The Relationship Between Obesity and Amputation-free Survival in Patients Undergoing Lower-limb Revascularisation for Chronic Limb-threatening Ischaemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThe obesity paradox is a well-documented phenomenon in cardiovascular disease, however it remains poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the relationship between body mass (as measured by body mass index [BMI]) and 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS) for patients undergoing lower limb revascularisation for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI).MethodsA retrospective analysis was undertaken of all consecutive patients undergoing lower limb revascularisation for CLTI at the Leicester Vascular Institute between February 2018–19. Baseline demographics and outcomes were collected using electronic records. BMI was stratified using the World Health Organization criteria. One-year AFS (composite of major amputation/death) was the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and adjusted Cox's proportional hazard models were used to compare groups to patients of normal mass.ResultsOne-hundred and ninety patients were included. Overall, no difference was identified in 1-year AFS across all groups (pooled P = 0.335). Compared to patients with normal BMI (n = 66), obese patients (n = 43) had a significantly lower adjusted combined risk of amputation/death (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16–0.92, P = 0.032), however no significant differences were observed for overweight (aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.47–1.70, P = 0.741), morbidly obese (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.41–3.20, P = 0.797) and underweight individuals (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 0.56–6.20, P = 0.314).ConclusionsIn the context of CLTI, obesity is potentially associated with favourable amputation-free survival at 1 year, compared to normal body mass. The results of this study support the notion of an obesity paradox existing within CLTI and question whether current guidance on weight management requires a more patient-specific approach.</div

Paclitaxel and Mortality Following Peripheral Angioplasty: An Adjusted and Case Matched Multicentre Analysis

Objective: Paclitaxel based drug coated balloons (DCBs) and drug eluting stents (DESs) may be associated with increased mortality in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), based on a recent meta-analysis. This study, however, had a number of limitations, which have been discussed at great length among the vascular community. The aim of this research was to assess the association between paclitaxel based endovascular treatment (PTX) in the femoropopliteal (F–P) segment and mortality, adjusting for relevant risk factors and including patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained multicentre (three sites) database of patients with claudication or CLTI. Patients having F–P angioplasty between 1 January 2014 and 30 May 2019 with or without PTX were included. Survival was compared in Cox regression analyses adjusted for parameters of the Charlson comorbidity index. A separate nested case matched (based on each individual's Charlson index) analysis was performed to compare mortality rates between those who received PTX and those who did not. Results: A total of 2 071 patients were analysed: 966 patients (46.6%) were treated with PTX (952 [46%] had CLTI and 1 119 [54%] severe claudication [Rutherford stage 3]). Over a 24 month median follow up, 456 (22.1%) patients died. Using multivariable Cox regression, PTX was not associated with mortality (HR 0.94, p = .46), even when assessed separately for those with intermittent claudication (HR 1.30, p = .15) or CLTI (HR 0.81, p = .060). In the case matched analysis (885 matched pairs of patients), PTX was not associated with mortality (HR 0.89, p = .17). Paclitaxel dose and use of a DCB or DES were not associated with mortality in any subanalysis. Conclusion: When relevant risk factors were taken into account, there were no associations between PTX and mid term mortality in patients with PAOD

Leg Ischaemia Management collaboration (LIMb): study protocol for a prospective cohort study at a single UK centre

Introduction Severe limb ischaemia (SLI) is the end-stage of peripheral arterial occlusive disease where the viability of the limb is threatened. Around 25% of patients with SLI will ultimately require a major lower limb amputation which has a substantial adverse impact on quality of life. A newly established rapid-access vascular limb salvage clinic and modern revascularisation techniques may reduce amputation rate. The aim of this study is to investigate the 12-month amputation rate in a contemporary cohort of patients and compare this to a historical cohort. Secondary aims are to investigate the use of frailty and cognitive assessments, and cardiac MRI in risk-stratifying patients with SLI undergoing intervention and establish a biobank for future biomarker analyses. Methods & analysis This single-centre prospective cohort study will recruit patients aged 18-110 years presenting with SLI. Those undergoing intervention will be eligible to undergo additional venepuncture (for biomarker analysis) and/or cardiac MRI. Those aged ≥65 years and undergoing intervention will also be eligible to undergo additional frailty and cognitive assessments. Follow-up will be at 12 and 24 months and subsequently via data-linkage with NHS digital to 10 years post-recruitment. Those undergoing cardiac MRI and/or frailty assessments will receive additional follow-up during the first 12 months to investigate for peri-operative myocardial infarction and frailty related outcomes, respectively. A sample size of 420 patients will be required to detect a 10% reduction in amputation rate in comparison to a similar sized historical cohort, with 90% power and 5% type-I error rate. Statistical analysis of this comparison will be by adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression analyses. Ethics & dissemination Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the UK National Research Ethics Service (19/LO/0132). Results will be disseminated to participants, via scientific meetings, peerreviewed medical journals and social media. Study registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT04027244