A influência do índice de massa corpórea elevado no processo de indução do parto / The influence of high body mass index in the child induction process

Objetivo: Analisar a influência do IMC no processo de indução do trabalho de parto por misoprostol e os seus desfechos. Metodologia: Pesquisa de caráter descritivo documental, realizada através da avaliação de prontuários de 90 gestantes internadas no Hospital Universitário Lauro Wanderley (HULW) e induzidas ao trabalho de parto com misoprostol com idade maior de 18 anos, os dados coletados foram posteriormente analisados no programa estatístico SPSS. As variáveis avaliadas foram: dados sóciodemográficos e clínicos materno e características e desfechos do processo de indução. Resultados: Das 90 mulheres analisadas, de acordo com o IMC, 54,5% estavam acima do peso, 12,2% baixo peso e 33,3% peso adequado, apresentando uma média de idade de 27,8 anos. Apresentaram IMC mais elevado mulheres na faixa etária de 33-45 anos e as multíparas. Quanto ao processo de indução, 46,7% das que tinham peso adequado tomaram apenas uma dose e as que estavam acima do peso tiveram maior tempo entre o início da indução até o parto. A maior parte das pacientes que evolui para parto normal apresentava baixo peso. Conclusão: O IMC influencia no processo de indução de trabalho de parto, interferindo no quantitativo de doses administradas, tempo total do início da indução ao parto, como também no tipo de parto realizado.

Efeitos da etcc sobre o aprendizado motor em pessoas com doença de Parkinson / Effects of cts on motor learning in people with parkinson's disease

ASCHERIO, Alberto; SCHWARZSCHILD, Michael A. The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease: risk factors and prevention. The Lancet Neurology, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1257-1272, 2016. BENNINGER, David H.; HALLETT, Mark. Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: current concepts and outlook 2015. NeuroRehabilitation, v. 37, n. 1, p. 11-24,2015. BRUNONI, Andre Russowsky et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1133-1145, 2011. CACABELOS, Ramón. Parkinson’s disease: from pathogenesis to pharmacogenomics.International journal of molecular sciences, v. 18, n. 3, p. 551, 2017. CHEN, Kai‐Hsiang Stanley; CHEN, Robert. Invasive and non‐invasive brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: Clinical effects and future perspectives. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2019. CHRISTOVA, Monica; RAFOLT, Dietmar; GALLASCH, Eugen. Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability. Behavioural brain research, v. 287, p. 27-33, 2015. FOX, Susan H. et al. International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence‐based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease.Movement Disorders, v. 33, n. 8, p. 1248-1266, 2018. FREGNI, Felipe et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders, v. 21, n. 10, p. 1693-1702, 2006. GRÜNER, Ulrike et al. 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by tDCS over the primary motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease: effects on bradykinesia of arm and hand. Journal of neural transmission, v. 117, n. 2, p. 207-216, 2010. HAYES, Michael W. et al. Updates and advances in the treatment of Parkinson disease. The Medical journal of Australia, 2019. HUANG, Sheau-Ling et al. Minimal detectable change of the timed “up & go” test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy, v. 91, n. 1, p. 114- 121, 2011. JONES, Sarah E. et al. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD. Thorax, p. 203- 576, 2013. LANG, Nicolas et al. Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after- effects. Biological psychiatry, v. 56, n. 9, p. 634-639, 2004.LEE, Hyo Keun et al. Does transcranial direct current stimulation improve functional locomotion in people with Parkinson’s disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neuroengineering and rehabilitation, v.16, n.1, p.84-96, 2019. LEFAUCHEUR, Jean-Pascal et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 128, n. 1, p. 56- 92, 2017. PAPEN, Mitra Von et al. The effects of 1 Hz rTMS preconditioned by tDCS on gait kinematics in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission, v. 121, n. 7, p. 743-754, 2014. SCHNEIDER, Ruth B.; IOURINETS, Julia; RICHARD, Irene H. Parkinson's disease psychosis: presentation, diagnosis and management. Neurodegenerative disease management, v. 7, n. 6, p. 365-376, 2017. OPARA, Józef et al. Motor assessment in Parkinsons disease. Ann Agric Environ Med, v. 24, n. 3, p. 411-415, 2017. PETERS, Denise M.; FRITZ, Stacy L.; KROTISH, Debra E. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. Journal of geriatric physical therapy, v. 36, n. 1, p. 24-30, 2013. REICH, S.G., SAVITT, J.M. Parkinson's Disease. MedIcal Clinics of North America. v. 103 n. 2, p. 337-350, 2018. RIBEIRO, Adriana Costa et al. Dopamine-independent effects of combining transcranial direct current stimulation with cued gait training on cortical excitability and functional mobility in Parkinson's disease. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, v. 48, n. 9, p. 819-823, 2016. RIBEIRO, Adriana Costa et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with gait training in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Developmental neurorehabilitation, v. 20, n. 3, p. 121-128, 2017. TYSNES, Ole-Bjørn; STORSTEIN, Anette. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission, v. 124, n. 8, p. 901-905, 2017. VALENTINO, Francesca et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of freezing of gait: A cross‐over study. Movement Disorders, v. 29, n. 8, p. 1064-1069, 2014