD can be challenging. In the AD care pathway, many professionals interact with the same patient on multiple occasions, often over the course of several years. Although pivotal, current management of AD is poorly investigated. Understanding the challenges in the treatment of AD and opportunities to improve care remains therefore difficult. Treatment of AD is based on three pillars: avoidance of irritants, strengthening of the skin barrier, and reducing inflammation. The ultimate goal of these strategies is to re-duce symptoms, improve quality of life, and achieve disease control. However, measuring these constructs in clinical practice and research can be challenging. Consequently, significant efforts have been made to establish a consensus-based core outcome set (COS) of well-validated measurement instruments for research and clinical practice. Nevertheless, several challenges remain present. For example, further validation of questionnaires set out to measure control in AD is needed as stakeholders including patients urged the need to include AD control as part of a COS. Next, as a potential intervention to achieve more control over AD, patients in the Netherlands have expressed a strong desire to investigate the role of antibacterial therapeutic clothing in AD. By reducing Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization, antibacterial therapeutic clothing aims to reduce AD symptoms and achieve more control. However, literature on the effectiveness of antibacterial therapeutic remains scarce and inconclusive. The aim of this thesis was to 1) enhance understanding and evaluate potential barriers in the current AD management, 2) contribute to the development, validation, and enhancement of measurement instruments, and 3) assess the role of antibacterial clothing in AD.<br/

Shared symptomatology between atopic dermatitis, ADHD and autism spectrum disorder:a protocol for a systematic scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are more at risk for the neurodevelopmental disorders attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with parallel increases in global prevalences. Children afflicted with these conditions appear to share similar problems in sensory modulation but investigational studies on the underlying aetiology are scarce. This scoping review aims to find knowledge gaps, collate hypotheses and to summarise available evidence on the shared pathophysiology of AD, ADHD and ASD in children. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our study will follow the methodological manual published by the Joanna Briggs Methodology for Scoping Reviews and will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. The following electronic databases will be searched for studies focused on children with AD and symptoms of ADHD and/or ASD: Medline ALL via Ovid, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Wiley. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethics approval as it will not be conducted with human participants. We will only use published data. Our dissemination strategy includes peer review publication and conference reports.</p

Validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Limited research has been conducted on the measurement properties of the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) questionnaire, particularly in relation to interpretability. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the Dutch RECAP in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in a Dutch tertiary hospital, recruiting adults with AD between June 2021 and December 2022. Patients completed the RECAP questionnaire, reference instruments and anchor questions at the following three timepoints: baseline, after 1-3 days and after 4-12 weeks. Hypotheses testing was used to investigate single-score validity and change-score validity (responsiveness). To assess reliability, both standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCagreement) were reported. To assess the interpretability of single scores, bands for eczema control were proposed. To investigate the interpretability of change scores, both smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimally important change (MIC) scores were determined. To estimate the MIC scores, four different anchor-based methods were employed: the mean change method, 95% limit cut-off point, receiver operating characteristic curve and predictive modelling. RESULTS: In total, 200 participants were included (57.5% male sex, mean age 38.5 years). Of the a priori hypotheses, 82% (single-score validity) and 59% (responsiveness) were confirmed. Known-group analyses showed differences in the RECAP scores between patient groups based on disease severity and impairment of the quality of life. The SEMagreement was 1.17 points and the ICCagreement was 0.988. The final banding was as follows: 0-1 (completely controlled); 2-5 (mostly controlled); 6-11 (moderately controlled); 12-19 (a little controlled); 20-28 (not at all controlled). Moreover, a single cut-off point of ≥ 6 was determined to identify patients whose AD is not under control. The SDC was 3.2 points, and the MIC value from the predictive modelling was 3.9 points. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The RECAP has good single-score validity, moderate responsiveness and excellent reliability. This study fills a gap in the interpretability of the RECAP. Our results indicate a threshold of ≥ 6 points to identify patients whose AD is 'not under control', while an improvement of ≥ 4 points represents a clinically important change. Given its endorsement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiatives, the results of this study support the integration of RECAP into both routine clinical practice and research settings.</p

Remote severity assessment in atopic dermatitis:Validity and reliability of the remote Eczema Area and Severity Index and Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index

Background: Reliable assessment of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is necessary for clinical practice and research. Valid and reliable remote assessment is essential to facilitate remote care and research. Objectives: Assess the validity and reliability of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) based on images and patient-assessed severity based on the Self-Administered EASI (SA-EASI). Methods: Whole-body clinical images were taken during consultation from children with AD. After consultations, caregivers completed the SA-EASI and provided images from home. Four raters assessed all images twice using EASI. Results: A total of 1534 clinical images and 425 patient-provided images were collected from 87 and 32 children. Excellent (0.90) validity, good inter (0.77) and intrarater reliability (0.91), and standard error of measurement (4.31) was found for the EASI based on clinical images. Feasibility of patient-provided images showed limitations with missing images (43.8%) and quality issues (23.1%). However, good validity (0.86), inter (0.74) and intrarater reliability (0.94) were found when assessment was possible. Moderate correlation (0.60) between SA-EASI and EASI was found. Limitations: Low portion patient-provided images. Conclusion: AD severity assessment based on images strongly correlates with in-person AD assessment. Good measurement properties confirm the potential of remote assessment. Moderate correlation between SA-EASI and in-person EASI suggest limited value of self-assessment.</p

The construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) in children

Background The Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) was developed to measure eczema control in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). The measurement properties of RECAP have not yet been validated in caregivers of children with AD. Objectives To assess the construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Dutch proxy version of RECAP. Methods A prospective validation study was conducted in children (aged&lt;12 years) with AD and their caregivers (in a Dutch tertiary hospital). At three timepoints (T0=baseline; T1=after 1–7 days; T2=after 4–8 weeks) RECAP and multiple reference instruments were completed by caregivers of child patients. Single- and change-score validity (responsiveness) were tested with a priori hypotheses on correlations with reference instruments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCagreement) and standard error of agreement (SEMagreement) were reported. Bands for perceived eczema control were proposed. The smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimally important change (MIC) were determined. Two anchor-based methods based on receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and predictive modelling were used to determine the MIC. Results A total of 231 children with AD and their caregivers participated. Of our a priori hypotheses for single-score and change-score validity, 77% and 80% were confirmed, respectively. A stronger correlation than hypothesized was found for all rejected hypotheses. Excellent reliability was found (ICCagreement=0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.90–0.96). The SEMagreement was 1.9 points. The final banding was 0–1 (completely controlled), 2–7 (mostly controlled), 8–12 (moderately controlled), 13–18 (a little controlled) and 19–28 (not at all controlled). A cutoff point of≥8 was selected to identify children whose AD is not under control. The SDC was 5.3 and the MIC values were 1.5 and 3.6 for the ROC and predictive modelling approaches, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Conclusions The proxy version of RECAP is a valid, reliable and responsive measurement instrument for measuring eczema control in children with AD. An improvement of≥6 points can be regarded as a real and important change in children with AD.</p

The construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) in children

Background The Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) was developed to measure eczema control in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). The measurement properties of RECAP have not yet been validated in caregivers of children with AD. Objectives To assess the construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Dutch proxy version of RECAP. Methods A prospective validation study was conducted in children (aged&lt;12 years) with AD and their caregivers (in a Dutch tertiary hospital). At three timepoints (T0=baseline; T1=after 1–7 days; T2=after 4–8 weeks) RECAP and multiple reference instruments were completed by caregivers of child patients. Single- and change-score validity (responsiveness) were tested with a priori hypotheses on correlations with reference instruments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCagreement) and standard error of agreement (SEMagreement) were reported. Bands for perceived eczema control were proposed. The smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimally important change (MIC) were determined. Two anchor-based methods based on receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and predictive modelling were used to determine the MIC. Results A total of 231 children with AD and their caregivers participated. Of our a priori hypotheses for single-score and change-score validity, 77% and 80% were confirmed, respectively. A stronger correlation than hypothesized was found for all rejected hypotheses. Excellent reliability was found (ICCagreement=0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.90–0.96). The SEMagreement was 1.9 points. The final banding was 0–1 (completely controlled), 2–7 (mostly controlled), 8–12 (moderately controlled), 13–18 (a little controlled) and 19–28 (not at all controlled). A cutoff point of≥8 was selected to identify children whose AD is not under control. The SDC was 5.3 and the MIC values were 1.5 and 3.6 for the ROC and predictive modelling approaches, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Conclusions The proxy version of RECAP is a valid, reliable and responsive measurement instrument for measuring eczema control in children with AD. An improvement of≥6 points can be regarded as a real and important change in children with AD.</p

Care for children with atopic dermatitis in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic:Lessons from the first wave and implications for the future

The first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had an enormous impact on health-care services, including on care provision for children with atopic dermatitis (AD). We investigated the impact of COVID-19 on the care for children with moderate to severe AD at our tertiary outpatient clinic and examined satisfaction with care. We reviewed outpatient records, comparing total number and types of consultations during the first COVID-19 wave (March until July 2020) with the corresponding months of 2019 and 2018. In addition, we conducted a questionnaire-based study investigating the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and psychological symptoms, and satisfaction with care. A total number of 913 consultations (466 individual children) were conducted during the first COVID-19 wave in 2020, while 698 (391 individual children) and 591 consultations (356 individual children) were conducted in 2019 and 2018. The proportion of remote consultations was higher (56.2%) compared to 14.0% in 2019 and 12.7% in 2018. Worsening of AD was reported by 9.7% of caretakers. Overall satisfaction with provided care was high (8.6; interquartile range [IQR] = 7.3–10.0). Caretakers receiving face-to-face consultation were significantly (p = 0.026) more satisfied (9.0; IQR = 8.0–10.0) than caretakers receiving remote consultation (7.9; IQR = 7.0–9.5). The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on care provision for children with AD, particularly on the number of remote consultations. Overall satisfaction with care was high. The impact of COVID-19 on disease severity remained limited. Remote consultations seem to be a useful tool that can be put into practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

Prognostic Factors for Long-term Aesthetic Outcome of Infantile Haemangioma Treated with Beta-blockers

Parents of infants treated with beta-blockers for infantile haemangioma are often concerned about the long-term aesthetic outcome. This cross-sectional study assessed the influence on the long-term aesthetic outcome of characteristics of the infantile haemangioma, the beta-blocker treatment, and the infant. The study included 103 children aged 6-12 years, treated with beta-blockers (propranolol or atenolol) for infantile haemangioma during infancy (age at treatment initiation ≤1 year) for ≥6 months. Dermatologists and parents scored the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and the child scored a visual analogue scale. Dermatologists identified whether telangiectasia, fibrofatty tissue, and atrophic scar tissue were present. The long-term aesthetic outcome of infantile haemangioma was judged more negatively by dermatologists and parents in case of a superficial component, ulceration, older age at treatment initiation, higher cumulative dose, and/or shorter follow-up time. According to children, infantile haemangioma located on the head had better aesthetic outcome than infantile haemangioma located elsewhere. Close monitoring, particularly of infantile haemangioma with a superficial component, is essential for early initiation of treatment, and to prevent or treat ulceration. These outcome data can support parental counselling and guide treatment strategy.</p